Olfactory discrimination, reversal learning, and stimulus control in rats.

1975 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry J. Nigrosh ◽  
Burton M. Slotnick ◽  
John A. Nevin
Psychobiology ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence A. Saperstein ◽  
David Kucharski ◽  
Mark E. Stanton ◽  
W. G. Hall

1968 ◽  
Vol 22 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1237-1242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Davidson

4 rats were reinforced with cream and sugar for traversing a 4-ft. runway which allowed right and left approaches to separate goal boxes. After each S had satisfied 3 criteria of stable responses to a goal, the path to that goal was blocked by a door, thus requiring a discrimination reversal. All Ss met the same criteria of stability through 2 to 4 reversals as a decreasing function of number of reinforced trials.


2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Beran ◽  
Emily D. Klein ◽  
Theodore A. Evans ◽  
Betty Chan ◽  
Timothy M. Flemming ◽  
...  

1970 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merrill F. Elias

Spatial discrimination reversal learning was explored for mice genetically selected for high brain weight and unselected controls with lower brain weights. Control-line Ss escaped from a water maze more rapidly, but high-line Ss made fewer errors and took less trials to reach criterion on the first reversal. Control-line Ss were unable to complete more than 1 reversal, while high-line Ss all completed at least 7 reversals. This positive relation between reversal learning and brain size is consistent with comparisons among species and experiments manipulating brain size by means of drugs or surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document