Soil gas carbon dioxide probe: laboratory testing and field evaluation

2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1062
Author(s):  
B. M. Patterson ◽  
A. J. Furness ◽  
T. P. Bastow
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 2745
Author(s):  
Manoj Kumar ◽  
Ritu Dogra ◽  
Mahesh Narang ◽  
Manjit Singh ◽  
Sushant Mehan

Manual transplanting, a pre-dominant practice in almost all the paddy growing areas in India, is laborious, burdensome, and has many expenses on raising, settling, and transplanting nursery. The transplanting process’s limitations motivated the replacement of conventional paddy transplanting methods. The study was divided into two phases. The first phase included laboratory testing of three levels of metering mechanisms, namely cell type (M1) with 10 cells grooved around a circular plate having a 13 cm diameter, inclined plate (M2) containing 24 U shaped cells provided on an 18 cm diameter plate, and fluted roller (M3) with 10 flutes on a 5 cm diameter shaft. The testing matrix included a missing index, multiple index, and seed damage with forward speeds (2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 km/h), and pre-germination levels of 24 h soaked (P1), 24 h pre-germinated (P2), and 36 h pre-germinated paddy seeds (P3)). The second phase included selecting the best combination obtained from the laboratory study and developing a new efficient planter for the puddled field. The inclined plate metering mechanism operating at 2.5 km/h for 24 h pre-germinated seeds was reported most efficient from the first phase. Therefore, a self-propelled 8-row planter equipped with an inclined plate metering mechanism having a row-to-row spacing of 22.5 cm was developed, fabricated, and evaluated in the puddled field. The designed planter was assessed on two different soils: sandy loom (ST1) and clay loom (ST2) and at two different hopper fill levels as ½ filled hopper (F1) and ¾ filled hopper (F2). The number of plants per square meter and hill-to-hill spacing was measured. The on-field evaluation revealed that the number of plants per square meter was non-significantly affected by the type of soil but was significantly affected by hopper fill.


Author(s):  
Imad L. Al-Qadi ◽  
Zhen Leng ◽  
Jongeun Baek ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Matthew Doyen ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Dojchinov ◽  
Katherine A Damcevski ◽  
James D Woodman ◽  
Victoria S Haritos

Ground Water ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 598-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan G. Deyo ◽  
Gary A. Robbins ◽  
Gordon K. Binkhorst

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Cupp ◽  
Justin Smerud ◽  
John Tix ◽  
Susan Schleis ◽  
Kim Fredricks ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Regina Bernhaupt ◽  
Kristijan Mihalic ◽  
Marianna Obrist

Evaluating mobile applications and devices is particularly challenging given the variability of users, uses, and environments involved. This chapter introduces usability evaluation methods (UEMs) for mobile applications. Over the past decades various usability evaluation methods have been developed and implemented to improve and assure easy-to-use user interfaces and systems. Since most of the so-called ‘classical’ methods have demonstrated shortcomings when used in the field of mobile applications, they were broadened, varied, and changed to meet the demands of testing usability for mobile applications. This chapter presents a selection of these ‘classical’ methods and introduces some methodological variations for testing usability in the area of mobile devices and applications. It argues for a combination of both field evaluation methods and traditional laboratory testing to cover different phases in the user-centered design and development process.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2191 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamadreza Farzaneh ◽  
William H. Schneider ◽  
Josias Zietsman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document