scholarly journals Regulation of the acto·myosin subfragment 1 interaction by troponin/tropomyosin. Evidence for control of a specific isomerization between two acto·myosin subfragment 1 states

1991 ◽  
Vol 279 (3) ◽  
pp. 711-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
D F A McKillop ◽  
M A Geeves

The co-operative binding of myosin subfragment 1 (S1) to reconstituted skeletal-muscle thin filaments has been examined by monitoring the fluorescence of a pyrene probe on Cys-374 of actin. The degree of co-operativity differs when phosphate, sulphate or ADP are bound to the S1 active site. Binding isotherms have been analysed according to the Geeves & Halsall [(1987) Biophys. J. 52, 215-220] model, which proposed that troponin and tropomyosin effected regulation of the actomyosin interaction by controlling an isomerization of the actomyosin complex. The data support the proposal that seven actin monomers associated with a single tropomyosin molecule act as a co-operative unit that can be in one of two states. In the ‘closed’ state myosin can bind to actin, but the subsequent isomerization is prevented. The isomerization is only allowed after the seven-actin unit is in the ‘open’ form. Ca2+ controls the proportion of actin filaments in the ‘closed’ and ‘open’ forms in the absence of myosin heads. The ratio of ‘closed’ to ‘open’ forms is approx. 50:1 in the absence of Ca2+ and 5:1 in its presence.

We have used actin labelled in Cys–374 with N -(1-pyrenyl)iodoacetamide to monitor the dynamics and equilibria of the interaction between myosin subfragment 1 and the actin–troponin–tropomyosin complex in the presence of calcium. These results are compared with those obtained for pure actin and myosin subfragment 1. The sensitivity of this fluorescent label allowed us to measure the binding affinity of myosin subfragment 1 for actin directly by fluorescence titration. The affinity of subfragment 1 for actin is increased sixfold by troponin–tropomyosin in the presence of calcium. Kinetic studies of the interaction of subfragment 1 and actin have revealed an isomerization of the actin–subfragment 1 complex from a state in which actin is weakly bound ( K a = 5.9 x 10 4 M -1 ) to a more tightly bound complex ( K a = 1.7 x 10 7 M -1 ) (Coates, Criddle & Geeves (1985) Biochem. J. 232, 351). Results in the presence of troponin–tropomyosin show the same isomerization. The sixfold increase in affinity of subfragment 1 for actin is shown to be due to a decrease in the rate of dissociation of actin from the weakly bound complex.


Author(s):  
Donald A. Winkelmann

The primary role of the interaction of actin and myosin is the generation of force and motion as a direct consequence of the cyclic interaction of myosin crossbridges with actin filaments. Myosin is composed of six polypeptides: two heavy chains of molecular weight 220,000 daltons and two pairs of light chains of molecular weight 17,000-23,000. The C-terminal portions of the myosin heavy chains associate to form an α-helical coiled-coil rod which is responsible for myosin filament formation. The N-terminal portion of each heavy chain associates with two different light chains to form a globular head that binds actin and hydrolyses ATP. Myosin can be fragmented by limited proteolysis into several structural and functional domains. It has recently been demonstrated using an in vitro movement assay that the globular head domain, subfragment-1, is sufficient to cause sliding movement of actin filaments.The discovery of conditions for crystallization of the myosin subfragment-1 (S1) has led to a systematic analysis of S1 structure by x-ray crystallography and electron microscopy. Image analysis of electron micrographs of thin sections of small S1 crystals has been used to determine the structure of S1 in the crystal lattice.


Biochemistry ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 641-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Murray ◽  
Annemarie Weber ◽  
Mary K. Knox

Biochemistry ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 23 (17) ◽  
pp. 3994-4002 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Perkins ◽  
James A. Wells ◽  
Ralph G. Yount

1983 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus C. SCHAUB ◽  
John G. WATTERSON ◽  
Klaus LOTH ◽  
Daniela FOLETTA

Biochemistry ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 23 (18) ◽  
pp. 4150-4155 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Williams ◽  
Lois E. Greene ◽  
Evan Eisenberg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document