scholarly journals The development and validation of the Memory Support Rating Scale.

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 715-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Y. Lee ◽  
Frank C. Worrell ◽  
Allison G. Harvey
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Memory Support ◽  
Development And Validation

Revisiting rating scale development for rater-mediated language performance assessments: Modelling construct and contextual choices made by scale developers

2021 ◽  
pp. 026553222199405
Author(s):  
Ute Knoch ◽  
Bart Deygers ◽  
Apichat Khamboonruang
Keyword(s):  
Scale Development ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Language Assessment ◽  
Performance Assessments ◽  
Language Performance ◽  
Scale Development And Validation ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Development And Validation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Different Sources

Rating scale development in the field of language assessment is often considered in dichotomous ways: It is assumed to be guided either by expert intuition or by drawing on performance data. Even though quite a few authors have argued that rating scale development is rarely so easily classifiable, this dyadic view has dominated language testing research for over a decade. In this paper we refine the dominant model of rating scale development by drawing on a corpus of 36 studies identified in a systematic review. We present a model showing the different sources of scale construct in the corpus. In the discussion, we argue that rating scale designers, just like test developers more broadly, need to start by determining the purpose of the test, the relevant policies that guide test development and score use, and the intended score use when considering the design choices available to them. These include considering the impact of such sources on the generalizability of the scores, the precision of the post-test predictions that can be made about test takers’ future performances and scoring reliability. The most important contributions of the model are that it gives rating scale developers a framework to consider prior to starting scale development and validation activities.

Development and validation of a self-rating scale for positive- and negative-reinforcement smoking: The Michigan Nicotine Reinforcement Questionnaire

2003 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 711-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ovide Pomerleau ◽  
James Tate ◽  
Cynthia Pomerleau ◽  
Karl-Olov Fagerström ◽  
Judith Marks
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Negative Reinforcement ◽  
Self Rating ◽  
Development And Validation

Insight into conflictual relationship patterns: Development and validation of an observer rating scale

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 934-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Jennissen ◽  
Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons ◽  
Paul Crits-Christoph ◽  
Julia Huber ◽  
Christoph Nikendei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Relationship Patterns ◽  
Observer Rating ◽  
Development And Validation ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Conflictual Relationship

Erratum

2009 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-383
Keyword(s):  
Music Education ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Performance Rating ◽  
Reference List ◽  
Development And Validation

In the Napoles (2009) article, the name Zdzinski was spelled incorrectly in the text and reference list. The correct reference is as follows: Zdzinski, S. F., & Barnes, G. V. (2002). Development and validation of a string performance rating scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 245–255

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document