A Fan Effect in Anaphor Resolution

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin S. Autry ◽  
William H. Levine
Keyword(s):  
Anaphor Resolution ◽  
Fan Effect

When Does Anaphor Resolution Fail?

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celia M. Klin ◽  
Alexandria E. Guzman ◽  
Kristin M. Weingartner ◽  
William M. Levine
Keyword(s):  
Anaphor Resolution

When Anaphor Resolution Fails

2000 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 594-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H Levine ◽  
Alexandria E Guzmán ◽  
Celia M Klin
Keyword(s):  
Anaphor Resolution

scholarly journals Working memory, reading ability and the effects of distance and typicality on anaphor resolution in children

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 622-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly S. S. L. Joseph ◽  
Georgina Bremner ◽  
Simon P. Liversedge ◽  
Kate Nation
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Reading Ability ◽  
Anaphor Resolution

The structure of situation models as revealed by anaphor resolution

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 104-115
Author(s):  
Sashank Varma ◽  
Amanda Janssen
Keyword(s):  
Situation Models ◽  
Anaphor Resolution

Affective Integration Speeds Trait Processing

2005 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 810-818
Author(s):  
Takashi Nakao ◽  
Makoto Miyatani
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Personality Trait ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Speed Of Processing ◽  
Repeated Measures Design ◽  
Fan Effect ◽  
Students First ◽  
Recognition Judgments ◽  
Affective Value

We investigated whether affective integration increases the speed of processing of personality trait knowledge. The fan effect was compared between cases where trait knowledge is stored with the affective value and cases where it is not stored with the affective value. 18 college students first memorized a set of traits about fictitious individuals and then made recognition judgments. In the 2 × 2 factorial repeated-measures design, the number of traits learned about a fictitious individual and whether those traits were integrated by a shared affective value were manipulated. The significant interaction showed that knowledge of personality trait with affective integration was processed quickly even if the particular person's memory had rich connections with traits.

scholarly journals A SEMI-CLASSICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROTON SEQUENTIAL EMISSION IN 16O+58Ni DEEP INELASTIC COLLISIONS

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (02) ◽  
pp. 239-254
Author(s):  
L. AUDITORE ◽  
R. BARNÁ ◽  
D. DE PASQUALE ◽  
A. ITALIANO ◽  
A. TRIFIRÓ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Charged Particles ◽  
Inelastic Collisions ◽  
Classical Analysis ◽  
Fan Effect ◽  
Decay Times ◽  
Inelastic Reaction ◽  
Polarization Phenomena ◽  
Deep Inelastic Reaction ◽  
Light Charged Particles ◽  
Α Particles

We study the 16 O +58 Ni deep inelastic reaction by using coincident charged techniques. Inclusive as well as exclusive data of the C , N , and O fully-damped fragments and their associated light charged particles ( p , d , t , and α-particles) have been collected at the IReS Strasbourg VIVITRON Tandem facility. The velocity distributions of the emitted protons and the associated multiplicity polar plots are analyzed by means of a model which describes simultaneously the nonequilibrium and the evaporative (equilibrated) components of a deep inelastic reaction mechanism. Estimates on polarization phenomena as well as the associated "decay times" of the reaction have been obtained. The hypothesis of a new "fan effect" is proposed for the proton sequential emission in the deep inelastic scattering of 16 O +58 Ni at 8.25 MeV/nucleon.

scholarly journals Anaphora: Text-based or discourse-dependent?

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Cornish
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Interaction ◽  
Discourse Representation ◽  
Computational Approaches ◽  
Anaphor Resolution ◽  
Language Structure ◽  
Traditional Definition ◽  
On Line ◽  
Full Sense ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Sense And Reference

The traditional definition of anaphora in purely co-textual terms as a relation between two co-occurring expressions is in wide currency in theoretical and descriptive studies of the phenomenon. Indeed, it is currently adopted in on-line psycholinguistic experiments on the interpretation of anaphors, and is the basis for all computational approaches to automatic anaphor resolution (see Mitkov 2002). Under this conception, the anaphor, a referentially-dependent expression type, requires “saturation” by an appropriate referentially-autonomous, lexically-based expression — the antecedent — in order to achieve full sense and reference. However, this definition needs to be re-examined in the light of the ways in which real texts operate and are understood, where the resulting picture is rather different. The article aims to show that the co-textual conception is misconceived, and that anaphora is essentially an integrative, discourse-creating procedure involving a three-way relationship between an “antecedent trigger”, an anaphoric predication, and a salient discourse representation. It is shown that it is only in terms of a dynamic interaction amongst the interdependent dimensions of text and discourse, as well as context, that the true complexity of anaphoric reference may be satisfactorily described. The article is intended as a contribution to the broader debate within the pages of this journal and elsewhere between the formalist and the functionalist accounts of language structure and use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document