scholarly journals The development of real-time stability supports visual working memory performance: Young children’s feature binding can be improved through perceptual structure.

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
pp. 1474-1493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa R. Simmering ◽  
Chelsey M. Wood
2020 ◽  
pp. 174702182096071
Author(s):  
Richard J Allen ◽  
Amy L Atkinson ◽  
Louise A Brown Nicholls

Visual working memory for features and bindings is susceptible to age-related decline. Two experiments were used to examine whether older adults are able to strategically prioritise more valuable information in working memory and whether this could reduce age-related impairments. Younger (18–33 years) and older (60–90 years) adults were presented with coloured shapes and, following a brief delay, asked to recall the feature that had accompanied the probe item. In Experiment 1, participants were either asked to prioritise a more valuable object in the array (serial position 1, 2, or 3) or to treat them all equally. Older adults exhibited worse overall memory performance but were as able as younger adults to prioritise objects. In both groups, this ability was particularly apparent at the middle serial position. Experiment 2 then explored whether younger and older adults’ prioritisation is affected by presentation time. Replicating Experiment 1, older adults were able to prioritise the more valuable object in working memory, showing equivalent benefits and costs as younger adults. However, processing speed, as indexed by presentation time, was shown not to limit strategic prioritisation in either age group. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that, although older adults have poorer visual working memory overall, the ability to strategically direct attention to more valuable items in working memory is preserved across ageing.


2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 1769-1776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalia Mohamed ◽  
Ibrahim Elsayed ◽  
Aly Fahmy Mohamed ◽  
Soad Ali Yehia

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Yang Dong ◽  
Yan Xu ◽  
Pei Zhang ◽  
Kit Po Wong

Author(s):  
Farzad Ferdowsi ◽  
Hesan Vahedi ◽  
Ali Jafarian Abianeh ◽  
Chris S. Edrington ◽  
Touria Elmezyani

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 902-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel E. Asp ◽  
Viola S. Störmer ◽  
Timothy F. Brady

Abstract Almost all models of visual working memory—the cognitive system that holds visual information in an active state—assume it has a fixed capacity: Some models propose a limit of three to four objects, where others propose there is a fixed pool of resources for each basic visual feature. Recent findings, however, suggest that memory performance is improved for real-world objects. What supports these increases in capacity? Here, we test whether the meaningfulness of a stimulus alone influences working memory capacity while controlling for visual complexity and directly assessing the active component of working memory using EEG. Participants remembered ambiguous stimuli that could either be perceived as a face or as meaningless shapes. Participants had higher performance and increased neural delay activity when the memory display consisted of more meaningful stimuli. Critically, by asking participants whether they perceived the stimuli as a face or not, we also show that these increases in visual working memory capacity and recruitment of additional neural resources are because of the subjective perception of the stimulus and thus cannot be driven by physical properties of the stimulus. Broadly, this suggests that the capacity for active storage in visual working memory is not fixed but that more meaningful stimuli recruit additional working memory resources, allowing them to be better remembered.


NeuroImage ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 794-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore P. Zanto ◽  
James Z. Chadick ◽  
Adam Gazzaley

Author(s):  
Mladen Kezunovic ◽  
Sakis Meliopoulos ◽  
Vaithianathan Venkatasubramanian ◽  
Vijay Vittal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document