On the costs of lag-1 sparing.

Paul E. Dux; Brad Wyble; Pierre Jolicœur; Roberto Dell'Acqua

doi:10.1037/a0033949

On the costs of lag-1 sparing.

Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance ◽

10.1037/a0033949 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 40 (1) ◽

pp. 416-428 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Paul E. Dux ◽

Brad Wyble ◽

Pierre Jolicœur ◽

Roberto Dell'Acqua

Keyword(s):

Lag 1 Sparing

Download Full-text

Supplemental Material for The Number of Expected Targets Modulates Access to Working Memory: A New Unified Account of Lag-1 Sparing and Distractor Intrusions

Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance ◽

10.1037/xhp0000958.supp ◽

2021 ◽

Keyword(s):

Working Memory ◽

Lag 1 Sparing

Download Full-text

Modality-specific auditory and visual temporal processing deficits

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A ◽

10.1080/02724980143000136 ◽

2002 ◽

Vol 55 (1) ◽

pp. 23-40 ◽

Cited By ~ 81

Author(s):

Salvador Soto-Faraco ◽

Charles Spence

Keyword(s):

Attentional Blink ◽

Temporal Processing ◽

Spatial Location ◽

Visual Presentation ◽

Attentional Selection ◽

The Other ◽

Repetition Blindness ◽

Presentation Procedure ◽

Selection Stage ◽

Lag 1 Sparing

We studied the attentional blink (AB) and the repetition blindness (RB) effects using an audio-visual presentation procedure designed to overcome several potential methodological confounds in previous cross-modal research. In Experiment 1, two target digits were embedded amongst letter distractors in two concurrent streams (one visual and the other auditory) presented from the same spatial location. Targets appeared in either modality unpredictably at different temporal lags, and the participants’ task was to recall the digits at the end of the trial. We evaluated both AB and RB for pairs of targets presented in either the same or different modalities. Under these conditions both AB and RB were observed in vision, AB but not RB was observed in audition, and there was no evidence of AB or RB cross-modally from audition to vision or vice versa. In Experiment 2, we further investigated the AB by including Lag 1 items and observed Lag 1 sparing, thus ruling out the possibility that the observed effects were due to perceptual and/or conceptual masking. Our results support a distinction between a modality-specific interference at the attentional selection stage and a modality-independent interference at later processing stages. They also provide a new dissociation between the AB and RB.

Download Full-text