scholarly journals Comment on ‘Silicone oil removal after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: comparing techniques’

Eye ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1276-1276 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Wong ◽  
E Lee ◽  
M Shunmugam
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Detachment ◽  
Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment ◽  
Silicone Oil ◽  
Oil Removal ◽  
Silicone Oil Removal

scholarly journals Supine positioning after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments with inferior retinal breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Mohammed Elsayed Abdelkader ◽  
Hossam Youssef Abouelkheir
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Detachment ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment ◽  
Silicone Oil ◽  
The Other ◽  
Oil Removal ◽  
Silicone Oil Removal ◽  
Retinal Breaks ◽  
Pars Plana ◽  
Oil Injection

Abstract Background To evaluate the effectiveness of face up position (FUP) following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and silicone oil injection in cases of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) with multiple peripheral and inferior breaks. Method Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients with RRD due to multiple peripheral breaks were managed with PPV and silicone oil as endotamponade. Postoperatively, all patients were instructed to assume face up (supine) position for at least 10 days. Silicone oil was removed 3 to 6 months postoperatively in eyes with attached retina and the patients were followed up for 6 months. Results Thirty eyes (94%) got a successful attachment of the retina and remained attached after silicone oil removal. One case showed lower redetachment under silicone oil while the other case showed recurrent RRD after silicone oil removal. Conclusion Although postoperative FUP is not a popular one, it is effective in the treatment of RRD with peripheral breaks whatever the number or the distribution of these breaks. This may in some way or another change the traditional trends of postoperative positioning after vitrectomy for RRD.

Risk Factors for Redetachment and Worse Visual Outcome after Silicone Oil Removal in Eyes with Complicated Retinal Detachment

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 627-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Goezinne ◽  
E.C. La Heij ◽  
T.T.J.M. Berendschot ◽  
A.T.A. Liem ◽  
F. Hendrikse
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Retinal Detachment ◽  
Silicone Oil ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Oil Removal ◽  
Silicone Oil Removal ◽  
Male Sex ◽  
Anatomic Success

Purpose The goal of this study was to identify risk factors for redetachment and/or a worse visual outcome after silicone oil removal (SOR) for complicated retinal detachment. Methods The authors retrospectively analyzed 287 consecutive eyes with SOR between January 1999 and December 2003. Results Anatomic success after SOR was achieved in 81% of the eyes. The overall anatomic success at the end of follow-up was 94%. Postoperative ocular hypertension was found in 8% of the eyes, hypotony in 6% of the eyes, and keratopathy in 29% of the eyes. After SOR 43% of the eyes had an improvement in visual acuity of at least two Snellen lines. After multivariate analysis, male sex, the presence of preoperative rubeosis, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) were found to be risk factors for recurrent retinal detachment. Male sex, preoperative visual acuity of <0.1 Snellen lines, PDR, the performance of three more operations, any size of retinectomy, and hypotony were found to be associated with a poor visual outcome of Snellen visual acuity <0.1. Conclusions Retinal detachment after SOR in the current unselected series of eyes occurred in approximately 20%, which is comparable to the Silicone Oil Study reports, published approximately 20 years ago. However, preoperative selection was then made, and less than 50% of the silicone oil-filled eyes had SOR. The higher overall anatomic success in the current study may be due to improved vitreoretinal surgical techniques.

A Case of Retinal Detachment in Retinitis Pigmentosa

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.N. Demir ◽  
N. Ünlü ◽  
Z. Yalniz ◽  
M.A. Acar ◽  
F. Örnek
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Detachment ◽  
Retinitis Pigmentosa ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment ◽  
Silicone Oil ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Scleral Buckling ◽  
Oil Removal ◽  
Pars Plana ◽  
The Right

Purpose To report case of retinitis pigmentosa in association with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Methods An eight year old boy complained of a sudden visual loss. The patient had night blindness, bone spicule-like hyperpigmentation, pale optic disc in both eyes, and the retina was totally detached in the right eye. Results He was initially treated with conventional scleral buckling surgery, then pars plana vitrectomy with silicone tamponade was performed and retinal reattachment was established. After the phacoemulsification combined with silicone oil removal the final visual acuity of counting fingers was obtained. Conclusions The association of retinitis pigmentosa and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment is uncommon in young patients.

Endoscopy-Assisted Vitrectomy Outcomes During Silicone Oil Removal After Complex Retinal Detachment Repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 445-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Vila ◽  
Emmanouil Rampakakis ◽  
Flavio Rezende
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Retinal Detachment ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Silicone Oil ◽  
Endoscopic Examination ◽  
Oil Removal ◽  
Visualization System ◽  
Silicone Oil Removal ◽  
Pars Plana ◽  
The Mean

Purpose: This retrospective study recorded intraoperative findings during silicone oil removal and postoperative anatomical outcomes comparing endoscopy-assisted pars plana vitrectomy (E-PPV) vs pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) alone after proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR)-related retinal detachment (RD) repair. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent PPV for silicone oil removal after RD with PVR from July 2009 to January 2017. Patients with diabetic tractional RD, history of trauma, uveitis, or endophthalmitis were excluded. After 2013, an endoscopic visualization system (E2 MicroProbe; Endo Optiks) was used in a nonrandomized fashion. Data collection included reattachment rate, intraoperative endoscopic findings and phthisis rate. Results: Fifty-four eyes of 54 patients were included. The mean participant age was 58.4 ± 12.9 years and 36 (65.5%) participants were male. The mean (± SD) follow-up duration after oil removal was 24.3 ± 20.1 months. E-PPV combined with wide-angle visualization system was performed in 26 (48.1%) of the patients; the surgical management was modified after endoscopic examination in 17 (65.4%) of the cases. Reattachment rate in the E-PPV group was 96.2% compared with 76.0% in the PPV-alone group ( P = .04). Conclusions: E-PPV for silicone oil removal appears to be advantageous for prevention of RD recurrence, thus achieving better reattachment rates. A thorough examination is facilitated by endoscopic visualization and contributory factors for anterior PVR can be identified and treated.

scholarly journals Silicone Oil Reinjection without Macular Buckling for Treatment of Recurrent Myopic Macular Hole Retinal Detachment after Silicone Oil Removal

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hammouda Hamdy Ghoraba ◽  
Sameh Mohamed Elgouhary ◽  
Hosam Osman Mansour
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Detachment ◽  
Macular Hole ◽  
Silicone Oil ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Oil Removal ◽  
Interventional Study ◽  
Silicone Oil Removal ◽  
Macular Hole Retinal Detachment ◽  
Medical Reports ◽  
Myopic Macular Hole

Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy of silicone oil (S.O) reinjection without macular buckling for treatment of recurrent myopic macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) after silicone oil removal.Methods. A retrospective consecutive interventional study from medical reports on cases of myopic MHRD. Fifty-three eyes of 51 patients underwent silicone oil removal after successful repair of MHRD were reviewed. The main outcomes were the retinal status after silicone oil removal and management of recurrent cases.Results. The rate of recurrent RD (Re RD) after silicone oil removal was 11.3% (6 out of 53 eyes). One case refused any other interference. In the remaining 5 eyes, 4 eyes (80%) could be reattached by S.O re-injection and one eye (20%) developed Re RD after S.O re-injection. Range of followup after management of recurrence was 5–53 months (mean 18.7 months).Conclusions. This case series concluded that the risk factors for recurrent RD after silicone oil removal from cases of myopic MHRD were high myopia, open flat MH, and large posterior staphyloma. Revision of vitrectomy and S.O re-injection can reattach most of recurrent cases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document