scholarly journals KRAS and BRAF mutations are prognostic biomarkers in patients undergoing lung metastasectomy of colorectal cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 720-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Renaud ◽  
B Romain ◽  
P-E Falcoz ◽  
A Olland ◽  
N Santelmo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Biomarkers ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Lung Metastasectomy

scholarly journals F-077 * KRAS AND BRAF MUTATIONS ARE PROGNOSTIC BIOMARKERS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LUNG METASTASECTOMY OF COLORECTAL CANCER

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. S20-S20
Author(s):  
S. Renaud ◽  
B. Romain ◽  
P. E. Falcoz ◽  
A. Olland ◽  
N. Santelmo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Biomarkers ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Lung Metastasectomy

scholarly journals Reply: Comment on ‘KRAS and BRAF mutations are prognostic biomarkers in patients undergoing lung metastasectomy of colo-rectal cancer’

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (11) ◽  
pp. 1637-1638
Author(s):  
Stéphane Renaud ◽  
Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz ◽  
Benoit Romain ◽  
Anne Olland ◽  
Nicola Santelmo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Biomarkers ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Lung Metastasectomy

A Critical Review of Second-generation anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibodies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Sur ◽  
Andrei Havasi ◽  
Alecsandra Gorzo ◽  
Claudia Burz
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Ongoing Research

Background: Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become a relevant solution for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Current anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies face a series of problems, including resistance and non-durable response, and RAS and BRAF mutations serve as exclusion criteria for treatment with anti-EGFR mAbs. Advances in molecular tumor profiling and information on subsequent pathways responsible for disease progression and drug resistance helped develop a new generation of anti-EGFR mAbs. These second-generation mAbs have been developed to overcome existing resistance mechanisms and to limit common side effects. For the moment, existing literature suggests that these novel anti-EGFR mAbs are far from finding their way to clinical practice soon. Objective: In this review, we summarize and evaluate current data regarding ongoing research and completed clinical trials for different second-generation anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Conclusion: Anti-EGFR mAbs exhibit efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer, but second-generation mAbs failed to prove their benefit in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Understanding the biological basis of primary and acquired drug resistance could allow scientists to design better clinical trials and develop improved second-generation mAbs.

Predictive and prognostic biomarkers with therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer: A 2021 update on current development, evidence, and recommendation

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110055
Author(s):  
Clement Chung
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Therapeutic Targets ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Prognostic Biomarkers ◽  
Her2 Gene ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Therapeutic Implications ◽  
Molecular Alterations

Although therapeutically actionable molecular alterations are widely distributed across many cancer types, only a handful of them show evidence of clinical utility and are recommended for routine clinical practice in the management of cancers of colon and rectum (CRC). This 2021 update aims to provide a succinct summary on the use of prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers (expanded RAS, BRAF, microsatellite-high [MSI-H] or deficient mismatch repair [dMMR], neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase [ NTRK] fusion genes, and human epidermal growth factor receptor type II [ HER2] gene amplification) associated with CRC. Therapeutic implications of each relevant predictive or prognostic biomarker for patients with CRC are described, along with discussion on new developments on (1) biomarker-driven therapies such as testing of BRAF, MLH1 promoter methylation and MMR germline genes in differentiating sporadic CRC or hereditary conditions such as Lynch syndrome; (2) first-line use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic CRC; (3) risk stratification and therapy selection based on primary tumor location (left-sided vs. right-sided colon cancer); (3) atypical BRAF mutations; (4) use of EGFR directed therapy in the perioperative oligometastatic disease setting; (5) re-challenge of EGFR directed therapy and (6) personalizing therapy of fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan based on new evidence in pharmacogenomic testing. Data are collected and analyzed from available systematic reviews and meta-analyses of treatments with known therapeutic targets in CRC, which may be associated with predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers. Discussions are presented in an application-based format, with goal to empower pharmacists or other clinicians to gain awareness and understanding in biomarker-driven cancer therapy issues.

scholarly journals Evidence-Based Second-Line Treatment in RAS Wild-Type/Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Precision Medicine Era

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 7717
Author(s):  
Guido Giordano ◽  
Pietro Parcesepe ◽  
Giuseppina Bruno ◽  
Annamaria Piscazzi ◽  
Vincenzo Lizzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
First Line ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
First Line Treatment

Target-oriented agents improve metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) survival in combination with chemotherapy. However, the majority of patients experience disease progression after first-line treatment and are eligible for second-line approaches. In such a context, antiangiogenic and anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) agents as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved as second-line options, and RAS and BRAF mutations and microsatellite status represent the molecular drivers that guide therapeutic choices. Patients harboring K- and N-RAS mutations are not eligible for anti-EGFR treatments, and bevacizumab is the only antiangiogenic agent that improves survival in combination with chemotherapy in first-line, regardless of RAS mutational status. Thus, the choice of an appropriate therapy after the progression to a bevacizumab or an EGFR-based first-line treatment should be evaluated according to the patient and disease characteristics and treatment aims. The continuation of bevacizumab beyond progression or its substitution with another anti-angiogenic agents has been shown to increase survival, whereas anti-EGFR monoclonals represent an option in RAS wild-type patients. In addition, specific molecular subgroups, such as BRAF-mutated and Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) mCRCs represent aggressive malignancies that are poorly responsive to standard therapies and deserve targeted approaches. This review provides a critical overview about the state of the art in mCRC second-line treatment and discusses sequential strategies according to key molecular biomarkers.

scholarly journals Atypical, Non-V600 BRAF Mutations as a Potential Mechanism of Resistance to EGFR Inhibition in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benny Johnson ◽  
Jonathan M. Loree ◽  
Alexandre A. Jacome ◽  
Shehara Mendis ◽  
Muddassir Syed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Egfr Inhibition ◽  
Mechanism Of Resistance

PURPOSE Atypical, non-V600 BRAF ( aBRAF) mutations represent a rare molecular subtype of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Preclinical data are used to categorize aBRAF mutations into class II (intermediate to high levels of kinase activity, RAS independent) and III (low kinase activity level, RAS dependent). The clinical impact of these mutations on anti-EGFR treatment efficacy is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from 2,084 patients with mCRC at a single institution and from an external cohort of 5,257 circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) samples were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS BRAF mutations were harbored by 257 patients, including 36 with aBRAF mutations: 22 class III, 10 class II, four unclassified. For patients with aBRAF mCRC, median OS was 36.1 months, without a difference between classes, and median OS was 21.0 months for patients with BRAFV600E mCRC. In contrast to right-sided predominance of tumors with BRAFV600E mutation, 53% of patients with aBRAF mCRC had left-sided primary tumors. Concurrent RAS mutations were noted in 33% of patients with aBRAF mCRC, and 67% of patients had microsatellite stable disease. Among patients with aBRAF RAS wild-type mCRC who received anti-EGFR antibodies (monotherapy, n = 1; combination therapy, n = 10), no responses to anti-EGFR therapy were reported, and six patients (four with class III aBRAF mutations, one with class II, and one unclassified) achieved stable disease as best response. Median time receiving therapy was 4 months (range, 1 to 16). In the ctDNA cohort, there was an increased prevalence of aBRAF mutations and subclonal aBRAF mutations ( P < .001 for both) among predicted anti-EGFR exposed compared with nonexposed patients. CONCLUSION Efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy is limited in class II and III aBRAF mCRC. Detection of aBRAF mutations in ctDNA after EGFR inhibition may represent a novel mechanism of resistance.

B7-H3 AND PD-L1 EXPRESSION ARE PROGNOSTIC BIOMARKERS IN A MULTI-RACIAL COHORT OF PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL CANCER

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Ana Acuna-Villaorduna ◽  
Kevin Kuan ◽  
Sorab Gupta ◽  
Shaomin Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Biomarkers
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document