scholarly journals Viral Membrane Fusion and the Transmembrane Domain

Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chelsea T. Barrett ◽  
Rebecca Ellis Dutch
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Host Cell ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Transmembrane Region ◽  
Host Cell Membrane ◽  
The Past ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins

Initiation of host cell infection by an enveloped virus requires a viral-to-host cell membrane fusion event. This event is mediated by at least one viral transmembrane glycoprotein, termed the fusion protein, which is a key therapeutic target. Viral fusion proteins have been studied for decades, and numerous critical insights into their function have been elucidated. However, the transmembrane region remains one of the most poorly understood facets of these proteins. In the past ten years, the field has made significant advances in understanding the role of the membrane-spanning region of viral fusion proteins. We summarize developments made in the past decade that have contributed to the understanding of the transmembrane region of viral fusion proteins, highlighting not only their critical role in the membrane fusion process, but further demonstrating their involvement in several aspects of the viral lifecycle.

scholarly journals New Biophysical Approaches Reveal the Dynamics and Mechanics of Type I Viral Fusion Machinery and Their Interplay with Membranes

Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Benhaim ◽  
Kelly K. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Viral Entry ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Fusion Reaction ◽  
Type I ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins

Protein-mediated membrane fusion is a highly regulated biological process essential for cellular and organismal functions and infection by enveloped viruses. During viral entry the membrane fusion reaction is catalyzed by specialized protein machinery on the viral surface. These viral fusion proteins undergo a series of dramatic structural changes during membrane fusion where they engage, remodel, and ultimately fuse with the host membrane. The structural and dynamic nature of these conformational changes and their impact on the membranes have long-eluded characterization. Recent advances in structural and biophysical methodologies have enabled researchers to directly observe viral fusion proteins as they carry out their functions during membrane fusion. Here we review the structure and function of type I viral fusion proteins and mechanisms of protein-mediated membrane fusion. We highlight how recent technological advances and new biophysical approaches are providing unprecedented new insight into the membrane fusion reaction.

scholarly journals Reevaluating Herpes Simplex Virus Hemifusion

2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (22) ◽  
pp. 11814-11821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia O. Jackson ◽  
Richard Longnecker
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Fusion Pore ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Viral Fusion Protein ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins ◽  
Simplex Virus

ABSTRACT Membrane fusion induced by enveloped viruses proceeds through the actions of viral fusion proteins. Once activated, viral fusion proteins undergo large protein conformational changes to execute membrane fusion. Fusion is thought to proceed through a “hemifusion” intermediate in which the outer membrane leaflets of target and viral membranes mix (lipid mixing) prior to fusion pore formation, enlargement, and completion of fusion. Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) requires four glycoproteins—glycoprotein D (gD), glycoprotein B (gB), and a heterodimer of glycoprotein H and L (gH/gL)—to accomplish fusion. gD is primarily thought of as a receptor-binding protein and gB as a fusion protein. The role of gH/gL in fusion has remained enigmatic. Despite experimental evidence that gH/gL may be a fusion protein capable of inducing hemifusion in the absence of gB, the recently solved crystal structure of HSV-2 gH/gL has no structural homology to any known viral fusion protein. We found that in our hands, all HSV entry proteins—gD, gB, and gH/gL—were required to observe lipid mixing in both cell-cell- and virus-cell-based hemifusion assays. To verify that our hemifusion assay was capable of detecting hemifusion, we used glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked hemagglutinin (HA), a variant of the influenza virus fusion protein, HA, known to stall the fusion process before productive fusion pores are formed. Additionally, we found that a mutant carrying an insertion within the short gH cytoplasmic tail, 824L gH, is incapable of executing hemifusion despite normal cell surface expression. Collectively, our findings suggest that HSV gH/gL may not function as a fusion protein and that all HSV entry glycoproteins are required for both hemifusion and fusion. The previously described gH 824L mutation blocks gH/gL function prior to HSV-induced lipid mixing.

Virus Membrane Fusion Proteins: Biological Machines that Undergo a Metamorphosis

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 597-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Ellis Dutch ◽  
Theodore S. Jardetzky ◽  
Robert A. Lamb
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Ebola Virus ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Fusion Peptide ◽  
Proteolytic Cleavage ◽  
Heptad Repeat ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Hydrophobic Region ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins

Fusion proteins from a group of widely disparate viruses, including the paramyxovirus F protein, the HIV and SIV gp160 proteins, the retroviral Env protein, the Ebola virus Gp, and the influenza virus haemagglutinin, share a number of common features. All contain multiple glycosylation sites, and must be trimeric and undergo proteolytic cleavage to be fusogenically active. Subsequent to proteolytic cleavage, the subunit containing the transmembrane domain in each case has an extremely hydrophobic region, termed the fusion peptide, or at near its newly generated N-terminus. In addition, all of these viral fusion proteins have 4–3 heptad repeat sequences near both the fusion peptide and the transmembrane domain. These regions have been demonstrated from a tight complex, in which the N-terminal heptad repeat forms a trimeric-coiled coil, with the C-terminal heptad repeat forming helical regions that buttress the coiled-coil in an anti-parallel manner. The significance of each of these structuralelements in the processing and function of these viral fusion proteins is discussed.

scholarly journals Localization and Regulation of the T1 Unimolecular Spanin

2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (22) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohit Kongari ◽  
Jeffrey Snowden ◽  
Joel D. Berry ◽  
Ry Young
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Outer Membrane ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Outer Membranes ◽  
Two Component ◽  
Membrane Fusion Proteins

ABSTRACTSpanins are bacteriophage lysis proteins responsible for disruption of the outer membrane, the final step of Gram-negative host lysis. The absence of spanins results in a terminal phenotype of fragile spherical cells. The phage T1 employs a unimolecular spanin gp11that has an N-terminal lipoylation signal and a C-terminal transmembrane domain. Upon maturation and localization, gp11ends up as an outer membrane lipoprotein with a C-terminal transmembrane domain embedded in the inner membrane, thus connecting both membranes as a covalent polypeptide chain. Unlike the two-component spanins encoded by most of the other phages, including lambda, the unimolecular spanins have not been studied extensively. In this work, we show that the gp11mutants lacking either membrane localization signal were nonfunctional and conferred a partially dominant phenotype. Translation from internal start sites within the gp11coding sequence generated a shorter product which exhibited a negative regulatory effect on gp11function. Fluorescence spectroscopy time-lapse videos of gp11-GFP expression showed gp11accumulated in distinct punctate foci, suggesting localized clusters assembled within the peptidoglycan meshwork. In addition, gp11was shown to mediate lysis in the absence of holin and endolysin function when peptidoglycan density was depleted by starvation for murein precursors. This result indicates that the peptidoglycan is a negative regulator of gp11function. This supports a model in which gp11acts by fusing the inner and outer membranes, a mode of action analogous to but mechanistically distinct from that proposed for the two-component spanin systems.IMPORTANCESpanins have been proposed to fuse the cytoplasmic and outer membranes during phage lysis. Recent work with the lambda spanins Rz-Rz1, which are similar to class I viral fusion proteins, has shed light on the functional domains and requirements for two-component spanin function. Here we report, for the first time, a genetic and biochemical approach to characterize unimolecular spanins, which are structurally and mechanistically different from two-component spanins. Considering similar predicted secondary structures within the ectodomains, unimolecular spanins can be regarded as a prokaryotic version of type II viral membrane fusion proteins. This study not only adds to our understanding of regulation of phage lysis at various levels but also provides a prokaryotic genetically tractable platform for interrogating class II-like membrane fusion proteins.

scholarly journals An Antibody Directed against the Fusion Peptide of Junín Virus Envelope Glycoprotein GPC Inhibits pH-Induced Membrane Fusion

2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (12) ◽  
pp. 6119-6129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne York ◽  
Jody D. Berry ◽  
Ute Ströher ◽  
Qunnu Li ◽  
Heinz Feldmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Membrane ◽  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Host Cell ◽  
Envelope Glycoprotein ◽  
Fusion Peptide ◽  
Intermediate Form ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Virus Envelope ◽  
Host Cell Membrane ◽  
Helix Bundle

ABSTRACT The arenavirus envelope glycoprotein (GPC) initiates infection in the host cell through pH-induced fusion of the viral and endosomal membranes. As in other class I viral fusion proteins, this process proceeds through a structural reorganization in GPC in which the ectodomain of the transmembrane fusion subunit (G2) engages the host cell membrane and subsequently refolds to form a highly stable six-helix bundle structure that brings the two membranes into apposition for fusion. Here, we describe a G2-directed monoclonal antibody, F100G5, that prevents membrane fusion by binding to an intermediate form of the protein on the fusion pathway. Inhibition of syncytium formation requires that F100G5 be present concomitant with exposure of GPC to acidic pH. We show that F100G5 recognizes neither the six-helix bundle nor the larger trimer-of-hairpins structure in the postfusion form of G2. Rather, Western blot analysis using recombinant proteins and a panel of alanine-scanning GPC mutants revealed that F100G5 binding is dependent on an invariant lysine residue (K283) near the N terminus of G2, in the so-called fusion peptide that inserts into the host cell membrane during the fusion process. The F100G5 epitope is located in the internal segment of the bipartite GPC fusion peptide, which also contains four conserved cysteine residues, raising the possibility that this fusion peptide may be highly structured. Collectively, our studies indicate that F100G5 identifies an on-path intermediate form of GPC. Binding to the transiently exposed fusion peptide may interfere with G2 insertion into the host cell membrane. Strategies to effectively target fusion peptide function in the endosome may lead to novel classes of antiviral agents.

scholarly journals A Discrete Stage of Baculovirus GP64-mediated Membrane Fusion

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4191-4200 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Kingsley ◽  
Ali Behbahani ◽  
Afshin Rashtian ◽  
Gary W. Blissard ◽  
Joshua Zimmerberg
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Low Ph ◽  
Heptad Repeat ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Viral Fusion Protein ◽  
Heptad Repeats

Viral fusion protein trimers can play a critical role in limiting lipids in membrane fusion. Because the trimeric oligomer of many viral fusion proteins is often stabilized by hydrophobic 4-3 heptad repeats, higher-order oligomers might be stabilized by similar sequences. There is a hydrophobic 4-3 heptad repeat contiguous to a putative oligomerization domain of Autographa californica multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus envelope glycoprotein GP64. We performed mutagenesis and peptide inhibition studies to determine if this sequence might play a role in catalysis of membrane fusion. First, leucine-to-alanine mutants within and flanking the amino terminus of the hydrophobic 4-3 heptad repeat motif that oligomerize into trimers and traffic to insect Sf9 cell surfaces were identified. These mutants retained their wild-type conformation at neutral pH and changed conformation in acidic conditions, as judged by the reactivity of a conformationally sensitive mAb. These mutants, however, were defective for membrane fusion. Second, a peptide encoding the portion flanking the GP64 hydrophobic 4-3 heptad repeat was synthesized. Adding peptide led to inhibition of membrane fusion, which occurred only when the peptide was present during low pH application. The presence of peptide during low pH application did not prevent low pH–induced conformational changes, as determined by the loss of a conformationally sensitive epitope. In control experiments, a peptide of identical composition but different sequence, or a peptide encoding a portion of the Ebola GP heptad motif, had no effect on GP64-mediated fusion. Furthermore, when the hemagglutinin (X31 strain) fusion protein of influenza was functionally expressed in Sf9 cells, no effect on hemagglutinin-mediated fusion was observed, suggesting that the peptide does not exert nonspecific effects on other fusion proteins or cell membranes. Collectively, these studies suggest that the specific peptide sequences of GP64 that are adjacent to and include portions of the hydrophobic 4-3 heptad repeat play a dynamic role in membrane fusion at a stage that is downstream of the initiation of protein conformational changes but upstream of lipid mixing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document