Transitive Reasoning Test

People high in autistic-like traits have been found to have difficulties with recognizing emotions from nonverbal expressions. However, findings on the autism—emotion recognition relationship are inconsistent. In the present study, we investigated whether speeded reasoning ability (reasoning performance under time pressure) moderates the inverse relationship between autistic-like traits and emotion recognition performance. We expected the negative correlation between autistic-like traits and emotion recognition to be less strong when speeded reasoning ability was high. MTurkers (N = 217) completed the ten item version of the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ-10), two emotion recognition tests using videos with sound (Geneva Emotion Recognition Test, GERT-S) and pictures (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, RMET), and Baddeley's Grammatical Reasoning test to measure speeded reasoning. As expected, the higher the ability in speeded reasoning, the less were higher autistic-like traits related to lower emotion recognition performance. These results suggest that a high ability in making quick mental inferences may (partly) compensate for difficulties with intuitive emotion recognition related to autistic-like traits.

Download Full-text

Validity Evidence and Measurement Equivalence for the Dutch Translation of the Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression

Applied Psychology ◽

10.1111/apps.12309 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

James M. LeBreton ◽

Sydney L. Reichin ◽

Jan te Nijenhuis ◽

Myckel Cremers ◽

Kitty Heijden‐Lek

Keyword(s):

Measurement Equivalence ◽

Conditional Reasoning ◽

Validity Evidence ◽

Dutch Translation ◽

Reasoning Test

Download Full-text

Acceptable Levels of Tonal and Broad-Band Repetitive and Continuous Sounds during the Performance of Nonauditory Tasks

Perceptual and Motor Skills ◽

10.2466/pms.1995.81.3.803 ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 81 (3) ◽

pp. 803-816 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Ulf Landström ◽

Anders Kjellberg ◽

Marianne Byström

Keyword(s):

Reaction Time ◽

Sound Pressure ◽

Broad Band ◽

Reaction Time Task ◽

Simple Reaction Time Task ◽

Reasoning Test ◽

Band Noise ◽

Time Test ◽

The Difference ◽

Reaction Time Test

Three groups of 24 subjects were exposed to a 1000–Hz tone or broad band noise in a sound chamber. During the exposures subjects were engaged in an easy reaction time test or a difficult grammatical reasoning test. For each exposure and work subjects adjusted the noise to a tolerance level defined by its interference with task performance. During the simple reaction-time task significantly higher sound-pressure levels were accepted than during the reasoning test. At the tonal exposure, much lower levels were accepted than during the exposure to broad-band noise. For continuous sound exposures much higher levels were accepted than for noncontinuous exposures. For tonal exposures the difference was approximately 5 dB, for the broad-band exposures approximately 9 dB. In a separate study the effects of the noncontinuity of the noise and pauses were analysed. The raised annoying effect of the noncontinuous noise was not more affected by the noncontinuity of the noise periods than by the noncontinuity of the pauses. The results imply that the annoying reactions to the sound will be increased for repetitive noise and that the reaction is highly influenced by the over-all noncontinuity of the exposure.

Download Full-text

The Eyes Chico, They Never Lie – Using Eye-Tracking to Examine Faking on the Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression

Journal of Personnel Psychology ◽

10.1027/1866-5888/a000276 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 20 (2) ◽

pp. 84-96

Author(s):

Mitja Ružojčić ◽

Zvonimir Galić ◽

Antun Palanović ◽

Maja Parmač Kovačić ◽

Andreja Bubić

Keyword(s):

Eye Movements ◽

Eye Tracking ◽

Personnel Selection ◽

Test Scores ◽

Conditional Reasoning ◽

Reasoning Test ◽

Test Study ◽

True Purpose ◽

Response Alternatives

Abstract. To better understand the process of responding to the Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression (CRT-A) and its implication for the test's use in personnel selection, we conducted two lab studies in which we compared test scores and eye movements of participants responding honestly and faking the test. Study 1 results showed that, although participants might try to respond differently to the CRT-A while faking, it remains an indirect and unfakeable measure as long as the test's purpose is undisclosed. Study 2 showed that revealing the true purpose of the CRT-A diminishes the test's indirect nature so the test becomes fakeable, solving it requires less attention and participants direct their eyes more to response alternatives congruent with the presentational demands.

Download Full-text