Identification of the transporter responsible for sucrose accumulation in sugar beet taproots

Nature Plants ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Jung ◽  
Frank Ludewig ◽  
Alexander Schulz ◽  
Garvin Meißner ◽  
Nicole Wöstefeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Sucrose Accumulation

Sugar beet root as an organ for sucrose accumulation

1981 ◽  
pp. 209-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina P. Kholodova ◽  
Yuliya P. Bolyakina ◽  
Anatoli B. Meshcheriakov ◽  
Marina S. Orlova
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Sucrose Accumulation ◽  
Beet Root ◽  
Sugar Beet Root

Sucrose Accumulation in Sugar Beet: From Fodder Beet Selection to Genomic Selection

Sugar Tech ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 635-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parviz Fasahat ◽  
Mohsen Aghaeezadeh ◽  
Leila Jabbari ◽  
Saeed Sadeghzadeh Hemayati ◽  
Paul Townson
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Sucrose Accumulation ◽  
Fodder Beet

scholarly journals Transcriptomic profiling of taproot growth and sucrose accumulation in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) at different developmental stages

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. e0175454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Feng Zhang ◽  
Guo-Long Li ◽  
Xue-Feng Wang ◽  
Ya-Qing Sun ◽  
Shao-Ying Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Beta Vulgaris ◽  
Developmental Stages ◽  
Sucrose Accumulation ◽  
Transcriptomic Profiling

Growth of sugar-beet crops including the influence of synthetic plant growth regulators

1986 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. F. Green ◽  
L. V. Vaidyanathan ◽  
J. D. Ivins
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Plant Growth Regulators ◽  
Growth Regulators ◽  
Specific Leaf Area ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Biomass Accumulation ◽  
Sucrose Accumulation ◽  
Dry Matter Partitioning

SummaryObservations are presented from a crop of sugar beet grown in Cambridgeshire during 1978, and a field trial at Sutton Bonington during 1985 in which the influence of synthetic plant growth regulators (PGRs) daminozide, chlormequat, GA4+7 and ethephon were compared.Several distinct patterns of growth were evident, being similar for both growing seasons and described by two intersecting straight lines. Early development was characterized by a slow rate of biomass accumulation, a dominance of foliage production with a constant but small root fraction (around 40%), a low specific leaf area and a slow but conservative rate of sucrose fractionation. Later in the season the rate of stand growth was both constant and maximal, the root fraction doubled, specific leaf area increased and the rate of sucrose accumulation rose markedly.Transitions between developmental phases occurred at various times dependent on variate under consideration. The onset of the main growth period began at the end of June, followed by an increase in the rate of sucrose accumulation about 2 weeks later. Finally, near the end of July, partition of assimilate into the root assumed a faster rate. Changes in the partitioning into both roots and sucrose are discussed in relation to the development of the secondary cambium.Generally there were no effects of PGRs on biomass accumulation, dry-matter partitioning, specific leaf area and sucrose accumulation. However, daminozide increased early canopy expansion and early dry-matter production but failed to influence biomass or sugar yield.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document