Structural comparison of three viral “fusion” proteins

1991 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 312S-312S
Author(s):  
BRUCE H NICHOLSON ◽  
MAHMOUD NAASE
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Structural Comparison ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins

scholarly journals New Biophysical Approaches Reveal the Dynamics and Mechanics of Type I Viral Fusion Machinery and Their Interplay with Membranes

Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Benhaim ◽  
Kelly K. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Viral Entry ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Fusion Reaction ◽  
Type I ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins

Protein-mediated membrane fusion is a highly regulated biological process essential for cellular and organismal functions and infection by enveloped viruses. During viral entry the membrane fusion reaction is catalyzed by specialized protein machinery on the viral surface. These viral fusion proteins undergo a series of dramatic structural changes during membrane fusion where they engage, remodel, and ultimately fuse with the host membrane. The structural and dynamic nature of these conformational changes and their impact on the membranes have long-eluded characterization. Recent advances in structural and biophysical methodologies have enabled researchers to directly observe viral fusion proteins as they carry out their functions during membrane fusion. Here we review the structure and function of type I viral fusion proteins and mechanisms of protein-mediated membrane fusion. We highlight how recent technological advances and new biophysical approaches are providing unprecedented new insight into the membrane fusion reaction.

Peptide models for the membrane destabilizing actions of viral fusion proteins

Biopolymers ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard M. Epand ◽  
James J. Cheetham ◽  
Raquel F. Epand ◽  
Philip L. Yeagle ◽  
Christopher D. Richardson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Peptide Models ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins

scholarly journals Characterization of EBV gB indicates properties of both class I and class II viral fusion proteins

Virology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 368 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marija Backovic ◽  
George P. Leser ◽  
Robert A. Lamb ◽  
Richard Longnecker ◽  
Theodore S. Jardetzky
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins

scholarly journals Thiol/Disulfide Exchange Is Required for Membrane Fusion Directed by the Newcastle Disease Virus Fusion Protein

2006 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 2328-2339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surbhi Jain ◽  
Lori W. McGinnes ◽  
Trudy G. Morrison
Keyword(s):  
Cell Surface ◽  
Newcastle Disease Virus ◽  
Newcastle Disease ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Protein Disulfide Isomerase ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Disulfide Isomerase ◽  
F Protein ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins ◽  
Protein Disulfide

ABSTRACT Newcastle disease virus (NDV), an avian paramyxovirus, initiates infection with attachment of the viral hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) protein to sialic acid-containing receptors, followed by fusion of viral and cell membranes, which is mediated by the fusion (F) protein. Like all class 1 viral fusion proteins, the paramyxovirus F protein is thought to undergo dramatic conformational changes upon activation. How the F protein accomplishes extensive conformational rearrangements is unclear. Since several viral fusion proteins undergo disulfide bond rearrangement during entry, we asked if similar rearrangements occur in NDV proteins during entry. We found that inhibitors of cell surface thiol/disulfide isomerase activity—5′5-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB), bacitracin, and anti-protein disulfide isomerase antibody—inhibited cell-cell fusion and virus entry but had no effect on cell viability, glycoprotein surface expression, or HN protein attachment or neuraminidase activities. These inhibitors altered the conformation of surface-expressed F protein, as detected by conformation-sensitive antibodies. Using biotin maleimide (MPB), a reagent that binds to free thiols, free thiols were detected on surface-expressed F protein, but not HN protein. The inhibitors DTNB and bacitracin blocked the detection of these free thiols. Furthermore, MPB binding inhibited cell-cell fusion. Taken together, our results suggest that one or several disulfide bonds in cell surface F protein are reduced by the protein disulfide isomerase family of isomerases and that F protein exists as a mixture of oxidized and reduced forms. In the presence of HN protein, only the reduced form may proceed to refold into additional intermediates, leading to the fusion of membranes.

scholarly journals Viral Membrane Fusion and the Transmembrane Domain

Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chelsea T. Barrett ◽  
Rebecca Ellis Dutch
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Host Cell ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Transmembrane Region ◽  
Host Cell Membrane ◽  
The Past ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins

Initiation of host cell infection by an enveloped virus requires a viral-to-host cell membrane fusion event. This event is mediated by at least one viral transmembrane glycoprotein, termed the fusion protein, which is a key therapeutic target. Viral fusion proteins have been studied for decades, and numerous critical insights into their function have been elucidated. However, the transmembrane region remains one of the most poorly understood facets of these proteins. In the past ten years, the field has made significant advances in understanding the role of the membrane-spanning region of viral fusion proteins. We summarize developments made in the past decade that have contributed to the understanding of the transmembrane region of viral fusion proteins, highlighting not only their critical role in the membrane fusion process, but further demonstrating their involvement in several aspects of the viral lifecycle.

scholarly journals Reevaluating Herpes Simplex Virus Hemifusion

2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (22) ◽  
pp. 11814-11821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia O. Jackson ◽  
Richard Longnecker
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Fusion Pore ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Viral Fusion Protein ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins ◽  
Simplex Virus

ABSTRACT Membrane fusion induced by enveloped viruses proceeds through the actions of viral fusion proteins. Once activated, viral fusion proteins undergo large protein conformational changes to execute membrane fusion. Fusion is thought to proceed through a “hemifusion” intermediate in which the outer membrane leaflets of target and viral membranes mix (lipid mixing) prior to fusion pore formation, enlargement, and completion of fusion. Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) requires four glycoproteins—glycoprotein D (gD), glycoprotein B (gB), and a heterodimer of glycoprotein H and L (gH/gL)—to accomplish fusion. gD is primarily thought of as a receptor-binding protein and gB as a fusion protein. The role of gH/gL in fusion has remained enigmatic. Despite experimental evidence that gH/gL may be a fusion protein capable of inducing hemifusion in the absence of gB, the recently solved crystal structure of HSV-2 gH/gL has no structural homology to any known viral fusion protein. We found that in our hands, all HSV entry proteins—gD, gB, and gH/gL—were required to observe lipid mixing in both cell-cell- and virus-cell-based hemifusion assays. To verify that our hemifusion assay was capable of detecting hemifusion, we used glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked hemagglutinin (HA), a variant of the influenza virus fusion protein, HA, known to stall the fusion process before productive fusion pores are formed. Additionally, we found that a mutant carrying an insertion within the short gH cytoplasmic tail, 824L gH, is incapable of executing hemifusion despite normal cell surface expression. Collectively, our findings suggest that HSV gH/gL may not function as a fusion protein and that all HSV entry glycoproteins are required for both hemifusion and fusion. The previously described gH 824L mutation blocks gH/gL function prior to HSV-induced lipid mixing.

scholarly journals Protonation of Individual Histidine Residues Is Not Required for the pH-Dependent Entry of West Nile Virus: Evaluation of the “Histidine Switch” Hypothesis

2009 ◽  
Vol 83 (23) ◽  
pp. 12631-12635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steevenson Nelson ◽  
Subhajit Poddar ◽  
Tsai-Yu Lin ◽  
Theodore C. Pierson
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
West Nile Virus ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Ph Sensing ◽  
West Nile ◽  
Histidine Residues ◽  
E Protein ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins ◽  
Ph Dependent

ABSTRACT Histidine residues have been hypothesized to function as sensors of environmental pH that can trigger the activity of viral fusion proteins. We investigated a requirement for histidine residues in the envelope (E) protein of West Nile virus during pH-dependent entry into cells. Each histidine was individually replaced with a nonionizable amino acid and tested functionally. In each instance, mutants capable of orchestrating pH-dependent infection were identified. These results do not support a requirement for any single histidine as a pH-sensing “switch,” and they suggest that additional features of the E protein are involved in triggering pH-dependent steps in the flavivirus life cycle.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document