Mechanistic and structural insights into histone H2A–H2B chaperone in chromatin regulation

2020 ◽  
Vol 477 (17) ◽  
pp. 3367-3386
Author(s):  
Yan Huang ◽  
Yaxin Dai ◽  
Zheng Zhou

Histone chaperones include a wide variety of proteins which associate with histones and regulate chromatin structure. The classic H2A–H2B type of histone chaperones, and the chromatin remodeling complex components possessing H2A–H2B chaperone activity, show a broad range of structures and functions. Rapid progress in the structural and functional study of H2A–H2B chaperones extends our knowledge about the epigenetic regulation of chromatin. In this review, we summarize the most recent advances in the understanding of the structure and function of H2A–H2B chaperones that interact with either canonical or variant H2A–H2B dimers. We discuss the current knowledge of the H2A–H2B chaperones, which present no preference for canonical and variant H2A–H2B dimers, describing how they interact with H2A–H2B to fulfill their functions. We also review recent advances of H2A variant-specific chaperones, demarcating how they achieve specific recognition for histone variant H2A.Z and how these interactions regulate chromatin structure by nucleosome editing. We highlight the universal mechanism underlying H2A–H2B dimers recognition by a large variety of histone chaperones. These findings will shed insight into the biological impacts of histone chaperone, chromatin remodeling complex, and histone variants in chromatin regulation.

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Altaf ◽  
Andréanne Auger ◽  
Marcela Covic ◽  
Jacques Côté

The organization of the eukaryotic genome into chromatin makes it inaccessible to the factors required for gene transcription and DNA replication, recombination, and repair. In addition to histone-modifying enzymes and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes, which play key roles in regulating many nuclear processes by altering the chromatin structure, cells have developed a mechanism of modulating chromatin structure by incorporating histone variants. These variants are incorporated into specific regions of the genome throughout the cell cycle. H2A.Z, which is an evolutionarily conserved H2A variant, performs several seemingly unrelated and even contrary functions. Another H2A variant, H2A.X, plays a very important role in the cellular response to DNA damage. This review summarizes the recent developments in our understanding of the role of H2A.Z and H2A.X in the regulation of chromatin structure and function, focusing on their functional links with chromatin modifying and remodeling complexes.


2006 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 109-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Stockdale ◽  
Michael Bruno ◽  
Helder Ferreira ◽  
Elisa Garcia-Wilson ◽  
Nicola Wiechens ◽  
...  

In the 30 years since the discovery of the nucleosome, our picture of it has come into sharp focus. The recent high-resolution structures have provided a wealth of insight into the function of the nucleosome, but they are inherently static. Our current knowledge of how nucleosomes can be reconfigured dynamically is at a much earlier stage. Here, recent advances in the understanding of chromatin structure and dynamics are highlighted. The ways in which different modes of nucleosome reconfiguration are likely to influence each other are discussed, and some of the factors likely to regulate the dynamic properties of nucleosomes are considered.


2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 4218-4229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. V. L. Wong ◽  
Suzanna R. S. Scott-Drew ◽  
Matthew J. Hayes ◽  
Philip J. Howard ◽  
James A. H. Murray

ABSTRACT The stable maintenance of the 2μm circle plasmid depends on its ability to overcome intrinsic maternal inheritance bias, which in yeast normally results in the failure to transmit DNA molecules efficiently to daughter cells. In addition to the plasmid proteins Rep1 and Rep2 acting on the plasmid DNA locus STB, it is likely that other chromosomally encoded yeast proteins are required. We have isolated mutants of yeast unable to maintain 2μm and found that RSC2 is essential for 2μm to overcome maternal inheritance bias. Rsc2 is part of a multisubunit RSC chromatin remodeling complex, and we show that in the absence of Rsc2 the chromatin structure of the STB region is significantly altered and the Rep1 protein loses its normal localization to subnuclear foci. Rsc1, a closely related homolog of Rsc2 present in an alternative form of the RSC complex, is not required for 2μm maintenance and does not replace the requirement for Rsc2 when overexpressed. This represents the first specific role for Rsc2 that has been related to a change in chromatin structure, as well as the first direct evidence linking chromatin structure to 2μm segregation.


1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 2817-2827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth S. Haswell ◽  
Erin K. O’Shea

ABSTRACT The Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene PHO5 is an excellent system with which to study regulated changes in chromatin structure. The PHO5 promoter is packaged into four positioned nucleosomes under repressing conditions; upon induction, the structure of these nucleosomes is altered such that the promoter DNA becomes accessible to nucleases. We report here the development and characterization of an in vitro system in which partially purified PHO5 minichromosomes undergo promoter chromatin remodeling. Several hallmarks of thePHO5 chromatin transition in vivo were reproduced in this system. Chromatin remodeling of PHO5minichromosomes required the transcription factors Pho4 and Pho2, was localized to the promoter region of PHO5, and was independent of the chromatin-remodeling complex Swi-Snf. In vitro chromatin remodeling also required the addition of fractionated nuclear extract and hydrolyzable ATP. This in vitro system should serve as a useful tool for identifying the components required for this reaction and for elucidating the mechanism by which the PHO5promoter chromatin structure is changed.


Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuanzhao Jiang ◽  
Tatiana A. Soboleva ◽  
David J. Tremethick

The dynamic packaging of DNA into chromatin regulates all aspects of genome function by altering the accessibility of DNA and by providing docking pads to proteins that copy, repair and express the genome. Different epigenetic-based mechanisms have been described that alter the way DNA is organised into chromatin, but one fundamental mechanism alters the biochemical composition of a nucleosome by substituting one or more of the core histones with their variant forms. Of the core histones, the largest number of histone variants belong to the H2A class. The most divergent class is the designated “short H2A variants” (H2A.B, H2A.L, H2A.P and H2A.Q), so termed because they lack a H2A C-terminal tail. These histone variants appeared late in evolution in eutherian mammals and are lineage-specific, being expressed in the testis (and, in the case of H2A.B, also in the brain). To date, most information about the function of these peculiar histone variants has come from studies on the H2A.B and H2A.L family in mice. In this review, we describe their unique protein characteristics, their impact on chromatin structure, and their known functions plus other possible, even non-chromatin, roles in an attempt to understand why these peculiar histone variants evolved in the first place.


2007 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 426-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Armstrong

Initiation by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) involves a host of enzymes, and the process of elongation appears similarly complex. Transcriptional elongation through chromatin requires the coordinated efforts of Pol II and its associated transcription factors: C-terminal domain kinases, elongation complexes, chromatin-modifying enzymes, chromatin remodeling factors, histone chaperones (nucleosome assembly factors), and histone variants. This review examines the following: (i) the consequences of the encounter between elongating Pol II and a nucleosome, and (ii) chromatin remodeling factors and nucleosome assembly factors that have recently been identified as important for the elongation stage of transcription.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debashish U. Menon ◽  
Yoichiro Shibata ◽  
Weipeng Mu ◽  
Terry Magnuson

AbstractA deficiency in BRG1, the catalytic subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, results in a meiotic arrest during spermatogenesis. Here, we explore the causative mechanisms. BRG1 is preferentially enriched at active promoters of genes essential for spermatogonial pluripotency and meiosis. In contrast, BRG1 is also associated with the repression of somatic genes. Chromatin accessibility at these target promoters is dependent upon BRG1. These results favor a model where BRG1 coordinates spermatogenic transcription to ensure meiotic progression. In spermatocytes, BRG1 interacts with SCML2, a testes specific PRC1 factor that is associated with the repression of somatic genes. We present evidence to suggest that BRG1 and SCML2 concordantly regulate genes during meiosis. Furthermore, BRG1 is required for the proper localization of SCML2 and its associated deubiquitinase, USP7, to the sex chromosomes during pachynema. SCML2 associated, mono ubiquitination of histone H2A lysine 119 (H2AK119ub1) and acetylation of histone lysine 27 (H3K27ac) are elevated in Brg1cKO testes. Coincidentally, the PRC1 ubiquitin ligase, RNF2 is activated while a histone H2A/H2B deubiquitinase, USP3 is repressed. Thus, BRG1 impacts the male epigenome by influencing the localization and expression of epigenetic modifiers. This mechanism highlights a novel paradigm of co-operativity between SWI/SNF and PRC1.Summary statementBRG1, a catalytic subunit of SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, interacts with SCML2 (Sex comb on midleg-like 2), a polycomb repressive 1 (PRC1) factor, to regulate transcription during spermatogenesis. This represents a novel paradigm of SWI/SNF-PRC1 co-operation during gametogenesis.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe Pillidge ◽  
Sarah J Bray

AbstractNotch signaling plays a key role in many cell fate decisions during development by directing different gene expression programs via the transcription factor CSL, known as Su(H) in Drosophila. Which target genes are responsive to Notch signaling is influenced by the chromatin state of enhancers, yet how this is regulated is not fully known. Detecting an increase in the histone variant H3.3 in response to Notch signaling, we tested which chromatin remodelers or histone chaperones were required for the changes in enhancer accessibility to Su(H) binding. This revealed a crucial role for the Brahma SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex in conferring enhancer accessibility and enabling the transcriptional response. The Notch-responsive regions had high levels of nucleosome turnover which were dependent on the Brahma complex, increased with Notch signaling and primarily involved histone H3.3. Together these results highlight the importance of SWI/SNF-mediated nucleosome turnover in rendering enhancers responsive to Notch.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document