Mineral carbonation for serpentine mitigation in nickel processing: a step towards industrial carbon capture and storage

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaihroz Khan ◽  
Omar Bashir Wani ◽  
Mohammad Shoaib ◽  
John Forster ◽  
Rana N. Sodhi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Froth Flotation ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Mineral Carbonation ◽  
Industrial Carbon ◽  
Nickel Recovery ◽  
And Storage

We incorporate the carbonation of ultramafic ore followed by froth-flotation to enhance nickel recovery in the beneficiation stage, instead of the traditional froth-flotation step for nickel processing.

scholarly journals Carbon Capture and Storage: A Review of Mineral Storage of CO2 in Greece

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyriaki Kelektsoglou
Keyword(s):  
Co2 Sequestration ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Mineral Carbonation ◽  
Current State ◽  
Novel Method ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2 ◽  
Carbonate Materials ◽  
And Storage

As the demand for the reduction of global emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) increases, the need for anthropogenic CO2 emission reductions becomes urgent. One promising technology to this end, is carbon capture and storage (CCS). This paper aims to provide the current state-of-the-art of CO2 capure, transport, and storage and focuses on mineral carbonation, a novel method for safe and permanent CO2 sequestration which is based on the reaction of CO2 with calcium or magnesium oxides or hydroxides to form stable carbonate materials. Current commercial scale projects of CCS around Europe are outlined, demonstrating that only three of them are in operation, and twenty-one of them are in pilot phase, including the only one case of mineral carbonation in Europe the case of CarbFix in Iceland. This paper considers the necessity of CO2 sequestration in Greece as emissions of about 64.6 million tons of CO2 annually, originate from the lignite fired power plants. A real case study concerning the mineral storage of CO2 in Greece has been conducted, demonstrating the applicability of several geological forms around Greece for mineral carbonation. The study indicates that Mount Pindos ophiolite and Vourinos ophiolite complex could be a promising means of CO2 sequestration with mineral carbonation. Further studies are needed in order to confirm this aspect.

scholarly journals Analyzing the Criteria of Efficient Carbon Capture and Separation Technologies for Sustainable Clean Energy Usage

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haibing Liu ◽  
Serhat Yüksel ◽  
Hasan Dinçer
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Clean Energy ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
New Employees ◽  
Industrial Carbon ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Storage Technologies ◽  
And Storage

This study focuses on carbon capture and distribution technology, which is a new approach to the solution of this problem. In order to use this technology more effectively, six significant criteria are defined by considering the essentials of the international Loss Control Institute and the supported literature. Moreover, the analytic network process (ANP) is applied for measuring the relative importance of each factor. The findings demonstrate that organizational factor has the greatest importance, whereas market factor is the weakest element. In addition, the education of the personnel is the most important criterion for low-cost industrial carbon dioxide capture and separation technologies. In this context, it is seen that companies need competent personnel in order to reduce the costs of these products. There are two types of strategies that companies can develop to achieve this goal. Firstly, it would be appropriate for companies to provide their staff with the necessary training on carbon capture and storage technologies. The second most important strategy is for the new personnel to be employed in the company. When choosing new employees, it is necessary to measure whether they have sufficient knowledge about this technology. These strategies will contribute to lower costs when developing products for carbon capture and storage technology.

scholarly journals Acorn: Developing full-chain industrial carbon capture and storage in a resource- and infrastructure-rich hydrocarbon province

2019 ◽  
Vol 233 ◽  
pp. 963-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Alcalde ◽  
Niklas Heinemann ◽  
Leslie Mabon ◽  
Richard H. Worden ◽  
Heleen de Coninck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Industrial Carbon ◽  
And Storage

scholarly journals Hard-to-Abate Sectors: The role of industrial carbon capture and storage (CCS) in emission mitigation

2021 ◽  
Vol 300 ◽  
pp. 117322
Author(s):  
Sergey Paltsev ◽  
Jennifer Morris ◽  
Haroon Kheshgi ◽  
Howard Herzog
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Emission Mitigation ◽  
Industrial Carbon ◽  
And Storage

The Role of Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage (Ccs) in Emission Mitigation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Farrell ◽  
Jennifer Morris ◽  
Haroon Kheshgi ◽  
Hans Thomann ◽  
Sergey Paltsev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Emission Mitigation ◽  
Industrial Carbon ◽  
And Storage

scholarly journals Economic Evaluation of Carbon Capture and Utilization Applying the Technology of Mineral Carbonation at Coal-Fired Power Plant

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (15) ◽  
pp. 6175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bong Jae Lee ◽  
Jeong Il Lee ◽  
Soo Young Yun ◽  
Cheol-Soo Lim ◽  
Young-Kwon Park
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Operating Cost ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Mineral Carbonation ◽  
Economy Of Scale ◽  
Carbon Capture And Utilization ◽  
Cost Of Energy ◽  
Energy Penalty ◽  
And Storage

Based on the operating data of a 40 tCO2/day (2 megawatt (MW)) class carbon capture and utilization (CCU) pilot plant, the scaled-up 400 tCO2/day (20 MW) class CCU plant at 500 MW power plant was economically analyzed by applying the levelized cost of energy analysis (LCOE) and CO2 avoided cost. This study shows that the LCOE and CO2 avoided cost for 400 tCO2/day class CCU plant of mineral carbonation technology were 26 USD/MWh and 64 USD/tCO2, representing low LCOE and CO2 avoided cost, compared to other carbon capture and storage CCS and CCU plants. Based on the results of this study, the LCOE and CO2 avoided cost may become lower by the economy of scale, even if the CO2 treatment capacity of the CCU plant could be extended as much as for similar businesses. Therefore, the CCU technology by mineral carbonation has an economic advantage in energy penalty, power plant construction, and operating cost over other CCS and CCU with other technology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document