Further comments on "Is the figural aftereffect an aftereffect?"

1968 ◽  
Vol 70 (3, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 198-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludwig Immergluck
Keyword(s):  
Figural Aftereffect

scholarly journals Effects of inspection figure persistence on a figural aftereffect

1965 ◽  
Vol 2 (1-12) ◽  
pp. 279-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weneke J. Seltzer ◽  
Charles L. Sheridan
Keyword(s):  
Figural Aftereffect ◽  
Inspection Figure

Anchor Effects and Figural Aftereffects: A Comparative Psychophysical Investigation

1975 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 791-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Abresch ◽  
Viktor Sarris
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Onset Asynchrony ◽  
Contrast Effect ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Stimulus Onset ◽  
Figural Aftereffect ◽  
Anchor Effect ◽  
Substantial Influence ◽  
Perceptual Contrast ◽  
Points Of View ◽  
Onset Asynchrony

Perceptual contrast effect was studied from two points of view, as a special anchor effect and as a special figural aftereffect. Two experiments were conducted to investigate the influence of stimulus onset asynchrony on contrast and assimilation effects, induced and measured by different psychophysical methods. Stimuli were circular beams of light projected on screens (Delboef type of illusion). When anchor and series stimuli were shown and the latter were judged by means of a rating scale, stimulus onset asychrony had no substantial influence on the contrast effect (Exp. I). When the constant method was applied, however, the asynchrony altered the shape of the contrast effect considerably (Exp. II).

Untersuchungen zur Lokalisierung von Wahrnehmungsprozessen: Figurale Nachwirkungen bei binokularen Wettstreit-Bedingungen

Perception ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Crabus ◽  
M Stadler
Keyword(s):  
Visual System ◽  
Binocular Rivalry ◽  
Figural Aftereffect ◽  
Area 17 ◽  
Inspection Figure

Figural aftereffects were measured under binocular-rivalry conditions, the suppressed part of the binocular-rivalry situation being used as an inspection figure. The results show that figural aftereffects are reduced in a partly suppressed configuration and disappear completely when the inspection figure is fully suppressed. This indicates that the figural aftereffect process is localized at a higher level in the visual system than area 17.

scholarly journals Induction-, test-, and comparison-figure interactions under illusion and figural aftereffect conditions

1973 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger B. Howard ◽  
Gary W. Evansf ◽  
John K. Mcdonald
Keyword(s):  
Figural Aftereffect ◽  
Comparison Figure

16 PF Correlates of Perceptual Reactance

1982 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 451-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Mahoney ◽  
Todd Brown
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Figural Aftereffect ◽  
Personality Correlates ◽  
Trait Model ◽  
State Component

College students ( n = 24 males, 36 females) volunteered to take the kinesthetic figural aftereffect task and the 16 PF in a survey of state versus trait personality correlates of perceptual reactance. A reliable emergence of the trait component of perceptual reactance over trials was noted. Perceptual reducers were outgoing, affected by feelings, happy-go-lucky, practical, and undisciplined, while augmenters were reserved, stable, sober, imaginative, and controlled. Findings tend to support the trait model of perceptual reactance, with interference from a state component.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document