Moral behavior and moral judgment of children.

1952 ◽  
Vol 47 (2, Suppl) ◽  
pp. 463-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Refia Ugurel-Semin
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew E. Monroe ◽  
Garrett L. Brady ◽  
Bertram F. Malle

According to previous research, threatening people’s belief in free will may undermine moral judgments and behavior. Four studies tested this claim. Study 1 used a Velten technique to threaten people’s belief in free will and found no effects on moral behavior, judgments of blame, and punishment decisions. Study 2 used six different threats to free will and failed to find effects on judgments of blame and wrongness. Study 3 found no effects on moral judgment when manipulating general free will beliefs but found strong effects when manipulating the perceived choice capacity of the judged agent. Study 4 used pretested narratives that varied agents’ apparent free will and found that perceived choice capacity mediated the relationship between free will and blame. These results suggest that people’s general beliefs about whether free will exists have no impact on moral judgments but specific judgments about the agent’s choice capacity do.


2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon M. Laham

Two studies demonstrate that the ease with which moral circle exemplars come to mind influences the size of the moral circle and moral behavior. Participants who generated three exemplars had significantly larger circles than those asked to generate 15. Further, those who generated three exemplars were more likely to take a newsletter providing information on how to help circle members. These studies demonstrate the impact of metacognitive experiences on moral judgment and behavior, and highlight the importance of including metacognitive variables in any comprehensive account of moral judgment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Manfrinati

AbstractContrary to Greene's dual-process theory of moral judgment (Greene 2013), this commentary suggests that the network view of the brain proposed by Pessoa, in which emotion and cognition may be used as labels in the context of certain behaviors, but will not map clearly into compartmentalized pieces of the brain, could represent a better explanation of the rationale behind people's moral behavior.


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 525-533
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Wenwen Hou ◽  
Liqi Zhu ◽  
Michael Tomasello

The current study aimed to investigate the cultural differences in the developmental origins of children’s intent-based moral judgment and moral behavior in the context of indirect reciprocity. To this end, we compared how German and Chinese children interpret and react to antisocial and prosocial interactions between puppets. An actor puppet performed either a positive or negative act toward a prosocial or antisocial target puppet with the intention to cause harm or not; 197 three and five-year-old children participated as a third party and were asked to judge the actor puppet’s behavior and to distribute stickers. Results showed that 3-year-old Chinese children were able to take intention and context into account when making moral judgments and distributing resources, whereas German children did not show sensitivity to intention until the age of 5. These findings suggest that culture may mediate children’s intent-based moral judgment and moral behavior in the context of indirect reciprocity.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nedi Hendri ◽  
Suyanto Suyanto

The aim of this study was to determine the various factors that influence ethical behavior accounting profession educators in Lampung Province. Analysis of the data of this study are included in the quantitative research and aimed to test the hypothesis. Structural analysis of studies using Equetion Modeling (SEM) in order to obtain a comprehensive model of research results, both direct effect and indirect effect. The results showed that moral reasoning does not significantly affect the ethical behavior accountant educator. The findings of this study are not consistent with existing theory and do not support someof the results of previous studies which claim that moral reasoning would easily make a moral judgment and moral behavior. The influence of moral reasoning on the ethical behavior of the accounting profession educators tend to be straightforward. The findings of this study are consistent with existing theory and supports some of the results of previous studies which state that will facilitate one's professional experience make moral judgment and moral behavior. Ethical attitude will automatically bring ethical behavior as well. The influence of professional experience to the ethical behavior of the accounting profession educators tend to be direct or through locus of control. Keywords:Moral thinking, professional experience, locus of control and ethical behavior.


Author(s):  
Jesse Graham ◽  
Piercarlo Valdesolo

Since the early 2000s, morality research in personality and social psychology has exploded, with more articles on moral judgment and moral behavior published in the first fifth of the 21st century than the entirety of the 20th century. However, while moral psychology is flourishing in the field, it remains deeply divided in several respects, with largely separate literatures for moral judgment and moral behavior, as well as separations between individual differences and situational effects for each. This chapter follows the two main cleavages in moral psychology, covering cultural and individual differences in moral judgment, situational effects on moral judgment, cultural and individual differences in moral behavior, and situational effects on moral behavior. Further, it highlights evidence of person–situation interactions for both moral judgment and moral behavior, and maps out several future directions for moral psychology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document