Frustration effect following training with continuous and partial delay of reward.

1971 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-325
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Sgro ◽  
John R. Showalter ◽  
Neil H. Cohn
Keyword(s):  
Frustration Effect ◽  
Partial Delay ◽  
Delay Of Reward

Delay of Reinforcement: Cue Utilization and the Frustration Effect

1966 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-171
Author(s):  
K. Edward Renner
Keyword(s):  
Frustration Effect ◽  
Partial Reinforcement ◽  
Constant Delay ◽  
Cue Utilization ◽  
Differential Learning ◽  
Partial Delay ◽  
Delay Of Reinforcement ◽  
Delay Of Reward

Ss receiving partial delay of reward showed better differential learning with a brightness cue given on the delay trials than did Ss receiving partial reinforcement for which the cue was given on nonreward trials. Partial delay of reinforcement resulted in faster start latencies on the trials in which reinforcement was immediate than occurred for continuous immediate reinforcement. The decremental effects of constant delay of reinforcement on performance were eliminated when a sufficient number of trials were given.

Partial delay of reward in the double alleyway.

1972 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 458-460
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Sgro ◽  
Neil H. Cohn ◽  
Stephen D. Dudley
Keyword(s):  
Partial Delay ◽  
Delay Of Reward

Effect of Interpolated Extinction after Partial Delay of Reward Training on Subsequent Reacquisition and Extinction

1968 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Thomas Surridge ◽  
Karen R. Mock ◽  
Abram Amsel
Keyword(s):  
Straight Runway ◽  
Extinction Training ◽  
The Other ◽  
Albino Rats ◽  
Extinction Period ◽  
Resistance To Extinction ◽  
The Third ◽  
Third Phase ◽  
Partial Delay ◽  
Delay Of Reward

Four groups of albino rats were run four trials a day in a straight runway for 44 days. On the first 15 days, two groups were given continuous immediate reward (IR) and two groups a 50 per cent, schedule of 30-sec. partial delay of reward (PDR). On the next 15 days, one IR group and one PDR group were extinguished, while the other IR and PDR groups remained on their original schedules. In the third phase, all groups received 8 days of training on IR. Finally, all groups were given 6 days of extinction training. In the first extinction, PDR produced greater resistance to extinction than IR. In the second extinction period, the PDR group which had previously been given extinction and the two IR groups extinguished relatively rapidly and at approximately the same rates, while the PDR group which had not been extinguished was significantly more resistant to extinction than the other three groups.

Frustration effect following correlated nonreinforcement.

1968 ◽  
Vol 78 (3, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 396-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank A. Logan
Keyword(s):  
Frustration Effect

Incomplete reduction of reward and the frustration effect with hunger constant.

1969 ◽  
Vol 80 (3, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 493-497
Author(s):  
Lawrence A. Hall ◽  
John N. Marr
Keyword(s):  
Frustration Effect
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document