Mediated transfer in paired-associate learning as a function of presentation rate and stimulus meaningfulness.

1966 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 820-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Richardson ◽  
Bruce L. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Paired Associate ◽  
Presentation Rate ◽  
Paired Associate Learning ◽  
Associate Learning ◽  
Stimulus Meaningfulness

Presentation Rate Effects on Paired Associate Learning by Attention Deficit Disordered Children

1986 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Conte ◽  
Marcel Kinsbourne ◽  
James Swanson ◽  
Harry Zirk ◽  
Marilyn Samuels
Keyword(s):  
Attention Deficit ◽  
Paired Associate ◽  
Presentation Rate ◽  
Paired Associate Learning ◽  
Associate Learning ◽  
Rate Effects

Effects of Associative Reaction Time and Meaningfulness of Stimulus Terms in Forward and Backward Paired-Associate Learning

1970 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 867-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Ley ◽  
David Locascio
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Recall Test ◽  
Paired Associate ◽  
Presentation Rate ◽  
Paired Associate Learning ◽  
Associate Learning ◽  
Backward Recall ◽  
Long Latency ◽  
Stimulus Recognition ◽  
Stage Analysis

48 Ss learned a list of PAs, at either a 2-sec. or 7-sec. presentation rate (PR), in which the stimulus terms were assessed on the bases of associative reaction time (RT) and meaningfulness (M). In forward anticipation learning, the effect of RT of stimulus terms was not significant but M was, with the greatest effect at the 2-sec. PR. In a backward recall test, the short-latency RT stimulus terms were recalled more frequently than the long-latency RT terms and high-M terms were recalled more frequently than low-M terms. The results were interpreted in terms of a two-stage analysis in which the effects of M were related to stimulus recognition and the effects of RT to stimulus recall.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document