Response requirements and primacy-recency effects in a simulated selection interview.

1973 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Farr
Author(s):  
Dayna Gomes ◽  
Kulnoor K. Sandhu ◽  
Hongyuan Qi ◽  
Chelsey M. Lee ◽  
Deborah A. Connolly

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Daniel ◽  
Jeffrey S. Katz
Keyword(s):  

1980 ◽  
Vol 47 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1087-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine F. Shepard ◽  
Maureen Hallinan

This study aimed to determine whether similarity of interviewer and interviewee or interviewer and interviewer influenced applicant interview ratings. Data on background characteristics, relative interests and need for social approval were secured from 21 faculty interviewers and 296 applicants during actual selection interviews. Contrary to prior findings based on simulated activity, the results did not uphold the role of similarity. Additional data gathered from follow-up interviews with faculty interviewers point to preconceived conceptions of an “ideal” candidate as a stronger reference point for decision making in selection interviews than similarity to self.


1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond P. Kesner ◽  
Andrea A. Chiba ◽  
Pamela Jackson-smith

1992 ◽  
Vol 11 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clive Fletcher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document