Collaborative Care: New Rule Will Change the Psychologist-Physician Relationship

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Daw
2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 6-8
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham

Abstract The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fifth Edition, explains that independent medical evaluations (IMEs) are not the same as impairment evaluations, and the evaluation must be designed to provide the data to answer the questions asked by the requesting client. This article continues discussions from the September/October issue of The Guides Newsletter and examines what occurs after the examinee arrives in the physician's office. First are orientation and obtaining informed consent, and the examinee must understand that there is no patient–physician relationship and the physician will not provide treatment bur rather will send a report to the client who requested the IME. Many physicians ask the examinee to complete a questionnaire and a series of pain inventories before the interview. Typical elements of a complete history are shown in a table. An equally detailed physical examination follows a meticulous history, and standardized forms for reporting these findings are useful. Pain and functional status inventories may supplement the evaluation, and the examining physician examines radiographic and diagnostic studies. The physician informs the interviewee when the evaluation is complete and, without discussing the findings, asks the examinee to complete a satisfaction survey and reviews the latter to identify and rectify any issues before the examinee leaves. A future article will discuss high-quality IME reports.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne E. Ciccone ◽  
Erin T. Reuther ◽  
Howard J. Osofsky ◽  
Joy D. Osofsky

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-254
Author(s):  
Diane M. Powers ◽  
Deborah J. Bowen ◽  
Robert F. Arao ◽  
Melinda Vredevoogd ◽  
Joan Russo ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 236-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul R. King ◽  
Gregory P. Beehler ◽  
Christina L. Vair ◽  
Julie Gass ◽  
Jennifer S. Funderburk ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  

Within a clinical sports medical setting the discussion about doping is insufficient. In elite-sports use of pharmaceutical agents is daily business in order to maintain the expected top-level performance. Unfortunately, a similar development could be observed in the general population of leisure athletes where medical supervision is absent. As a sports physician you are facing imminent ethical questions when standing in between. Therefore, we propose the application of a standardised risk score as a tool to promote doping-prevention and launch the debate within athlete-physician-relationship. In the longterm such kind of risk stratification systems may support decision-making with regard to «protective» exclusion of sporting competition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document