Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Normal Delivery vs Caesarean Section Questionnaire

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maedeh Majlesi ◽  
Ali Montazeri ◽  
Fatemeh Rakhshani ◽  
Elmira Nouri-Khashe-Heiran ◽  
Nahid Akbari
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-18
Author(s):  
Yogendra Amatya ◽  
Samita Acharya

Introductions: Caesarean section is rising. The best method of delivery, vaginal or caesarean, for postpartum quality of life in women is a matter of controversy both from professionals’ perspectives and from women’s experience of childbirth. This study analyses quality of life after these two methods of deliveries.Methods: This was a cross-sectional comparative study in postnatal care outpatient department at Patan Hospital. Primipara women with normal delivery and elective caesarean section done in Patan Hospital were enrolled to analyse postpartum quality of life. The SF-12 questionnaire tool at 6 weeks post delivery was used to compare age, ethnicity, education, family type and employment. Data was analysed using ANOVA test for descriptive parameters.Results: There were 468 primipara, age 30-45 years, 94% in 15-30 years77.8% educated, 74.4% in joint family,73.5% housewife. Normal vaginal delivery was 360 (72.6%) and 128 (27.4%) elective caesarean. Vaginal delivery group had average SF score of Physical Health Composite Score of 68.7, Mental Health CompositeScore69.5 and total SF score 67.7. While in caesarean group, it was 64.8,64.1 and 63.4.Conclusions: Normal vaginal delivery had better quality of life resulting in both superior physical as well as mental health.Journal of Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2015. page:13-18


Author(s):  
Merin Baby ◽  
Sruthi M. V.

Background: Caesarean section is a surgical procedure done when vaginal delivery is contraindicated. The prevalence of caesarean section in Kerala showing an increasing trend. Even though the caesarean section is an emergency lifesaving procedure, various other factors like socio-demographic determinants, economic factors and patient’s or clinician’s preferences also influence this increasing trend. The present study was undertaken to compare the various determinants of caesarean section with normal delivery from a tertiary care hospital in Thrissur district.Methods: A hospital-based case control study was done taking mothers who had undergone caesarean section as cases and mothers who had undergone normal delivery as controls during two-month period. The sample size was calculated using the formulae: (Zα + Zβ)2x2xPQ/d2, and the calculated sample size was 88. The various determinants used were socio-demographic, obstetrics and cultural determinants.Results: In this study, it was found that the most common indications for C-section were previous C-section, PPROM and foetal distress. There was a statistically significant association between obstetrics determinants like complications during pregnancy, number of USG taken, period of gestation with mode of delivery. The present study also shows that mothers with educational status up to graduate/PG have lesser incidence of caesarean section. There was a statistically significant association between delivery date close to holidays/festival days and C-section.Conclusions: It is necessary to have health awareness sessions to pregnant mothers about the complication of pregnancy, benefits of normal delivery and complications of C-sections in-order to reduce the patients’ preference for C-section.


Author(s):  
arpita singh ◽  
Snehashish Ghosh ◽  
Anjani Yadav ◽  
Anuja Panthee

Congenital Granular Cell Tumour (CGCT) is a rare benign lesion and presents in newborn as fibrous mass arising from the alveolus.The prenatal screening of lesion can help in parent counselling, determining the complications, as larger size lesion may interfere with normal delivery and require caesarean section.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-71
Author(s):  
Tahamina Akhter ◽  
Tabassum Ghani ◽  
Subinoy Krishna Paul ◽  
Noorjahan ◽  
Afrina Begum ◽  
...  

Introduction : when a healthy pregnant woman with no obstetric or medical risk factors goes into spontaneous labour, she should anticipate a normal delivery. But still 580, 000 women in the world die from pregnancy and childbirth each year.1 Lack of attention to postpartum care in developing countries is neglected tragedy and requires immediate attention. This study evaluates the incidence of complications of early puerperium and also focuses the specific types of complications and to detect the risk factors associated with these complications. Aims and objectives : Main aim of the study is to evaluate the common complications in early puerperium with special attention to identify the risk factors. Materials and method : This study was carried out in Dhaka Medical College Hospital and Sir Sallimullah Medical College Hospital within the period of March ’2004 to August’ 2004. Two hundred patients were selected for this study who were delivered by caesarean section in these two institutions and complications occurring within 7 days excluding first 24 hours. Patients delivered outside the hospital and with known medical diseases were excluded from this study. Detailed history taking and appropriate clinical examination and specific investigations were done for diagnosis of complications. All relevant informations was noted in prescribed data sheet and results were tabulated and statistical analysis was done. Results : Among 200 cases only 44(22%) cases had early puerperal morbidity.Most of the patients who suffered complications underwent caesarean section for obstructed labour and fetal distress who had trial at home. Many of the patients suffered from wound infection and endometritis (40.9%). Among patients, age group -<20 years suffered from wound infection(53.8%) and endometritis(45.8%) were common in age group 21-30 years. VVF was common in patients in age <20 years.Endometritis (42.2%) was maximum in women with parity 1-3 and wound infection (50%) in women with parity 4-6. Some of the patients had more than one early puerperal morbidity. Maximum number of poor class suffered from wound infection (42.4%).Early puerperal morbidity was more prevalent in women with duration of labour <18 hours and Premature rupture of membrane had relationship with endometritis (15.9%), wound infection (13.6%) and UTI (11.4%). Conclusion : Incidence of early puerperal morbidities is still quite high (22%) and many patients experiences more than one problem at a time.Long term sequelae of early puerperal infectious morbidity should not be neglected as this may interfere quality of life of a woman. J Dhaka Medical College, Vol. 27, No.1, April, 2018, Page 68-71


Author(s):  
Shikha Madan ◽  
Neetu Sangwan ◽  
Smiti Nanda ◽  
Daya Sirohiwal ◽  
Pushpa Dahiya ◽  
...  

Background: PPH (postpartum hemorrhage) is the leading cause of maternal mortality. Despite of all the medical advancement, maternal mortality rates have declined greatly in the developed world, PPH remains a leading cause of maternal mortality elsewhere. Caesarean section is an obstetric intervention where, normal delivery can pose a risk for mother or foetus. The rate of caesarean section has increased worldwide. A survey conducted by WHO found that the worldwide rate of caesarean section increased from 26.4% between 2004 to 2008, to 31.2% between 2010 to 2011.Methods: We collected data of the caesarean sections and patients who developed PPH over 6 years. We studied the association of temporal increase of caesarean section with PPH.Results: Uterine atonicity continues to be the most common etiology of PPH each year, however, there is an increase in tissue abnormality (retained placenta, placenta praevia, accreta, increta, percreta) over years as there is a significant increase in the incidence of caesarean section. Atonic uterus was the most common cause for obstetric hysterectomies and mortality due to PPH every year.Conclusions: Family planning advise is essential in developing country like ours to counsel patients to prevent multiparity, thus reducing PPH. It is also important to train all the health workers in periphery and referral centers to manage the third stage of labor and atonic uterus to save the mothers. Sagacious attitude towards the decision of caesarean section is needed to prevent maternal morbidity and mortality.


This task assesses the following clinical skills: … ● Patient safety ● Communication with patients and their relatives ● Information gathering ● Applied clinical knowledge … Sarah Bener is a 28- year- old lady in her second pregnancy. She has had an elective caesarean section in her last pregnancy for a breech delivery two years ago. She has no other health problems and her pregnancy has progressed well so far. She is currently 36 weeks pregnant and has presented to the antenatal clinic to discuss the mode of delivery. You have 10 minutes for this task (+ 2mins initial reading time) Please read instructions to candidate and actor. This station assesses the candidate’s ability to come to a shared decision after discussing the pros and cons of both the options. Please do not interrupt or prompt. Record your overall clinical impression of the candidate for each domain (e.g. should this performance be pass, borderline or a fail). You are Sarah Bener, a 28- year- old house wife. You are 36 weeks pregnant. You are healthy and so far your pregnancy had progressed smoothly. You feel good baby movements. The screening test as well as the baby’s scan at 20 weeks has been normal. You have one child, Imogen, born by caesarean section two years ago. It was an elective caesarean section as Imogen was in breech position. They did try turning her (ECV), but was unsuccessful. You were very much looking forward to a normal delivery and were disappointed that you needed a caesarean section. The caesarean section was straightforward, without any complications. But you needed a few days to recover at home. You are keen to have a normal delivery this time, but want to know the options and risks of the mode of delivery. Both you and your husband have always wanted a large family, so want to know the implications of a second section. If the candidate does not mention VBAC, say that you have heard of this and can they explain more about it.


Author(s):  
Jayashree Purkayastha

Breastfeeding is a complete nutrition for the baby and beneficial to the baby and the mother. Mothers should be prepared for breastfeeding and motivated antenatally. Breastfeeding should be initiated within 1 h of normal delivery and 4 h of Caesarean section. In the first 2 days, colostrum is secreted which is highly immunogenic to the baby. Mature milk comes by day 10 of life. Foremilk is rich in protein and vitamins, while hindmilk is rich in fat. Proper technique should be followed for successful breastfeeding. Reflexes in the mother while breastfeeding are prolactin and oxytocin reflexes, while reflexes in the baby are rooting, sucking and swallowing. In case of early discharge from the hospital, adequacy of breastfeeding should be checked at 3–5 days of life. Breastfeeding develops bonding between the baby and the mother and promotes brain growth of the baby. Human milk is suitable for the baby and contains less protein and minerals than cow’s milk and has less solute load for immature kidneys of the baby. Breastfeeding should be on demand, minimum eight times per day. The common feeding problems in the mother are flat or inverted nipple, sore nipple, engorgement of breasts, and mastitis which should be prevented.


2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Manohar ◽  
Christopher F.G. Woods ◽  
Stephen W. Lindow

AbstractDifferences exist in obstetric intervention rates between hospitals but it is not known if the individual consultant governs the decision to intervene or whether intervention is a product of agreed protocols and working practices. The purpose of this study is to analyse the differences in obstetric intervention rates amongst individual consultants working in a large maternity unit.Each consultant was responsible for all deliveries occurring in successive 24-h periods. Over a 6-year period all deliveries resulting from a spontaneous onset of labour were matched to the consultant in charge at the time of the delivery and analysed.There were no differences seen in normal delivery rates (χWithin the hospital, individual consultants demonstrated no significant variations in overall intervention rates. However, when intervention occurred, different consultants showed preferences for forceps and caesarean section.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document