scholarly journals Microhabitat choice in island lizards enhances camouflage against avian predators

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate L. A. Marshall ◽  
Kate E. Philpot ◽  
Martin Stevens
2018 ◽  
Vol 285 (1880) ◽  
pp. 20180744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yifan Pei ◽  
Mihai Valcu ◽  
Bart Kempenaers

Being active at different times facilitates the coexistence of functionally similar species. Hence, time partitioning might be induced by competition. However, the relative importance of direct interference and indirect exploitation competition on time partitioning remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the relative importance of these two forms of competition on the occurrence of time-shifting among avian predator species. As a measure of interference competition pressure, we used the species richness of day-active avian predator species or of night-active avian predator species (i.e. species of Accipitriformes, Falconiformes and Strigiformes) in a particular geographical area (assemblage). As an estimate of exploitation competition pressure, we used the total species richness of avian predators in each assemblage. Estimates of the intensity of interference competition robustly predicted the number of Accipitriformes species that became crepuscular and the number of Strigiformes species that became day-active or strictly crepuscular. Interference competition pressure may depend on body size and on the total duration of the typical active period (day or night length). Our results support—to some extent—that smaller species are more likely to become time-shifters. Day length did not have an effect on the number of time-shifter species in the Accipitriformes. Among the large Strigiformes, more time-shifter species occur in areas where nights are shorter (i.e. where less of the typical time resource is available). However, in the small Strigiformes, we found the opposite, counterintuitive effect: more time-shifters where nights are longer. Exploitation competition may have had an additional positive effect on the number of time-shifters, but only in Accipitriformes, and the effect was not as robust. Our results thus support the interference competition hypothesis, suggesting that animals may have shifted their time of activity, despite phylogenetic constraints on the ability to do so, to reduce the costs of direct interactions. Our findings also highlight the influence of body size as a surrogate of competitive ability during encounters on time partitioning, at least among avian predators.


Biotropica ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Tonner ◽  
Vojtech Novotny ◽  
Jan Leps ◽  
Stanislav Komarek
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 533-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena L Zvereva ◽  
Lucia Doktorovová ◽  
Kateřina Hotová Svádová ◽  
Vitali Zverev ◽  
Pavel Štys ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janne K. Valkonen ◽  
Johanna Mappes

Several species of non-venomous snake are known to flatten their heads when disturbed, and this behaviour has been suggested to be a mimicry of vipers (Arnold & Ovenden 2002, Hailey & Davies 1986, Young et al. 1999). Using plasticine models, Guimarães & Sawaya (2011) tested the antipredatory function of a triangular head shape in snakes. Their article presents the first published empirical experiment testing the adaptive significance of vipers' triangular head shape. Guimarães & Sawaya (2011) found no support for the viper mimicry hypothesis. Accordingly, they concluded that ‘the shape of [the] head seemed not to confer advantage itself’. Although the use of plasticine models is a generally accepted method of testing predation pressure on snakes, we argue that the experiment may have failed to find the antipredatory function of triangulation due to the pooling of attacks by mammalian and avian predators. Mammals generally rely on olfactory cues during foraging. Plasticine has a strong odour which does not resemble the odour of any prey species. It is thus unlikely that mammals would treat snake replicas as true snakes.


Oikos ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erkki Korpimäki ◽  
Kai Norrdahl ◽  
Erkki Korpimaki

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document