Relative aversiveness of signaled vs. unsignaled avoidable and escapable shock situations in humans.

1974 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 338-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Badia ◽  
Stuart A. Culbertson ◽  
John Harsh
Keyword(s):  
1981 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 471-485
Author(s):  
Michael J. Follick

This study examined the effects of the opportunity to aggress during pretraining for learned helplessness. While rats individually given inescapable shock showed deficits in subsequent chain-pull escape, the performance of rats given inescapable shock in pairs did not differ from that of animals exposed to escapable shock or no shock. These results are interpreted as contrary to the prediction of the learned-helplessness hypothesis and are consistent with the notion that shock-induced aggression serves an adaptive function.


1969 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Domjan ◽  
John W. Rowell

8 rats were exposed to a procedure in which several escapable-shock sessions were alternated with inescapable-shock sessions. The conditioned escape behavior was observed to persist as superstitious escape during inescapable shock. The rate and resistance to extinction of the superstitious escape behavior was found to decline with repeated changes from escapable to inescapable shock. Amount of escape conditioning was not observed to affect this discrimination.


1998 ◽  
Vol 783 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharmin Maswood ◽  
Julie E Barter ◽  
Linda R Watkins ◽  
Steven F Maier

1988 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 563-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary E. Brown ◽  
Gary D. Hughes ◽  
Andrew A. Jones

Male cockroaches ( Periplaneta americana) were exposed to either escapable, inescapable, or no shock in an escape task for three consecutive days. 24 hr. later they were placed individually in an aquarium with a naive cockroach and the frequency of aggressive behavior and defensive behavior was recorded by a blind observer. The inescapable shock group of cockroaches displayed less aggressive behavior and a greater tendency to retreat from social encounter than the escapable shock or no shock groups.


Science ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 244 (4901) ◽  
pp. 224-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Shors ◽  
T. Seib ◽  
S Levine ◽  
R. Thompson

Science ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 221 (4610) ◽  
pp. 568-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Laudenslager ◽  
S. Ryan ◽  
R. Drugan ◽  
R. Hyson ◽  
S. Maier

1995 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 1051-1057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary E. Brown ◽  
Angela Moore ◽  
Deidra Tallman

For three consecutive days, four groups of adult cockroaches ( Periplaneta americana) were yoked to cockroaches receiving escapable shock. The four groups of subjects received either inescapable shock followed by exposure to 12 minutes of cold (2° C), inescapable shock followed by no exposure to cold, no-shock followed by exposure to cold, or no-shock followed by no exposure to cold. 24 hr. later all five groups were run on a different escape task. The cockroaches exposed to inescapable shock followed by no exposure to cold showed the usual escape deficit. The cockroaches exposed to inescapable shock followed by exposure to cold did not differ from the escapable shock cockroaches or the controls.


1983 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas B. Moye ◽  
Richard L. Hyson ◽  
James W. Grau ◽  
Steven F. Maier

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document