But what do participants want? Comment on the “Data Sharing in Psychology” special section (2018).

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorden A. Cummings ◽  
T. Eugene Day
Keyword(s):  
Data Sharing ◽  
Special Section

Introduction to the special section on Increasing Replicability, Transparency, and Openness in Clinical Psychology

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L Tackett ◽  
Josh Miller
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Special Section ◽  
Psychological Research ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Clinical Psychologists ◽  
Existing Problems

As psychological research comes under increasing fire for the crisis of replicability, attention has turned to methods and practices that facilitate (or hinder) a more replicable and veridical body of empirical evidence. These trends have focused on “open science” initiatives, including an emphasis on replication, transparency, and data sharing. Despite this broader movement in psychology, clinical psychologists and psychiatrists have been largely absent from the broader conversation on documenting the extent of existing problems as well as generating solutions to problematic methods and practices in our area (Tackett et al., 2017). The goal of the current special section was to bring together psychopathology researchers to explore these and related areas as they pertain to the types of research conducted in clinical psychology and allied disciplines.

Introduction to the Special Section

2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 250-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Dalbert
Keyword(s):  
Special Section
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document