The Primacy of Embedded Intergroup Relations Theory

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Springer
Keyword(s):  
Intergroup Relations ◽  
Embedded Intergroup Relations

The Professional Life of Clayton Paul Alderfer

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-179
Author(s):  
David N. Berg ◽  
Kenwyn K. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Race Relations ◽  
Intergroup Relations ◽  
Early Adulthood ◽  
Adult Life ◽  
Professional Life ◽  
Chronological Order ◽  
Late Adulthood ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
Embedded Intergroup Relations ◽  
The People

Clayton Paul Alderfer died on October 30, 2015. In addition to the people he left behind (family, friends, colleagues, and former students), Clay also bequeathed a richly varied scholarly legacy. This article introduces the reader to Alderfer’s life and work. Since Alderfer believed that one’s work is influenced by one’s stage of life, his work is presented in chronological order from early adulthood through late adulthood. What emerges is a picture of how the major intellectual themes he worked on—need theory, embedded intergroup relations, organizational diagnosis, and race relations—developed over the course of his adult life. Alderfer is presented in his own words, sentences and paragraphs excerpted from his published legacy, to minimize interpretation and maximize the reader’s exposure to the man and his ideas.

scholarly journals Embedded Intergroup Relations in Interdisciplinary Teams

1997 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Lichtenstein ◽  
Jeffrey A. Alexander ◽  
Kimberly Jinnett ◽  
Esther Ullman
Keyword(s):  
Intergroup Relations ◽  
Interdisciplinary Teams ◽  
Embedded Intergroup Relations

Reducing Prejudice Through Narratives

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 185-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Moyer-Gusé ◽  
Katherine R. Dale ◽  
Michelle Ortiz
Keyword(s):  
Intergroup Relations ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Intergroup Contact ◽  
Contact Hypothesis ◽  
Muslim Americans ◽  
Intergroup Anxiety ◽  
Intergroup Interactions

Abstract. Recent extensions to the contact hypothesis reveal that different forms of contact, such as mediated intergroup contact, can reduce intergroup anxiety and improve attitudes toward the outgroup. This study draws on existing research to further consider the role of identification with an ingroup character within a narrative depicting intergroup contact between Muslim and non-Muslim Americans. Results reveal that identification with the non-Muslim (ingroup) model facilitated liking the Muslim (outgroup) model, which reduced prejudice toward Muslims more generally. Identification with the ingroup model also increased conversational self-efficacy and reduced anxiety about future intergroup interactions – both important aspects of improving intergroup relations.

Mutuality in Acculturation

2013 ◽  
Vol 221 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Horenczyk ◽  
Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti ◽  
David L. Sam ◽  
Paul Vedder
Keyword(s):  
Intergroup Relations ◽  
Extended Model ◽  
Psychological Study ◽  
Intergroup Interactions ◽  
Mutual Contact ◽  
Acculturation Model ◽  
Plural Societies ◽  
Perceptions And Expectations

This paper focuses on processes and consequences of intergroup interactions in plural societies, focusing primarily on majority-minority mutuality in acculturation orientations. We examine commonalities and differences among conceptualizations and models addressing issues of mutuality. Our review includes the mutual acculturation model ( Berry, 1997 ), the Interactive Acculturation Model (IAM – Bourhis et al., 1997 ), the Concordance Model of Acculturation (CMA – Piontkowski et al., 2002 ); the Relative Acculturation Extended Model (RAEM – Navas et al., 2005 ), and the work on acculturation discrepancies conducted by Horenczyk (1996 , 2000 ). We also describe a trend toward convergence of acculturation research and the socio-psychological study of intergroup relations addressing issues of mutuality in attitudes, perceptions, and expectations. Our review has the potential to enrich the conceptual and methodological toolbox needed for understanding and investigating acculturation in complex modern societies, where majorities and minorities, immigrants and nationals, are engaged in continuous mutual contact and interaction, affecting each other’s acculturative choices and acculturative expectations.

An Incomplete Perspective on Intergroup Relations

1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-251
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Pettigrew
Keyword(s):  
Intergroup Relations
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document