scholarly journals International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theo H van der Kwast ◽  
◽  
Mahul B Amin ◽  
Athanase Billis ◽  
Jonathan I Epstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
International Society ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Consensus Conference ◽  
Group 2

Disease Progression in Bladder Cancer: Which Developments since 1994

2009 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-117
Author(s):  
V. Varca ◽  
A. Simonato ◽  
P. Traverso ◽  
A. Romagnoli ◽  
F. Venzano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Node Dissection ◽  
Group 2

Objectives The introduction of PSA in clinical practice has resulted in decreasing the death rate form prostate cancer and in a downward shift of the pathological stage in radical prostatectomy specimens. This seems not to be the case for bladder cancer. In order to verify this assumption, we have reviewed the charts of the patients operated on of radical prostatectomy and radical cystectomy between 1994 and 2006. Methods 456 and 491 consecutive patients, respectively, underwent radical cystectomy and radical prostatectomy with bilateral lymph nodes dissection. We excluded all the patients who had received neoadjuvant treatment or did not undergo node dissection. The patients were divided into two consecutive groups according to the year of treatment: group 1 included pts treated from 1994 to 2000, and group 2 pts from 2001 to 2006. The histopathological findings of the two groups of pts were compared. The difference among TNM systems has been balanced evaluating histopathological reports critically and converting them to the 2002 edition. Results For patients with prostate cancer, those in group 2 had a decrease in the incidence of extracapsular extension and lymph nodes invasion. The bladder cancer patients belonging to group 2 had a greater number of T2, but there was an increased number of pN+ in this group. Conclusions Even if there is a decline in locally advanced disease in patients with bladder cancer, our retrospective analysis did not show a comparable success in early diagnosis as it did for prostate cancer. There is undoubtedly an increase in the lymph node dissemination, whether this is due to a more extended lymph node dissection or to a premature dissemination remains questionable. Public awareness regarding bladder cancer and its risk factors is limited, but several studies have reported that a delay in diagnosis of invasive bladder cancer is an adverse prognostic factor. A higher care in the development of new diagnostic markers for bladder tumors and especially in the screening protocols together with an earlier radical therapy could hopefully improve the management of such a pathology, as it happened for prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Clinical and pathological variables that predict changes in tumour grade after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stavros Sfoungaristos ◽  
Petros Perimenis
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Psa Density ◽  
Group 2

Introduction: Preoperative Gleason score is crucial, in combination with other preoperative parameters, in selecting the appropriate treatment for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. The aim of the present study is to determine the clinical and pathological variables that can predict differences in Gleason score between biopsy and radical prostatectomy.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 302 patients who had a radical prostatectomy between January 2005 and September 2010. The association between grade changes and preoperative Gleason score, age, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, number of biopsy cores, presence of prostatitis and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was analyzed. We also conducted a secondary analysis of the factors that influence upgrading in patients with preoperative Gleason score ≤6 (group 1) and downgrading in patients with Gleason score ≤7 (group 2).Results: No difference in Gleason score was noted in 44.3% of patients, while a downgrade was noted in 13.7% and upgrade in 42.1%. About 2/3 of patients with a Gleason score of ≤6 upgraded after radical prostatectomy. PSA density (p = 0.008) and prostate volume (p = 0.032) were significantly correlated with upgrade. No significant predictors were found for patients with Gleason score ≤7 who downgraded postoperatively.Conclusion: Smaller prostate volume and higher values of PSA density are predictors for upgrade in patients with biopsy Gleason score ≤6 and this should be considered when deferred treatment modalities are planned.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document