Reward magnitude in differential conditioning: Effects of sequential variables in acquisition and extinction.

1974 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 1141-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger L. Mellgren ◽  
Dennis G. Dyck
Keyword(s):  
Reward Magnitude ◽  
Differential Conditioning

Differential conditioning of fear to ingroup and outgroup faces

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah R. Zinner ◽  
Eddie Harmon-Jones ◽  
Patricia G. Devine ◽  
David M. Amodio
Keyword(s):  
Differential Conditioning

scholarly journals The effects of preexperimental diet upon reward magnitude effects

1978 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Prytula ◽  
Stephen F. Davis ◽  
James W. Voorhees
Keyword(s):  
Reward Magnitude

Preference for Predictable Small Rewards over Unpredictable Larger Rewards

1984 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 467-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gene D. Steinhauer
Keyword(s):  
Reward Magnitude ◽  
Partial Reinforcement ◽  
Frustration Theory ◽  
Equal Frequency ◽  
Theory Analysis ◽  
Clear Preference ◽  
Avoidance Tendency ◽  
Discrimination Procedure ◽  
Two Alternatives ◽  
Reinforcement Procedure

Numerous prior studies have reported that rats, pigeons, and humans prefer predictable over unpredictable rewards of equal frequency and magnitude. A frustration-theory analysis of this preference suggests that it obtains because the unpredictable partial reinforcement procedure is aversive whereas the predictable discrimination procedure loses its aversiveness. The preference, on such an analysis, arises due to the tendency to avoid the unpredictable of two alternatives. Since frustration varies as a function of magnitude of reward, the avoidance tendency should increase with increases in reward magnitude in the unpredictable alternative. One group of rats in the present study showed a clear preference for seven versus five 45-mg Noyes Pellets. A second group showed the oft reported preference for five pellets predictable versus five pellets unpredictable. A third group of rats showed a preference for a five-pellet predictable reward over a seven-pellet unpredictable reward. The results of this experiment provide evidence for a frustration-theory analysis of the preference for predictable reward.

Effect of Reinforcement of the Negative Discriminandum in Differential Conditioning

1964 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Donovick ◽  
Leonard E. Ross
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Discrimination Learning ◽  
Differential Conditioning ◽  
Discrimination Problem ◽  
Single Stimulus ◽  
Female Rats ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Learning Situation ◽  
Learning Conditions ◽  
The Difference

The present investigation was concerned with the reduction of inhibition associated with the negative discriminandum in a single stimulus discrimination learning situation. In Phase I 33 female rats were trained on a black-white discrimination problem. In the second phase Ss were divided into three groups which received: (a) 100% reinforcement to both the old positive and negative discriminanda; (b) four trials per day to the old negative, 100% reward; (c) eight trials per day to the old negative, 100% reward. As in previous studies, which employed simultaneous discrimination learning conditions, speed to the old negative remained significantly below speed to the old positive in the second phase. However, unlike the previous results, the difference decreased over trials. No differences were found between the groups that had trials to the old negative cue only, or between these groups and either speed to the old positive or the old negative in the case of the group receiving reward on both cues.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document