scholarly journals Size matters for in vitro gene delivery: investigating the relationships among complexation protocol, transfection medium, size and sedimentation

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Pezzoli ◽  
Elisa Giupponi ◽  
Diego Mantovani ◽  
Gabriele Candiani
2007 ◽  
Vol 45 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Walbrun ◽  
S Netter ◽  
R Wiest ◽  
E Gäbele ◽  
J Schölmerich ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 821-830
Author(s):  
Prasad Pofali ◽  
Adrita Mondal ◽  
Vaishali Londhe

Background: Current gene therapy vectors such as viral, non-viral, and bacterial vectors, which are used for cancer treatment, but there are certain safety concerns and stability issues of these conventional vectors. Exosomes are the vesicles of size 40-100 nm secreted from multivesicular bodies into the extracellular environment by most of the cell types in-vivo and in-vitro. As a natural nanocarrier, exosomes are immunologically inert, biocompatible, and can cross biological barriers like the blood-brain barrier, intestinal barrier, and placental barrier. Objective: This review focusses on the role of exosome as a carrier to efficiently deliver a gene for cancer treatment and diagnosis. The methods for loading of nucleic acids onto the exosomes, advantages of exosomes as a smart intercellular shuttle for gene delivery and therapeutic applications as a gene delivery vector for siRNA, miRNA and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) and also the limitations of exosomes as a gene carrier are all reviewed in this article. Methods: Mostly, electroporation and chemical transfection are used to prepare gene loaded exosomes. Results: Exosome-mediated delivery is highly promising and advantageous in comparison to the current delivery methods for systemic gene therapy. Targeted exosomes, loaded with therapeutic nucleic acids, can efficiently promote the reduction of tumor proliferation without any adverse effects. Conclusion: In the near future, exosomes can become an efficient gene carrier for delivery and a biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.


FEBS Letters ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 504 (3) ◽  
pp. 99-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Lundstrom ◽  
Christophe Schweitzer ◽  
Daniel Rotmann ◽  
Danielle Hermann ◽  
Edith M. Schneider ◽  
...  

ChemInform ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Man-Zhou Zhu ◽  
Qi-Hua Wu ◽  
Guisheng Zhang ◽  
Tan Ren ◽  
Dexi Liu ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 144 (2) ◽  
pp. 239
Author(s):  
Changyi J. Chen ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Min Li ◽  
Uddalak Bharadwaj ◽  
Hong Mu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 4348-4357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Logan W. Warriner ◽  
Joseph R. Duke ◽  
Daniel W. Pack ◽  
Jason E. DeRouchey

2013 ◽  
Vol 754 ◽  
pp. 21-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeid A. Al Othman ◽  
Mohammad Mezbaul Alam ◽  
Mu. Naushad ◽  
Inamuddin ◽  
Mohd Farhan Khan

Nanomedicine is a relatively new field of science and technology. By interacting with biomolecules, therefore at nanoscale, nanotechnology opens up a vast field of research and application. Current and potential applications of nanotechnology in medicine range from research involving diagnostic devices, drug delivery vehicles to enhanced gene therapy and tissue engineering procedures. Its advantage over conventional medicine lies on its size. Operating at nanoscale allows to exploit physical properties different from those observed at microscale such as the volume/surface ratio. This allows drugs of nanosize be used in lower concentration and has an earlier onset of therapeutic action. It also provides materials for controlled drug delivery by directing carriers to a specific location. Inorganic nanomedicine is likely to remain one of the most prolific fields of nanomedicine, which refers to the use of inorganic or hybrid (inorganic-inorganic or inorganic-organic) nanomaterials (INMs) and nanoparticles (INPs) to achieve innovative medical advances for body parts implantation, drug and gene discovery and delivery, discovery of biomarkers, and molecular diagnostics. Among the most promising INMs being developed are metal, silica, dendrimers, organic-inorganic hybrids, ceramics (e.g. ZrO2, TiO2, Al2O3, etc.) and bioinorganic hybrids. Metal NP contrast agents enhance magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound results in biomedical applications of in vivo imaging. Hollow and porous INMs have been exploited for drug and gene delivery, diagnostic imaging, and photothermal therapy. Biomolecular inorganic nanohybrids and nanostructured biomaterials have been exploited for targeted imaging and therapy, drug and gene delivery, and regenerative medicine. Potential uses for fluorescent quantum dots (QDs) include cell labeling, biosensing, in vivo imaging, bimodal magnetic-luminescent imaging, and diagnostics. Biocompatible QD conjugates have been used successfully for sentinel lymph node mapping, tumor targeting, tumor angiogenesis imaging, and metastasis cell tracking. This article outlines present developments and future prospects for the use of Ti-based NPs and NMs in experimental in vivo and in vitro studies and in engineering nanodevices and biosensors for clinical and investigative use in diagnosis and therapy in diverse fields of medical sciences, such as oncology, infection control, orthopedics, dentistry, dermatology, genetics, cardiology, ophthalmology, etc. Toxicological considerations of these INPs and INMs are also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document