scholarly journals SNAREs, tethers and SM proteins: how to overcome the final barriers to membrane fusion?

2020 ◽  
Vol 477 (1) ◽  
pp. 243-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herre Jelger Risselada ◽  
Andreas Mayer
Keyword(s):  
Free Energy ◽  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Fusion Reaction ◽  
Natural Resistance ◽  
Fusion Pore ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Protein Fusion ◽  
Energy Barriers ◽  
Sm Proteins

Physiological membrane vesicles are built to separate reaction spaces in a stable manner, even when they accidentally collide or are kept in apposition by spatial constraints in the cell. This requires a natural resistance to fusion and mixing of their content, which originates from substantial energetic barriers to membrane fusion [1]. To facilitate intracellular membrane fusion reactions in a controlled manner, proteinaceous fusion machineries have evolved. An important open question is whether protein fusion machineries actively pull the fusion reaction over the present free energy barriers, or whether they rather catalyze fusion by lowering those barriers. At first sight, fusion proteins such as SNARE complexes and viral fusion proteins appear to act as nano-machines, which mechanically transduce force to the membranes and thereby overcome the free energy barriers [2,3]. Whether fusion proteins additionally alter the free energy landscape of the fusion reaction via catalytic roles is less obvious. This is a question that we shall discuss in this review, with particular focus on the influence of the eukaryotic SNARE-dependent fusion machinery on the final step of the reaction, the formation and expansion of the fusion pore.

scholarly journals How proteins open fusion pores: insights from molecular simulations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jelger Risselada ◽  
Helmut Grubmüller
Keyword(s):  
Free Energy ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Graphics Processing Units ◽  
Fusion Reaction ◽  
Molecular Simulations ◽  
Minimum Free Energy ◽  
Free Energy Calculations ◽  
Coarse Grained ◽  
Fusion Pore ◽  
Graphics Processing

AbstractFusion proteins can play a versatile and involved role during all stages of the fusion reaction. Their roles go far beyond forcing the opposing membranes into close proximity to drive stalk formation and fusion. Molecular simulations have played a central role in providing a molecular understanding of how fusion proteins actively overcome the free energy barriers of the fusion reaction up to the expansion of the fusion pore. Unexpectedly, molecular simulations have revealed a preference of the biological fusion reaction to proceed through asymmetric pathways resulting in the formation of, e.g., a stalk-hole complex, rim-pore, or vertex pore. Force-field based molecular simulations are now able to directly resolve the minimum free-energy path in protein-mediated fusion as well as quantifying the free energies of formed reaction intermediates. Ongoing developments in Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), free energy calculations, and coarse-grained force-fields will soon gain additional insights into the diverse roles of fusion proteins.

scholarly journals New Biophysical Approaches Reveal the Dynamics and Mechanics of Type I Viral Fusion Machinery and Their Interplay with Membranes

Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Benhaim ◽  
Kelly K. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Viral Entry ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Fusion Reaction ◽  
Type I ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins

Protein-mediated membrane fusion is a highly regulated biological process essential for cellular and organismal functions and infection by enveloped viruses. During viral entry the membrane fusion reaction is catalyzed by specialized protein machinery on the viral surface. These viral fusion proteins undergo a series of dramatic structural changes during membrane fusion where they engage, remodel, and ultimately fuse with the host membrane. The structural and dynamic nature of these conformational changes and their impact on the membranes have long-eluded characterization. Recent advances in structural and biophysical methodologies have enabled researchers to directly observe viral fusion proteins as they carry out their functions during membrane fusion. Here we review the structure and function of type I viral fusion proteins and mechanisms of protein-mediated membrane fusion. We highlight how recent technological advances and new biophysical approaches are providing unprecedented new insight into the membrane fusion reaction.

scholarly journals Reevaluating Herpes Simplex Virus Hemifusion

2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (22) ◽  
pp. 11814-11821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia O. Jackson ◽  
Richard Longnecker
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Fusion Pore ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Viral Fusion Protein ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins ◽  
Simplex Virus

ABSTRACT Membrane fusion induced by enveloped viruses proceeds through the actions of viral fusion proteins. Once activated, viral fusion proteins undergo large protein conformational changes to execute membrane fusion. Fusion is thought to proceed through a “hemifusion” intermediate in which the outer membrane leaflets of target and viral membranes mix (lipid mixing) prior to fusion pore formation, enlargement, and completion of fusion. Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) requires four glycoproteins—glycoprotein D (gD), glycoprotein B (gB), and a heterodimer of glycoprotein H and L (gH/gL)—to accomplish fusion. gD is primarily thought of as a receptor-binding protein and gB as a fusion protein. The role of gH/gL in fusion has remained enigmatic. Despite experimental evidence that gH/gL may be a fusion protein capable of inducing hemifusion in the absence of gB, the recently solved crystal structure of HSV-2 gH/gL has no structural homology to any known viral fusion protein. We found that in our hands, all HSV entry proteins—gD, gB, and gH/gL—were required to observe lipid mixing in both cell-cell- and virus-cell-based hemifusion assays. To verify that our hemifusion assay was capable of detecting hemifusion, we used glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked hemagglutinin (HA), a variant of the influenza virus fusion protein, HA, known to stall the fusion process before productive fusion pores are formed. Additionally, we found that a mutant carrying an insertion within the short gH cytoplasmic tail, 824L gH, is incapable of executing hemifusion despite normal cell surface expression. Collectively, our findings suggest that HSV gH/gL may not function as a fusion protein and that all HSV entry glycoproteins are required for both hemifusion and fusion. The previously described gH 824L mutation blocks gH/gL function prior to HSV-induced lipid mixing.

scholarly journals Multifaceted Sequence-Dependent and -Independent Roles for Reovirus FAST Protein Cytoplasmic Tails in Fusion Pore Formation and Syncytiogenesis

2009 ◽  
Vol 83 (23) ◽  
pp. 12185-12195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Barry ◽  
Roy Duncan
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Pore Formation ◽  
Syncytium Formation ◽  
Fusion Pore ◽  
Protein Fusion ◽  
Sequence Dependent ◽  
Cytoplasmic Tails ◽  
Fast Proteins ◽  
Pore Expansion

ABSTRACT Fusogenic reoviruses utilize the FAST proteins, a novel family of nonstructural viral membrane fusion proteins, to induce cell-cell fusion and syncytium formation. Unlike the paradigmatic enveloped virus fusion proteins, the FAST proteins position the majority of their mass within and internal to the membrane in which they reside, resulting in extended C-terminal cytoplasmic tails (CTs). Using tail truncations, we demonstrate that the last 8 residues of the 36-residue CT of the avian reovirus p10 FAST protein and the last 20 residues of the 68-residue CT of the reptilian reovirus p14 FAST protein enhance, but are not required for, pore expansion and syncytium formation. Further truncations indicate that the membrane-distal 12 residues of the p10 and 47 residues of the p14 CTs are essential for pore formation and that a residual tail of 21 to 24 residues that includes a conserved, membrane-proximal polybasic region present in all FAST proteins is insufficient to maintain FAST protein fusion activity. Unexpectedly, a reextension of the tail-truncated, nonfusogenic p10 and p14 constructs with scrambled versions of the deleted sequences restored pore formation and syncytiogenesis, while reextensions with heterologous sequences partially restored pore formation but failed to rescue syncytiogenesis. The membrane-distal regions of the FAST protein CTs therefore exert multiple effects on the membrane fusion reaction, serving in both sequence-dependent and sequence-independent manners as positive effectors of pore formation, pore expansion, and syncytiogenesis.

scholarly journals Mechanism of membrane fusion induced by vesicular stomatitis virus G protein

2016 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. E28-E36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene S. Kim ◽  
Simon Jenni ◽  
Megan L. Stanifer ◽  
Eatai Roth ◽  
Sean P. J. Whelan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Vesicular Stomatitis Virus ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Low Ph ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Protein Fusion ◽  
West Nile ◽  
Vesicular Stomatitis ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins

The glycoproteins (G proteins) of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and related rhabdoviruses (e.g., rabies virus) mediate both cell attachment and membrane fusion. The reversibility of their fusogenic conformational transitions differentiates them from many other low-pH-induced viral fusion proteins. We report single-virion fusion experiments, using methods developed in previous publications to probe fusion of influenza and West Nile viruses. We show that a three-stage model fits VSV single-particle fusion kinetics: (i) reversible, pH-dependent, G-protein conformational change from the known prefusion conformation to an extended, monomeric intermediate; (ii) reversible trimerization and clustering of the G-protein fusion loops, leading to an extended intermediate that inserts the fusion loops into the target-cell membrane; and (iii) folding back of a cluster of extended trimers into their postfusion conformations, bringing together the viral and cellular membranes. From simulations of the kinetic data, we conclude that the critical number of G-protein trimers required to overcome membrane resistance is 3 to 5, within a contact zone between the virus and the target membrane of 30 to 50 trimers. This sequence of conformational events is similar to those shown to describe fusion by influenza virus hemagglutinin (a “class I” fusogen) and West Nile virus envelope protein (“class II”). Our study of VSV now extends this description to “class III” viral fusion proteins, showing that reversibility of the low-pH-induced transition and architectural differences in the fusion proteins themselves do not change the basic mechanism by which they catalyze membrane fusion.

The Role of the Transmembrane and of the Intraviral Domain of Glycoproteins in Membrane Fusion of Enveloped Viruses

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 571-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Britta Schroth-Diez ◽  
Kai Ludwig ◽  
Bolormaa Baljinnyam ◽  
Christine Kozerski ◽  
Qiang Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Fusion Process ◽  
Fusion Pore ◽  
Minimum Length ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Fusion Activity ◽  
Enveloped Viruses

Fusion of enveloped viruses with their target membrane is mediated by viral integral glycoproteins. A conformational change of their ectodomain triggers membrane fusion. Several studies suggest that an extended, triple-stranded rod-shaped α-helical coiled coil resembles a common structural and functional motif of the ectodomain of fusion proteins. From that, it is believed that essential features of the fusion process are conserved among the various enveloped viruses. However, this has not been established so far for the highly conserved transmembrane and intraviral sequences of fusion proteins. The article will focus on the role of both sequences in the fusion process. Recent studies from various enveloped viruses strongly imply that a transmembrane domain with a minimum length is required for later steps of membrane fusion, i.e., the formation and enlargement of the aqueous fusion pore. Although no specific sequence of the TM is necessary for pore formation, distinct properties and motifs of the domain may be obligatory to ascertain full fusion activity. However, with some exceptions, the intraviral domain seems to be not required for fusion activity of viral fusion proteins.

scholarly journals Thermodynamically reversible paths of the first fusion intermediate reveal an important role for membrane anchors of fusion proteins

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (7) ◽  
pp. 2571-2576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuliya G. Smirnova ◽  
Herre Jelger Risselada ◽  
Marcus Müller
Keyword(s):  
Free Energy ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Biological Membrane ◽  
Fusion Reaction ◽  
Molecular Shape ◽  
Minimum Free Energy ◽  
Spontaneous Curvature ◽  
Free Energy Barrier ◽  
Lipid Species ◽  
Dynamics Simulations

Biological membrane fusion proceeds via an essential topological transition of the two membranes involved. Known players such as certain lipid species and fusion proteins are generally believed to alter the free energy and thus the rate of the fusion reaction. Quantifying these effects by theory poses a major challenge since the essential reaction intermediates are collective, diffusive and of a molecular length scale. We conducted molecular dynamics simulations in conjunction with a state-of-the-art string method to resolve the minimum free-energy path of the first fusion intermediate state, the so-called stalk. We demonstrate that the isolated transmembrane domains (TMDs) of fusion proteins such as SNARE molecules drastically lower the free energy of both the stalk barrier and metastable stalk, which is not trivially explained by molecular shape arguments. We relate this effect to the local thinning of the membrane (negative hydrophobic mismatch) imposed by the TMDs which favors the nearby presence of the highly bent stalk structure or prestalk dimple. The distance between the membranes is the most crucial determinant of the free energy of the stalk, whereas the free-energy barrier changes only slightly. Surprisingly, fusion enhancing lipids, i.e., lipids with a negative spontaneous curvature, such as PE lipids have little effect on the free energy of the stalk barrier, likely because of its single molecular nature. In contrast, the lipid shape plays a crucial role in overcoming the hydration repulsion between two membranes and thus rather lowers the total work required to form a stalk.

scholarly journals An Epitope of the Semliki Forest Virus Fusion Protein Exposed during Virus-Membrane Fusion

1999 ◽  
Vol 73 (12) ◽  
pp. 10029-10039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ahn ◽  
Matthew R. Klimjack ◽  
Prodyot K. Chatterjee ◽  
Margaret Kielian
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Semliki Forest Virus ◽  
Fusion Reaction ◽  
Ph Dependence ◽  
Fusion Peptide ◽  
Endocytic Pathway ◽  
Spike Protein ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Wide Range

ABSTRACT Semliki Forest virus (SFV) is an enveloped alphavirus that infects cells via a membrane fusion reaction triggered by acidic pH in the endocytic pathway. Fusion is mediated by the spike protein E1 subunit, an integral membrane protein that contains the viral fusion peptide and forms a stable homotrimer during fusion. We have characterized four monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific for the acid conformation of E1. These MAbs did not inhibit fusion, suggesting that they bind to an E1 region different from the fusion peptide. Competition analyses demonstrated that all four MAbs bound to spatially related sites on acid-treated virions or isolated spike proteins. To map the binding site, we selected for virus mutants resistant to one of the MAbs, E1a-1. One virus isolate, SFV 4-2, showed reduced binding of three acid-specific MAbs including E1a-1, while its binding of one acid-specific MAb as well as non-acid-specific MAbs to E1 and E2 was unchanged. The SFV 4-2 mutant was fully infectious, formed the E1 homotrimer, and had the wild-type pH dependence of infection. Sequence analysis demonstrated that the relevant mutation in SFV 4-2 was a change of E1 glycine 157 to arginine (G157R). Decreased binding of MAb E1a-1 was observed under a wide range of assay conditions, strongly suggesting that the E1 G157R mutation directly affects the MAb binding site. These data thus localize an E1 region that is normally hidden in the neutral pH structure and becomes exposed as part of the reorganization of the spike protein to its fusion-active conformation.

scholarly journals Viral Membrane Fusion and the Transmembrane Domain

Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chelsea T. Barrett ◽  
Rebecca Ellis Dutch
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Host Cell ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Transmembrane Region ◽  
Host Cell Membrane ◽  
The Past ◽  
Viral Fusion Proteins

Initiation of host cell infection by an enveloped virus requires a viral-to-host cell membrane fusion event. This event is mediated by at least one viral transmembrane glycoprotein, termed the fusion protein, which is a key therapeutic target. Viral fusion proteins have been studied for decades, and numerous critical insights into their function have been elucidated. However, the transmembrane region remains one of the most poorly understood facets of these proteins. In the past ten years, the field has made significant advances in understanding the role of the membrane-spanning region of viral fusion proteins. We summarize developments made in the past decade that have contributed to the understanding of the transmembrane region of viral fusion proteins, highlighting not only their critical role in the membrane fusion process, but further demonstrating their involvement in several aspects of the viral lifecycle.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document