Creation of a Special Mental Health Parole Unit for the Connecticut Department of Correction

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Ducate
2003 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Haney

This article discusses the recent increase in the use of solitary-like confinement, especially the rise of so-called supermax prisons and the special mental health issues and challenges they pose. After briefly discussing the nature of these specialized and increasingly widespread units and the forces that have given rise to them, the article reviews some of the unique mental-health-related issues they present, including the large literature that exists on the negative psychological effects of isolation and the unusually high percentage of mentally ill prisoners who are confined there. It ends with a brief discussion of recent caselaw that addresses some of these mental health issues and suggests that the courts, though in some ways appropriately solicitous of the plight of mentally ill supermax prisoners, have overlooked some of the broader psychological problems these units create.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
Dumilah Ayuningtyas ◽  
Marisa Rayhani ◽  
Misnaniarti Misnaniarti ◽  
Asri Nur Maulidya

Mental health disorders are still one of the most prominent health problems in the world, including in Indonesia. There is still a misguided stigma and discrimination on people with mental disorders, so more than 56,000 of them experience restraint. This study aims to determine the efforts and review the implementation of Law no. 18/2014 about Mental Health until 2017. This is a policy study using literature review. Descriptive exploration is done using a policy analysis framework in the implementation phase based on Edwards III model. The unit of analysis is mental health policy in Indonesia. The results show that only a few local governments initiate special mental health regulations as well as more operational programs. Activities are still focused on curative and rehabilitative efforts. There has been prevention of deprivation through the ‘Indonesia Free Restraint’ program since 1977 but this has not gone well. The communication process encountered problems of unclear and inconsistent information. Moreover, not all local governments use the authority to regulate the mental health policy to mobilize resources. Law no. 18/2014 has not been implemented optimally. Not all implementers and policy targets are dedicated to direction of the Law. Neither not all aspects of mental health efforts have programs, Standard Operating Procedure and coordination governance. Conversely, optimal implementation can be done by introducing it as an element of primary health in basic health service.


2006 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohiuddin Ahmed ◽  
Charles M. Boisvert

1994 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 560-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Rosenman

In this paper I argue that specific mental health law should not exist and should be replaced by modern guardianship law which is non-discriminatory and which intervenes according to need rather than diagnostic classification. Substituted consent provided by a guardian protects the patient and the treatment provider. Custody to prevent danger to others should remain with courts rather than informal proceedings where individual rights to freedom are less carefully protected. Special mental health law stigmatises people with mental illness and degrades their treatment. It also diminishes the standing of the psychiatric profession which advocates the continuation of such laws.


1994 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 554-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom D. Campbell

The aim of the paper is to propose that special mental health laws be replaced by generic protection and prevention legislation. The arguments used for the detention and compulsory treatment of persons with mental illnesses are analysed, and found not to justify protection and prevention rules which apply only to persons with mental illnesses. Two separate systems of legal intervention should be established to deal with (1) all persons in need of compulsory care and (2) all persons who require to be detained for the prevention of harm to others.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e045794
Author(s):  
Shuja Reagu ◽  
Ovais Wadoo ◽  
Javed Latoo ◽  
Deborah Nelson ◽  
Sami Ouanes ◽  
...  

SettingThe State of Qatar has had one of the highest COVID-19 infection rates globally and has used state-managed quarantine and isolation centres to limit the spread of infection. Quarantine and isolation have been shown to negatively affect the mental health of individuals. Qatar has a unique population, with around 90% of the population being economic migrants and a majority being blue-collar workers and labourers.ObjectivesThis study was carried out to evaluate the psychological impact of institutional isolation and quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak in Qatar. The study also explored the sociodemographic correlates of this psychological impact.Design, participants and interventionA cross-sectional study involving 748 consenting individuals in institutional quarantine and isolation in Qatar during the months of June and July 2020 was carried out. Relevant sociodemographic data along with depressive and anxiety symptomatology scores were collected from consenting adults at these facilities.Results37.4% (n=270) of respondents reported depressive symptoms and 25.9% (n=189) reported anxiety symptoms. The scores were higher for individuals in isolation facilities and higher for migrants from poor socioeconomic group (p<0.001 for both). Within this group, although worries about infection were widely reported, lack of contact with the family was cited as one of the most important sources of distress. Respondents reported that contact with the family and reliable information were important factors that helped during the duration of isolation and quarantine.ConclusionsOur study reported significantly elevated scores for depression and anxiety during institutional quarantine, which is in keeping with emerging evidence. However, in contrast to other studies reporting mostly from native populations, this study of a population with an overwhelming majority of immigrants highlights the special mental health needs of this specific group and can inform future healthcare policies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document