Corrigendum: Duodenum Electrical Stimulation Delays Gastric Emptying, Reduces Food Intake and Accelerates Small Bowel Transit in Pigs

Obesity ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1317-1317
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Gastric Emptying ◽  
Food Intake ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Small Bowel Transit

scholarly journals Small bowel transit of a bran meal residue in humans: sieving of solids from liquids and response to feeding

Gut ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 685-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
J M Hebden ◽  
P E Blackshaw ◽  
A C Perkins ◽  
M D’Amato ◽  
R C Spiller
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Emptying ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Small Bowel Transit ◽  
Motor Patterns ◽  
Solid Meal ◽  
Lower Quadrant ◽  
Distal Small Bowel ◽  
Proximal Small Bowel ◽  
Indium 111 ◽  
Right Lower Quadrant

Background—Ileal motor patterns are adapted to the propulsion of viscous meal residue, such as bran, which accumulates in the distal ileum postprandially.Aims—To examine the effects of a second liquid/solid meal on ileal emptying.Subjects and methods—Eleven healthy fasting subjects consumed a 1.47 MJ pancake containing 15 g bran and 5 MBq Technetium-99m labelled amberlite resin (meal A). Gastric emptying and transit through the left upper quadrant (proximal) and right lower quadrant (distal) small bowel regions and colon were assessed scintigraphically. Transit was compared with and without a second Indium-111 liquid/solid DTPA labelled 2.28 MJ meal (B) given three hours after the first meal.Results—Gastric emptying of meal A was slower than meal B (the time for 50% of the activity to leave the stomach (T50) being 113 (11) minutes versus 48 (3) minutes respectively, p<0.01, n=11). Both meals passed rapidly through the proximal small bowel (T50 meal A = 57 (14) minutes versus T50 meal B = 42 (11) minutes). Transit of meal A through the distal small bowel was much slower (T50 more than 390 minutes versus 176 (29) minutes for meal B, p<0.01), resulting in meal B overtaking meal A and entering the colon earlier. Ingestion of the second meal (B) resulted in significantly less meal A marker entering the colon (5 (3)%) at 11 hours than when meal A was taken alone (18 (4)%) (p<0.05, n=8).Conclusions—The distal small bowel selectively retains bran, allowing liquid phase markers through to the colon. Consuming a second liquid/solid meal does not stimulate ileal transit of bran which seems to be propelled quicker by fasting motor patterns.

scholarly journals Effect of bran particle size on gastric emptying and small bowel transit in humans: a scintigraphic study.

Gut ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Vincent ◽  
A Roberts ◽  
M Frier ◽  
A C Perkins ◽  
I A MacDonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Particle Size ◽  
Gastric Emptying ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Small Bowel Transit ◽  
Scintigraphic Study

Small bowel transit and gastric emptying after biliodigestive anastomosis using the uncut jejunal loop

2003 ◽  
Vol 186 (6) ◽  
pp. 747-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Klaus ◽  
Ronald A Hinder ◽  
Justin H.H Nguyen ◽  
Kevin L Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Emptying ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Jejunal Loop ◽  
Small Bowel Transit ◽  
Biliodigestive Anastomosis

Do Motility Disorders Effect the Gastric Emptying or Small Bowel Transit Times of Capsule Endoscopy

2006 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. S506
Author(s):  
David Ramsay ◽  
Michael Frist ◽  
Christopher Entwisle ◽  
David Jager ◽  
Steven Zeddun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Emptying ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Small Bowel Transit ◽  
Motility Disorders ◽  
Transit Times
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document