Supplemental Material for Recovery Assessment Scale: Testing Validity With Portuguese Community-Based Mental Health Organization Users

2015 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Mental Health Organization ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Recovery Assessment ◽  
Recovery Assessment Scale

Recovery assessment scale: Examining the factor structure of the German version (RAS-G) in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cavelti ◽  
M. Wirtz ◽  
P. Corrigan ◽  
R. Vauth
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Psychotic Symptoms ◽  
Community Mental Health Service ◽  
German Version ◽  
Study Results ◽  
German Speaking ◽  
Recovery Assessment ◽  
Recovery Assessment Scale

AbstractBackgroundThe recovery framework has found its way into local and national mental health services and policies around the world, especially in English speaking countries. To promote this process, it is necessary to assess personal recovery validly and reliably. The Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) is the most established measure in recovery research. The aim of the current study is to examine the factor structure of the German version of the RAS (RAS-G).MethodsOne hundred and fifty-six German-speaking clients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder from a community mental health service completed the RAS-G plus measures of recovery attitudes, self-stigma, psychotic symptoms, depression, and functioning. A confirmatory factor analysis of the original 24-item RAS version was conducted to examine its factor structure, followed by reliability and validity testing of the extracted factors.ResultsThe CFA yielded five factors capturing 14 items which showed a substantial overlap with the original subscales Personal Confidence and Hope, Goal and Success Orientation, Willingness to Ask for Help, Reliance on Others, and No Domination by Symptoms. The factors demonstrated mean to excellent reliability (0.59–0.89) and satisfactory criterial validity by positive correlations with measures of recovery attitudes and functioning, and negative correlations with measures of self-stigma, and psychotic and depressive symptoms.ConclusionsThe study results are discussed in the light of other studies examining the factor structure of the RAS. Overall, they support the use of the RAS-G as a means to promote recovery oriented services, policies, and research in German-speaking countries.

scholarly journals Testing the Validity of the Recovery Assessment Scale Using an Australian Sample

2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 450-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandy McNaught ◽  
Peter Caputi ◽  
Lindsay G. Oades ◽  
Frank P. Deane
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Health Measures ◽  
Recovery Assessment ◽  
Recovery Assessment Scale

Objective: Mental health services in Australia are increasingly becoming recovery orientated. However, there are varying meanings for recovery and few measures that specifically target recovery outcomes. The current study aimed to assess the construct and concurrent validity of a patient self-report measure, the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS). Method: Participants were 168 individuals with severe and persistent psychiatric disability who were participants in the Australian Integrated Mental Health Initiative (AIMhi) project. They completed self-report recovery and other mental health measures and their case workers completed the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to examine the factor structure of the RAS. Results: Exploratory factor analysis of the RAS produced five factors that were replicated using confirmatory techniques. Each factor has satisfactory internal reliability (Cronbach α range = 0.73–0.91). The factors displayed convergent validity with positive and significant correlations with other recovery measures. Concurrent validity was demonstrated with significant but lower correlations with symptoms and clinician-rated measures of psychiatric functioning. Conclusion: The factors of the RAS are consistent with the consumer literature on recovery. Correlations with other variable suggest that the RAS is measuring something different from traditional symptom or functional mental health measures. Further research is needed to clarify the extent to which the RAS is able to capture the range of recovery experiences that have been described by patients.

Coping with the terminal illness of a colleague in a mental health organization.

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-234
Author(s):  
Beatriz Gómez ◽  
Edith Vega ◽  
Diana Kirszman ◽  
Héctor Fernández-Alvarez
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Terminal Illness ◽  
Mental Health Organization ◽  
Health Organization

scholarly journals Longitudinal changes in personal recovery in individuals with psychotic disorders through hospitalisation in a psychiatric ward: preliminary findings

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Norika Mitsunaga-Ohmuro ◽  
Noriyuki Ohmuro
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Negative Symptoms ◽  
Psychotic Disorders ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Psychiatric Ward ◽  
Personal Recovery ◽  
Recovery Assessment ◽  
General Self Efficacy ◽  
Recovery Assessment Scale

Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate whether personal recovery indices in individuals with psychotic disorders would change through hospitalisation in a psychiatric ward and to identify factors associated with these changes. Methods Participants underwent assessments for personal recovery using the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery, Recovery Assessment Scale, and Self-Identified Stage of Recovery Part A and B; clinical symptoms using the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale; self-efficacy using the General Self-Efficacy Scale; and self-esteem using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale at baseline and before hospital discharge. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were administered for longitudinal comparisons between baseline and follow-up. Spearman’s rank correlation tests were conducted to assess correlations of longitudinal changes in personal recovery with baseline values of personal recovery as well as baseline values or changes in the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Results Thirty-four individuals with psychotic disorders completed the assessments. The average duration of the current hospitalisation was 81.9 days (SD, 15.3; median, 85.0; range, 51–128 days). No significant changes were observed in personal recovery, self-efficacy, and self-esteem, although clinical symptoms significantly improved. Significant correlations were found between positive changes in the Recovery Assessment Scale and improvements in negative symptoms; between positive changes in the General Self-Efficacy Scale and those in personal recovery assessed with the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery, Recovery Assessment Scale, and Self-Identified Stage of Recovery part A; and between positive changes in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and those in the Self-Identified Stage of Recovery part B. Conclusion This study revealed longitudinal relationships between changes in personal recovery and amelioration of negative symptoms or enhancement of self-efficacy and self-esteem through moderate length of hospitalisation in individuals with psychotic disorders. Considering the small sample size in this study, further studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm the present finding. Trial registration The protocol of this study is registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR; ID: UMIN000035131).

Assessing the Recovery Assessment Scale Across Time

2021 ◽  
pp. appi.ps.2020005
Author(s):  
Sadaaki Fukui ◽  
Michelle P. Salyers
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Recovery Assessment ◽  
Recovery Assessment Scale
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document