Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: A review and meta-analysis.

2012 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. 998-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klodiana Lanaj ◽  
Chu-Hsiang “Daisy” Chang ◽  
Russell E. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Focus ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Work Related

A meta-analysis of the regulatory focus nomological network: Work-related antecedents and consequences

2012 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Allen Gorman ◽  
John P. Meriac ◽  
Benjamin L. Overstreet ◽  
Steven Apodaca ◽  
Ashley L. McIntyre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Focus ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Nomological Network ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Antecedents And Consequences

Affectivity dispositions and work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Ng ◽  
Jill A. Brown ◽  
Robert J. Vandenberg
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Work Related

scholarly journals Stigmatization from Work-Related COVID-19 Exposure: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 6183
Author(s):  
Melanie Schubert ◽  
Julia Ludwig ◽  
Alice Freiberg ◽  
Taurai Monalisa Hahne ◽  
Karla Romero Starke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Occupational Groups ◽  
Single Item ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Quantitative Studies ◽  
Study Protocols ◽  
Adequate Sampling ◽  
Convenience Sampling ◽  
Questionnaire Studies

Stigmatization from work-related COVID-19 exposure has not been investigated in detail yet. Therefore, we systematically searched three databases: Medline, Embase, and PsychInfo (until October 2020), and performed a grey literature search (until February 2021). We identified 46 suitable articles from 24 quantitative and 11 qualitative studies, 6 systematic reviews, 3 study protocols and 1 intervention. The assessment of stigmatization varied widely, ranging from a single-item question to a 22-item questionnaire. Studies mostly considered perceived self-stigma (27 of 35 original studies) in healthcare workers (HCWs) or hospital-related jobs (29 of 35). All articles reported on stigmatization as a result of work-related COVID-19 exposure. However, most quantitative studies were characterized by convenience sampling (17 of 24), and all studies—also those with an adequate sampling design—were considered of low methodological quality. Therefore, it is not possible to determine prevalence of stigmatization in defined occupational groups. Nevertheless, the work-related stigmatization of occupational groups with or without suspected contact to COVID-19 is a relevant problem and increases the risk for depression (odds ratio (OR) = 1.74; 95% confidence interval CI 1.29–2.36) and anxiety (OR = 1.64; 95% CI 1.18–2.28). For promoting workers’ health, anti-stigma strategies and support should be implemented in the workplace.

Gender, age and tenure as moderators of work-related stressors' relationships with job performance: A meta-analysis

2008 ◽  
Vol 61 (10) ◽  
pp. 1371-1398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arie Shirom ◽  
Simona Shechter Gilboa ◽  
Yitzhak Fried ◽  
Cary L. Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Job Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Work Related Stressors

Prevalence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries among At-Risk Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 225 (4) ◽  
pp. e158
Author(s):  
Sherise Epstein ◽  
Bao Ngoc N. Tran ◽  
Qing Z. Ruan ◽  
Dhruv Singhal ◽  
Bernard T. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Musculoskeletal Injuries ◽  
Work Related

Work-related psychosocial factors and metabolic syndrome onset among workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 1557-1568 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Watanabe ◽  
A. Sakuraya ◽  
N. Kawakami ◽  
K. Imamura ◽  
E. Ando ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Psychosocial Factors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Work Related

scholarly journals The prevalence and risk factors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among adults in Ethiopia: a study protocol for extending a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsiwaye Gebreyesus ◽  
Kalkidan Nigussie ◽  
Moges Gashaw ◽  
Balamurugan Janakiraman
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽  
Abstract Data ◽  
Size Type ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Background Work-related musculoskeletal disorders impose a significant and most often underappreciated burden to the individual, nation, healthcare system, and society as a whole. To the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of reliable estimates on the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in Ethiopia. The objective of this study will be to assess the existing literature on the prevalence rates and determinant factors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in Ethiopia. Method We will search PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, PEDro, and Ebsco (from January 2000 onwards). Gray literature will be identified through searching Google Scholar and dissertation databases. Observational studies reporting on the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among adult Ethiopians will be included. The primary outcome will be the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Secondary outcomes will be the prevalence of any risk factors in association with work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using an appropriate tool. If feasible, we will conduct random effects meta-analysis of observational data. Subgroup analyses will be conducted to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity (e.g., gender, sample size, type of occupation). Publication bias and heterogeneity between the included studies will also be assessed and reported. Discussion This systematic review will provide a synthesis of the literature on the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders and their risk factors in Ethiopia. The results of this review could help the policymakers in occupational health and healthcare sectors in identifying priority areas for interventions in work-related musculoskeletal disorders and will also serve as a baseline for the decision-making processes of musculoskeletal health promotion, work exposure implementations, and prevention programs in workplaces. Systematic review registration PROSPERO, CRD42020164240

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document