scholarly journals Effects of first stage variations of stimulus meaningfulness and response meaningfulness in the A-B, B-C, A-C paradigm.

1975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Molander ◽  
Jorgen Garvill
1978 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-257
Author(s):  
Marla Kahn-Edrington ◽  
Coleman Merryman ◽  
Shelli Helm ◽  
Gary Okowita

Paired-associate transfer in the A-D, A-B paradigm was negative for stimuli of high meaningfulness but not for stimuli of low meaningfulness. This result is consistent with Martin's hypothesis of variable encoding.


2000 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Lyddy ◽  
Dermot Barnes-Holmes ◽  
Peter J. Hampson

1966 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 917-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Bryk ◽  
Donald H. Kausler

1965 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 491-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald J. Mueller ◽  
Robert M. W. Travers

Each of 34 Ss was presented with a list of 12 paired associates which were arranged according to high-low or low-high stimulus and response meaningfulness and also in a simultaneous or sequential time relationship. Meaningfulness level on the stimulus side of the dyad rather than on the response side was found to be more crucial for learning, and significantly more learning occurred also when the dyads were presented in the simultaneous condition. The findings were discussed in terms of both association theory and the differences between the present procedure and the conventional anticipation method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document