scholarly journals Damage-induced lncRNAs control the DNA damage response through interaction with DDRNAs at individual double-strand breaks

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1400-1411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flavia Michelini ◽  
Sethuramasundaram Pitchiaya ◽  
Valerio Vitelli ◽  
Sheetal Sharma ◽  
Ubaldo Gioia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

scholarly journals Sae2 antagonizes Rad9 accumulation at DNA double-strand breaks to attenuate checkpoint signaling and facilitate end resection

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (51) ◽  
pp. E11961-E11969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tai-Yuan Yu ◽  
Michael T. Kimble ◽  
Lorraine S. Symington
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Inhibitory Effects ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Synthetic Lethal ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
End Resection

The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2NBS1 complex plays important roles in the DNA damage response by activating the Tel1ATM kinase and catalyzing 5′–3′ resection at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). To initiate resection, Mre11 endonuclease nicks the 5′ strands at DSB ends in a reaction stimulated by Sae2CtIP. Accordingly, Mre11-nuclease deficient (mre11-nd) and sae2Δ mutants are expected to exhibit similar phenotypes; however, we found several notable differences. First, sae2Δ cells exhibit greater sensitivity to genotoxins than mre11-nd cells. Second, sae2Δ is synthetic lethal with sgs1Δ, whereas the mre11-nd sgs1Δ mutant is viable. Third, Sae2 attenuates the Tel1-Rad53CHK2 checkpoint and antagonizes Rad953BP1 accumulation at DSBs independent of Mre11 nuclease. We show that Sae2 competes with other Tel1 substrates, thus reducing Rad9 binding to chromatin and to Rad53. We suggest that persistent Sae2 binding at DSBs in the mre11-nd mutant counteracts the inhibitory effects of Rad9 and Rad53 on Exo1 and Dna2-Sgs1–mediated resection, accounting for the different phenotypes conferred by mre11-nd and sae2Δ mutations. Collectively, these data show a resection initiation independent role for Sae2 at DSBs by modulating the DNA damage checkpoint.

scholarly journals Recent advances in the nucleolar responses to DNA double-strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (17) ◽  
pp. 9449-9461
Author(s):  
Lea Milling Korsholm ◽  
Zita Gál ◽  
Blanca Nieto ◽  
Oliver Quevedo ◽  
Stavroula Boukoura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Repetitive Sequences ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

Abstract DNA damage poses a serious threat to human health and cells therefore continuously monitor and repair DNA lesions across the genome. Ribosomal DNA is a genomic domain that represents a particular challenge due to repetitive sequences, high transcriptional activity and its localization in the nucleolus, where the accessibility of DNA repair factors is limited. Recent discoveries have significantly extended our understanding of how cells respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the nucleolus, and new kinases and multiple down-stream targets have been identified. Restructuring of the nucleolus can occur as a consequence of DSBs and new data point to an active regulation of this process, challenging previous views. Furthermore, new insights into coordination of cell cycle phases and ribosomal DNA repair argue against existing concepts. In addition, the importance of nucleolar-DNA damage response (n-DDR) mechanisms for maintenance of genome stability and the potential of such factors as anti-cancer targets is becoming apparent. This review will provide a detailed discussion of recent findings and their implications for our understanding of the n-DDR. The n-DDR shares features with the DNA damage response (DDR) elsewhere in the genome but is also emerging as an independent response unique to ribosomal DNA and the nucleolus.

Heterochromatin and the DNA damage response: the need to relaxThis paper is one of a selection of papers in a Special Issue entitled 31st Annual International Asilomar Chromatin and Chromosomes Conference, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendra L. Cann ◽  
Graham Dellaire
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Atm Kinase ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Chromosomal Mutations

Higher order chromatin structure has an impact on all nuclear functions, including the DNA damage response. Over the past several years, it has become increasingly clear that heterochromatin and euchromatin represent separate entities with respect to both damage sensitivity and repair. The chromatin compaction present in heterochromatin helps to protect this DNA from damage; however, when lesions do occur, the compaction restricts the ability of DNA damage response proteins to access the site, as evidenced by its ability to block the expansion of H2AX phosphorylation. As such, DNA damage in heterochromatin is refractory to repair, which requires the surrounding chromatin structure to be decondensed. In the case of DNA double-strand breaks, this relaxation is at least partially mediated by the ATM kinase phosphorylating and inhibiting the function of the transcriptional repressor KAP1. This review will focus on the functions of KAP1 and other proteins involved in the maintenance or restriction of heterochromatin, including HP1 and TIP60, in the DNA damage response. As heterochromatin is important for maintaining genomic stability, cells must maintain a delicate balance between allowing repair factors access to these regions and ensuring that these regions retain their organization to prevent increased DNA damage and chromosomal mutations.

scholarly journals SET8 Is a Potential Therapeutic Target in MM

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4435-4435
Author(s):  
Herviou Laurie ◽  
Fanny Izard ◽  
Elke De Bruyne ◽  
Eva Desmedt ◽  
Anqi Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Myeloma Cells ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

Abstract Epigenetic regulation mechanisms - such as histone marks, DNA methylation and miRNA - are often misregulated in cancers and are associated with tumorigenesis and drug resistance. Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell disease that accumulates within the bone marrow. Epigenetic modifications in MM are associated not only with cancer development and progression, but also with resistance to chemotherapy. This epigenetic plasticity can be targeted with epidrugs, nowadays used in treatment of several cancers. We recently identified a significant overexpression of the lysine histone methyltransferase SETD8 in MM cells (HMCLs; N=40) compared with normal plasma cells (N=5) (P<0.001). SETD8 (also known as SET8, PR-Set7, KMT5A) is the sole enzyme responsible for the monomethylation of histone H4 at lysine 20 (H4K20me1) which has been linked to chromatin compaction and cell-cycle regulation. In addition, SETD8 induces the methylation of non-histone proteins, such as the replication factor PCNA, the tumor suppressor P53 and its stabilizing protein Numb. While SETD8-mediated methylation of P53 and Numb inhibits apoptosis, PCNA methylation upon SETD8 enhances the interaction with the Flap endonuclease FEN1 and promotes cancer cell proliferation. SETD8 is also implicated in DNA damage response, helping 53BP1 recruitment at DNA double-strand breaks. Consistent with this, overexpression of SETD8 is found in various types of cancer and has been directly implicated in breast cancer invasiveness and metastasis. A role of SETD8 in development of MM has however never been described. We found that high SETD8 expression is associated with a poor prognosis in 2 independent cohorts of newly diagnosed patients (UAMS-TT2 cohort - N=345 and UAMS-TT3 cohort - N=158). Specific SETD8 inhibition with UNC-0379 inhibitor, causing its degradation and H4K20me1 depletion, leads to significant growth inhibition of HMCLs (N=10) and the murine cell lines 5T33MM and 5TGM1. MM cells treated with UNC-0379 presented a G0/G1 cell cycle arrest after 24h of treatment, followed by apoptosis 48h later. To confirm that SETD8 inhibition is as efficient on primary MM cells from patients, primary MM cells (N=8) were co-cultured with their bone marrow microenvironment and recombinant IL-6 and treated for 4 days with UNC-0379. Interestingly, treatment of MM patient samples with UNC-0379 reduces the percentage of myeloma cells (65%; P<0.005) without significantly affecting the non-myeloma cells, suggesting a specific addiction of primary myeloma cells to SETD8 activity. Melphalan is an alkylating agent commonly used in MM treatment. As SETD8 is known to be involved in the DNA damage response, we investigated the effect of its combination with Melphalan on HMCLs. Results show that this particular drug combination strongly enhances double strand breaks in HMCLs monitored using 53BP1 foci formation and gH2AX detection. This result emphasizes a potential role of SETD8 in DNA repair in MM cells. Furthermore, GSEA analysis of patients with high SETD8 expression highlighted a significant enrichment of genes involved in DNA repair, MYC-MAX targets and MAPK pathway. Our study is the first to demonstrate the importance of SETD8 for MM cells survival and suggest that SETD8 inhibition represent a promising strategy to improve conventional treatment of MM with DNA damaging agents. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Attenuating the DNA damage response to double-strand breaks restores function in models of CNS neurodegeneration

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard I Tuxworth ◽  
Matthew J Taylor ◽  
Ane Martin Anduaga ◽  
Alaa Hussien-Ali ◽  
Sotiroula Chatzimatthaiou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Neurological Disorders ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Ganglion Neurons

Abstract DNA double-strand breaks are a feature of many acute and long-term neurological disorders, including neurodegeneration, following neurotrauma and after stroke. Persistent activation of the DNA damage response in response to double-strand breaks contributes to neural dysfunction and pathology as it can force post-mitotic neurons to re-enter the cell cycle leading to senescence or apoptosis. Mature, non-dividing neurons may tolerate low levels of DNA damage, in which case muting the DNA damage response might be neuroprotective. Here, we show that attenuating the DNA damage response by targeting the meiotic recombination 11, Rad50, Nijmegen breakage syndrome 1 complex, which is involved in double-strand break recognition, is neuroprotective in three neurodegeneration models in Drosophila and prevents Aβ1-42-induced loss of synapses in embryonic hippocampal neurons. Attenuating the DNA damage response after optic nerve injury is also neuroprotective to retinal ganglion cells and promotes dramatic regeneration of their neurites both in vitro and in vivo. Dorsal root ganglion neurons similarly regenerate when the DNA damage response is targeted in vitro and in vivo and this strategy also induces significant restoration of lost function after spinal cord injury. We conclude that muting the DNA damage response in the nervous system is neuroprotective in multiple neurological disorders. Our results point to new therapies to maintain or repair the nervous system.

scholarly journals Nuclear phosphorylated Dicer processes double-stranded RNA in response to DNA damage

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (8) ◽  
pp. 2373-2389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaspar Burger ◽  
Margarita Schlackow ◽  
Martin Potts ◽  
Svenja Hester ◽  
Shabaz Mohammed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Noncoding Rna ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Double Stranded Rna ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Small Noncoding Rna ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Carboxy Terminal

The endoribonuclease Dicer is a key component of the human RNA interference pathway and is known for its role in cytoplasmic microRNA production. Recent findings suggest that noncanonical Dicer generates small noncoding RNA to mediate the DNA damage response (DDR). Here, we show that human Dicer is phosphorylated in the platform–Piwi/Argonaute/Zwille–connector helix cassette (S1016) upon induction of DNA damage. Phosphorylated Dicer (p-Dicer) accumulates in the nucleus and is recruited to DNA double-strand breaks. We further demonstrate that turnover of damage-induced nuclear, double-stranded (ds) RNA requires additional phosphorylation of carboxy-terminal Dicer residues (S1728 and S1852). DNA damage-induced nuclear Dicer accumulation is conserved in mammals. Dicer depletion causes endogenous DNA damage and delays the DDR by impaired recruitment of repair factors MDC1 and 53BP1. Collectively, we place Dicer within the context of the DDR by demonstrating a DNA damage-inducible phosphoswitch that causes localized processing of nuclear dsRNA by p-Dicer to promote DNA repair.

scholarly journals PARP activation regulates the RNA-binding protein NONO in the DNA damage response to DNA double-strand breaks

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (20) ◽  
pp. 10287-10301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Krietsch ◽  
Marie-Christine Caron ◽  
Jean-Philippe Gagné ◽  
Chantal Ethier ◽  
Julien Vignard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Binding Protein ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Parp Activation ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

scholarly journals Suboptimal extracellular pH values alter DNA damage response to induced double-strand breaks

FEBS Open Bio ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 416-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Massonneau ◽  
Camille Ouellet ◽  
Fabrice Lucien ◽  
Claire M. Dubois ◽  
Jessica Tyler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Extracellular Ph ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Ph Values ◽  
Damage Response
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document