scholarly journals International advisees' perspectives on the advising relationship in counseling psychology doctoral programs.

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Knox ◽  
Justin T. Sokol ◽  
Arpana G. Inman ◽  
Lewis Z. Schlosser ◽  
Johanna Nilsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Counseling Psychology ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Advising Relationship ◽  
Psychology Doctoral

Admission Criteria to APA-Accredited Programs in Counseling Psychology Over 10 Years

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlene M. Alexander ◽  
Carolyn J. Heineman ◽  
Melissa Shuman Zarin ◽  
Lisa M. Larson
Keyword(s):  
Counseling Psychology ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Paired Comparison ◽  
Admission Criteria ◽  
Diverse Populations ◽  
Research Publication ◽  
Admissions Criteria ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Psychology Doctoral ◽  
Selection Of

This study was designed to investigate the extent to which the values of counseling psychology are present in the selection of applicants to counseling psychology doctoral programs and to determine the stability of these values over a 10-year period. A forced-choice paired comparison model revealed that preference for admissions criteria was relatively stable over time. Specifically, preference for an ethnic minority applicant was ranked first over a 10-year period followed by the research publication of an applicant and experience in counseling diverse populations. The present findings have implications for addressing the profession's evolving professional identity andfor the advising of doctoral applicants.

scholarly journals Status of Internationalization in U.S. Counseling-Psychology Doctoral Programs

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica J. Hurley ◽  
Lawrence H. Gerstein ◽  
Stefania Aegisdottir
Keyword(s):  
Counseling Psychology ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Psychology Doctoral

The State of Ethical Training for Counseling Psychology Doctoral Students

1993 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 445-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda S. Wilson ◽  
Victor A. Ranft
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Counseling Psychology ◽  
Ethics Education ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Ethics Training ◽  
Psychology Programs ◽  
Psychology Doctoral Students ◽  
Student Input ◽  
Psychology Doctoral

Ethics training in graduate psychology programs has blossomed in the last decade but the debate continues regarding how graduate ethics training should be taught. Although an effective model of ethics training is being discussed among professors, student input has been negligible and information from students in counseling psychology programs nonexistent. The present study surveyed student representatives from APA-accredited doctoral programs in professional psychology for 1990 on their exposure and type of ethics education as well as their perception of preparedness to deal with ethical dilemmas. Results indicate that 94% of the programs require training in ethics and that most students feel prepared for both legal and ethical issues that may arise in their professional roles. Students feel more prepared in the decision-making process than in factual information of ethics; this finding was surprising given that the reported emphasis of their training was much stronger on content than on process.

Prevalence of training in addiction psychology and treatment in APA-accredited clinical and counseling psychology doctoral programs

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 269-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine Corbin ◽  
William H. Gottdiener ◽  
Skultip Sirikantraporn ◽  
Jessica L. Armstrong ◽  
Sean Probber
Keyword(s):  
Counseling Psychology ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Clinical And Counseling Psychology ◽  
Psychology Doctoral

The Importance of Personal Statements in Counselor Education and Psychology Doctoral Program Applications

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Davis ◽  
Jason F. Doll ◽  
William R. Sterner
Keyword(s):  
Counselor Education ◽  
Graduate School ◽  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Counseling Psychology ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Empirical Information ◽  
Psychology Doctoral

Personal statements are an important component of applications for counselor education and psychology doctoral programs. However, a paucity of empirical information exists about what types of content are viewed favorably and how this content influences admissions decisions. In the current study, 97 faculty members from clinical psychology, counseling psychology, and counselor education doctoral programs completed an online survey about how favorably they viewed content included in personal statements. Respondents viewed personal statements as the most important component of an application, and there were no significant differences in favorability ratings of content or stylistic issues across program types. Recommendations for those mentoring students applying to graduate school and faculty reviewing applications were provided.

Questionable Research Practices among Faculty and Students in APA-accredited Clinical and Counseling Psychology Doctoral Programs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Swift ◽  
Cody D Christopherson ◽  
Megan Bird ◽  
Amanda Zold ◽  
Jonathan Goode
Keyword(s):  
Graduate School ◽  
Counseling Psychology ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
American Psychological Association ◽  
Research Practices ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Questionable Research Practices ◽  
Clinical And Counseling Psychology ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Psychology Doctoral

This study examines self-reported engagement in questionable research practices (QRPs) by faculty (N = 164) and students (N = 110) in American Psychological Association (APA)-accredited clinical and counseling psychology doctoral programs. Both faculty and student participants were asked to report their own engagement as well as the engagement of their graduate school mentor in 12 QRPs. Nearly 65% of the faculty participants and 50% of the student participants reported engaging in at least one QRP. The most commonly reported QRP was selectively reporting findings that worked (35% for faculty, 26% for students) and the least commonly admitted was falsifying data (0% for faculty, 1% for students). Total number of QRPs engaged in was significantly predicted by knowledge of mentor engagement in QRPs (explaining 34% of the variance for faculty and 19% of the variance for students), but it was not predicted by degree year, number of publications, or self-reported researcher reputation. These results suggest that QRPs do occur in the field, but perhaps at lower levels than had previously been thought. They also suggest that additional training in QRPs is needed. Training implications and future directions are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document