scholarly journals DNA damage response by single-strand breaks in terminally differentiated muscle cells and the control of muscle integrity

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 1741-1749 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Fortini ◽  
C Ferretti ◽  
B Pascucci ◽  
L Narciso ◽  
D Pajalunga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Muscle Cells ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

scholarly journals Single-Strand Break End Resection in Genome Integrity: Mechanism and Regulation by APE2

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 2389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Hossain ◽  
Yunfeng Lin ◽  
Shan Yan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Single Strand Break ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
End Resection

DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) occur more than 10,000 times per mammalian cell each day, representing the most common type of DNA damage. Unrepaired SSBs compromise DNA replication and transcription programs, leading to genome instability. Unrepaired SSBs are associated with diseases such as cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. Although canonical SSB repair pathway is activated to repair most SSBs, it remains unclear whether and how unrepaired SSBs are sensed and signaled. In this review, we propose a new concept of SSB end resection for genome integrity. We propose a four-step mechanism of SSB end resection: SSB end sensing and processing, as well as initiation, continuation, and termination of SSB end resection. We also compare different mechanisms of SSB end resection and DSB end resection in DNA repair and DNA damage response (DDR) pathways. We further discuss how SSB end resection contributes to SSB signaling and repair. We focus on the mechanism and regulation by APE2 in SSB end resection in genome integrity. Finally, we identify areas of future study that may help us gain further mechanistic insight into the process of SSB end resection. Overall, this review provides the first comprehensive perspective on SSB end resection in genome integrity.

scholarly journals Sae2 antagonizes Rad9 accumulation at DNA double-strand breaks to attenuate checkpoint signaling and facilitate end resection

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (51) ◽  
pp. E11961-E11969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tai-Yuan Yu ◽  
Michael T. Kimble ◽  
Lorraine S. Symington
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Inhibitory Effects ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Synthetic Lethal ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
End Resection

The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2NBS1 complex plays important roles in the DNA damage response by activating the Tel1ATM kinase and catalyzing 5′–3′ resection at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). To initiate resection, Mre11 endonuclease nicks the 5′ strands at DSB ends in a reaction stimulated by Sae2CtIP. Accordingly, Mre11-nuclease deficient (mre11-nd) and sae2Δ mutants are expected to exhibit similar phenotypes; however, we found several notable differences. First, sae2Δ cells exhibit greater sensitivity to genotoxins than mre11-nd cells. Second, sae2Δ is synthetic lethal with sgs1Δ, whereas the mre11-nd sgs1Δ mutant is viable. Third, Sae2 attenuates the Tel1-Rad53CHK2 checkpoint and antagonizes Rad953BP1 accumulation at DSBs independent of Mre11 nuclease. We show that Sae2 competes with other Tel1 substrates, thus reducing Rad9 binding to chromatin and to Rad53. We suggest that persistent Sae2 binding at DSBs in the mre11-nd mutant counteracts the inhibitory effects of Rad9 and Rad53 on Exo1 and Dna2-Sgs1–mediated resection, accounting for the different phenotypes conferred by mre11-nd and sae2Δ mutations. Collectively, these data show a resection initiation independent role for Sae2 at DSBs by modulating the DNA damage checkpoint.

scholarly journals APE2 promotes DNA damage response pathway from a single-strand break

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 2479-2494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunfeng Lin ◽  
Liping Bai ◽  
Steven Cupello ◽  
Md Akram Hossain ◽  
Bradley Deem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Single Strand Break ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Dna Damage Response Pathway

scholarly journals DNA-PKcs: A Multi-Faceted Player in DNA Damage Response

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqiao Yue ◽  
Chenjun Bai ◽  
Dafei Xie ◽  
Teng Ma ◽  
Ping-Kun Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Phosphatidylinositol 3 Kinase ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Functional Complex ◽  
Dependent Protein ◽  
Cellular Dna

DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) is a member of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase related kinase family, which can phosphorylate more than 700 substrates. As the core enzyme, DNA-PKcs forms the active DNA-PK holoenzyme with the Ku80/Ku70 heterodimer to play crucial roles in cellular DNA damage response (DDR). Once DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) occur in the cells, DNA-PKcs is promptly recruited into damage sites and activated. DNA-PKcs is auto-phosphorylated and phosphorylated by Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated at multiple sites, and phosphorylates other targets, participating in a series of DDR and repair processes, which determine the cells’ fates: DSBs NHEJ repair and pathway choice, replication stress response, cell cycle checkpoints, telomeres length maintenance, senescence, autophagy, etc. Due to the special and multi-faceted roles of DNA-PKcs in the cellular responses to DNA damage, it is important to precisely regulate the formation and dynamic of its functional complex and activities for guarding genomic stability. On the other hand, targeting DNA-PKcs has been considered as a promising strategy of exploring novel radiosensitizers and killing agents of cancer cells. Combining DNA-PKcs inhibitors with radiotherapy can effectively enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy, offering more possibilities for cancer therapy.

scholarly journals Recent advances in the nucleolar responses to DNA double-strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (17) ◽  
pp. 9449-9461
Author(s):  
Lea Milling Korsholm ◽  
Zita Gál ◽  
Blanca Nieto ◽  
Oliver Quevedo ◽  
Stavroula Boukoura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Repetitive Sequences ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

Abstract DNA damage poses a serious threat to human health and cells therefore continuously monitor and repair DNA lesions across the genome. Ribosomal DNA is a genomic domain that represents a particular challenge due to repetitive sequences, high transcriptional activity and its localization in the nucleolus, where the accessibility of DNA repair factors is limited. Recent discoveries have significantly extended our understanding of how cells respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the nucleolus, and new kinases and multiple down-stream targets have been identified. Restructuring of the nucleolus can occur as a consequence of DSBs and new data point to an active regulation of this process, challenging previous views. Furthermore, new insights into coordination of cell cycle phases and ribosomal DNA repair argue against existing concepts. In addition, the importance of nucleolar-DNA damage response (n-DDR) mechanisms for maintenance of genome stability and the potential of such factors as anti-cancer targets is becoming apparent. This review will provide a detailed discussion of recent findings and their implications for our understanding of the n-DDR. The n-DDR shares features with the DNA damage response (DDR) elsewhere in the genome but is also emerging as an independent response unique to ribosomal DNA and the nucleolus.

scholarly journals CDK and Mec1/Tel1-catalyzed phosphorylation of Sae2 regulate different responses to DNA damage

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (21) ◽  
pp. 11238-11249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tai-Yuan Yu ◽  
Valerie E Garcia ◽  
Lorraine S Symington
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Physiological Role ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Checkpoint Kinases ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
End Resection

Abstract Sae2 functions in the DNA damage response by controlling Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX)-catalyzed end resection, an essential step for homology-dependent repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs), and by attenuating DNA damage checkpoint signaling. Phosphorylation of Sae2 by cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK1/Cdc28) activates the Mre11 endonuclease, while the physiological role of Sae2 phosphorylation by Mec1 and Tel1 checkpoint kinases is not fully understood. Here, we compare the phenotype of sae2 mutants lacking the main CDK (sae2-S267A) or Mec1 and Tel1 phosphorylation sites (sae2-5A) with sae2Δ and Mre11 nuclease defective (mre11-nd) mutants. The phosphorylation-site mutations confer DNA damage sensitivity, but not to the same extent as sae2Δ. The sae2-S267A mutation is epistatic to mre11-nd for camptothecin (CPT) sensitivity and synergizes with sgs1Δ, whereas sae2-5A synergizes with mre11-nd and exhibits epistasis with sgs1Δ. We find that attenuation of checkpoint signaling by Sae2 is mostly independent of Mre11 endonuclease activation but requires Mec1 and Tel1-dependent phosphorylation of Sae2. These results support a model whereby CDK-catalyzed phosphorylation of Sae2 activates resection via Mre11 endonuclease, whereas Sae2 phosphorylation by Mec1 and Tel1 promotes resection by the Dna2-Sgs1 and Exo1 pathways indirectly by dampening the DNA damage response.

scholarly journals Damage-induced lncRNAs control the DNA damage response through interaction with DDRNAs at individual double-strand breaks

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1400-1411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flavia Michelini ◽  
Sethuramasundaram Pitchiaya ◽  
Valerio Vitelli ◽  
Sheetal Sharma ◽  
Ubaldo Gioia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document