Detection of S-phase cells in tissue sections by in situ DNA replication

2000 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony D. Mills ◽  
Nicholas Coleman ◽  
Lesley S. Morris ◽  
Ronald A. Laskey
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Tissue Sections

scholarly journals Cohesin can remain associated with chromosomes during DNA replication

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D. P. Rhodes ◽  
Judith H. I. Haarhuis ◽  
Jonathan B. Grimm ◽  
Benjamin D. Rowland ◽  
Luke D. Lavis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Fluorescent Dye ◽  
Fluorescent Labelling ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
In Cells

SummaryTo ensure disjunction to opposite poles during anaphase, sister chromatids must be held together following DNA replication. This is mediated by cohesin, which is thought to entrap sister DNAs inside a tripartite ring composed of its Smc and kleisin (Scc1) subunits. How such structures are created during S phase is poorly understood, in particular whether they are derived from complexes that had entrapped DNAs prior to replication. To address this, we used selective photobleaching to determine whether cohesin associated with chromatin in G1 persists in situ after replication. We used unlabelled HaloTag ligand following fluorescent labelling to block newly synthesised Halo-tagged Scc1 protein from incorporating fluorescent dye (pulse-chase or pcFRAP). In cells whose cohesin turnover is inactivated by deletion of WAPL, Scc1 remains associated with chromatin throughout S phase. These findings suggest that cohesion might be generated by cohesin that is already bound to unreplicated DNA.

scholarly journals Telomerase RNA localized in the replication band and spherical subnuclear organelles in hypotrichous ciliates.

1995 ◽  
Vol 130 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Fang ◽  
T R Cech
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Fluorescent Antibody ◽  
Dna Binding Protein ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Telomerase Rna ◽  
Replication Machinery ◽  
Antibody Staining ◽  
Telomere Protein ◽  
Replication Band

The intranuclear distribution of telomere DNA-binding protein and telomerase RNA in hypotrichous ciliates was revealed by indirect fluorescent antibody staining and in situ hybridization. The Oxytricha telomere protein colocalized with DNA, both being dispersed throughout the macronucleus except for numerous spherical foci that contained neither DNA nor the protein. Surprisingly, the telomerase RNA was concentrated in these foci; therefore, much of telomerase does not colocalize with telomeres. These foci persist through the cell cycle. They may represent sites of assembly, transport or stockpiling of telomerase and other ribonucleoproteins. During S phase, the macronuclear DNA replication machinery is organized into a disc-shaped structure called the replication band. Telomerase RNA is enriched in the replication band as judged by fluorescence intensity. We conclude that the localization of a subfraction of telomerase is coordinated with semiconservative DNA replication.

Flat embeddment of monolayer cells, tissue sections, and other cellular materials attached onto glass substrate

1990 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 766-767
Author(s):  
Jeffrey P. Chang ◽  
Jaang J. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Present Report ◽  
Cellular Materials ◽  
Cover Glass ◽  
Tissue Sections ◽  
Embedding Technique ◽  
Exfoliated Cells ◽  
Black Paper ◽  
Cell Concentrations ◽  
Flat Embedding

Flat embeddment of certain specimens for electron microscopy is necessary for three classes of biological materials: namely monolayer cells, tissue sections of paraffin or plastics, as well as cell concentrations, exfoliated cells, and cell smears. The present report concerns a flat-embedding technique which can be applied to all these three classes of materials and which is a modified and improved version of Chang's original methodology.Preparation of coverglasses and microslides. Chemically cleaned coverglasses, 11 × 22 mm or other sizes, are laid in rows on black paper. Ink-mark one coner for identifying the spray-side of the glass for growing cells. Lightly spray with Teflon monomer (Heddy/Contact Inductries, Paterson, NO 07524, U.S.A.) from a pressurized can. Bake the sprayed glasses at 500°F for 45 min on Cover-Glass Ceramic Racks (A. Thomas Co. Philadelphia), for Teflon to polymerize.Monolayer Cells. After sterilization, the Teflon-treated coverglasses, with cells attached, are treated or fixed in situ in Columbia staining dishes (A. Thomas Co., Philadelphia) for subsequent processing.

scholarly journals Transcription-coupled structural dynamics of topologically associating domains regulate replication origin efficiency

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongzheng Li ◽  
Boxin Xue ◽  
Mengling Zhang ◽  
Liwei Zhang ◽  
Yingping Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Structural Dynamics ◽  
Replication Origin ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Chromatin Domain ◽  
Replication Origins ◽  
Replication Efficiency ◽  
Topologically Associating Domains ◽  
Epigenetic Signatures

Abstract Background Metazoan cells only utilize a small subset of the potential DNA replication origins to duplicate the whole genome in each cell cycle. Origin choice is linked to cell growth, differentiation, and replication stress. Although various genetic and epigenetic signatures have been linked to the replication efficiency of origins, there is no consensus on how the selection of origins is determined. Results We apply dual-color stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) super-resolution imaging to map the spatial distribution of origins within individual topologically associating domains (TADs). We find that multiple replication origins initiate separately at the spatial boundary of a TAD at the beginning of the S phase. Intriguingly, while both high-efficiency and low-efficiency origins are distributed homogeneously in the TAD during the G1 phase, high-efficiency origins relocate to the TAD periphery before the S phase. Origin relocalization is dependent on both transcription and CTCF-mediated chromatin structure. Further, we observe that the replication machinery protein PCNA forms immobile clusters around TADs at the G1/S transition, explaining why origins at the TAD periphery are preferentially fired. Conclusion Our work reveals a new origin selection mechanism that the replication efficiency of origins is determined by their physical distribution in the chromatin domain, which undergoes a transcription-dependent structural re-organization process. Our model explains the complex links between replication origin efficiency and many genetic and epigenetic signatures that mark active transcription. The coordination between DNA replication, transcription, and chromatin organization inside individual TADs also provides new insights into the biological functions of sub-domain chromatin structural dynamics.

scholarly journals Regulation of DNA Replication Licensing and Re-Replication by Cdt1

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 5195
Author(s):  
Hui Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
E3 Ligase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
Repair Synthesis ◽  
Ubiquitin E3 Ligase

In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication licensing is precisely regulated to ensure that the initiation of genomic DNA replication in S phase occurs once and only once for each mitotic cell division. A key regulatory mechanism by which DNA re-replication is suppressed is the S phase-dependent proteolysis of Cdt1, an essential replication protein for licensing DNA replication origins by loading the Mcm2-7 replication helicase for DNA duplication in S phase. Cdt1 degradation is mediated by CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase, which further requires Cdt1 binding to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) through a PIP box domain in Cdt1 during DNA synthesis. Recent studies found that Cdt2, the specific subunit of CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase that targets Cdt1 for degradation, also contains an evolutionarily conserved PIP box-like domain that mediates the interaction with PCNA. These findings suggest that the initiation and elongation of DNA replication or DNA damage-induced repair synthesis provide a novel mechanism by which Cdt1 and CRL4Cdt2 are both recruited onto the trimeric PCNA clamp encircling the replicating DNA strands to promote the interaction between Cdt1 and CRL4Cdt2. The proximity of PCNA-bound Cdt1 to CRL4Cdt2 facilitates the destruction of Cdt1 in response to DNA damage or after DNA replication initiation to prevent DNA re-replication in the cell cycle. CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase may also regulate the degradation of other PIP box-containing proteins, such as CDK inhibitor p21 and histone methylase Set8, to regulate DNA replication licensing, cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and genome stability by directly interacting with PCNA during DNA replication and repair synthesis.

scholarly journals Developmental differences in genome replication program and origin activation

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (22) ◽  
pp. 12751-12777
Author(s):  
Cathia Rausch ◽  
Patrick Weber ◽  
Paulina Prorok ◽  
David Hörl ◽  
Andreas Maiser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Developmental Differences ◽  
Centromeric Heterochromatin ◽  
Genome Replication ◽  
Origin Activation ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Mes Cells

Abstract To ensure error-free duplication of all (epi)genetic information once per cell cycle, DNA replication follows a cell type and developmental stage specific spatio-temporal program. Here, we analyze the spatio-temporal DNA replication progression in (un)differentiated mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells. Whereas telomeres replicate throughout S-phase, we observe mid S-phase replication of (peri)centromeric heterochromatin in mES cells, which switches to late S-phase replication upon differentiation. This replication timing reversal correlates with and depends on an increase in condensation and a decrease in acetylation of chromatin. We further find synchronous duplication of the Y chromosome, marking the end of S-phase, irrespectively of the pluripotency state. Using a combination of single-molecule and super-resolution microscopy, we measure molecular properties of the mES cell replicon, the number of replication foci active in parallel and their spatial clustering. We conclude that each replication nanofocus in mES cells corresponds to an individual replicon, with up to one quarter representing unidirectional forks. Furthermore, with molecular combing and genome-wide origin mapping analyses, we find that mES cells activate twice as many origins spaced at half the distance than somatic cells. Altogether, our results highlight fundamental developmental differences on progression of genome replication and origin activation in pluripotent cells.

scholarly journals The yeast S phase checkpoint enables replicating chromosomes to bi-orient and restrain spindle extension during S phase distress

2005 ◽  
Vol 168 (7) ◽  
pp. 999-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Bachant ◽  
Shannon R. Jessen ◽  
Sarah E. Kavanaugh ◽  
Candida S. Fielding
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Origin Of Replication ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Hydroxyurea Treatment ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

The budding yeast S phase checkpoint responds to hydroxyurea-induced nucleotide depletion by preventing replication fork collapse and the segregation of unreplicated chromosomes. Although the block to chromosome segregation has been thought to occur by inhibiting anaphase, we show checkpoint-defective rad53 mutants undergo cycles of spindle extension and collapse after hydroxyurea treatment that are distinct from anaphase cells. Furthermore, chromatid cohesion, whose dissolution triggers anaphase, is dispensable for S phase checkpoint arrest. Kinetochore–spindle attachments are required to prevent spindle extension during replication blocks, and chromosomes with two centromeres or an origin of replication juxtaposed to a centromere rescue the rad53 checkpoint defect. These observations suggest that checkpoint signaling is required to generate an inward force involved in maintaining preanaphase spindle integrity during DNA replication distress. We propose that by promoting replication fork integrity under these conditions Rad53 ensures centromere duplication. Replicating chromosomes can then bi-orient in a cohesin-independent manner to restrain untimely spindle extension.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document