scholarly journals Development of the Trauma Play Scale: Comparison of children manifesting a history of interpersonal trauma with a normative sample.

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E. Myers ◽  
Sue C. Bratton ◽  
Carol Hagen ◽  
Jennifer H. Findling
1992 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1114-1125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Felsenfeld ◽  
Patricia A. Broen ◽  
Matt McGue

The present investigation is a follow-up to a longitudinal speech and academic study involving approximately 400 normally developing children begun in 1960 by Mildred Templin. From this large data base, the present project invited the participation of two groups of subjects (now aged 32 to 34): (a) 24 adults with a documented history of moderately severe phonological disorder that persisted at least through the end of first grade (probands) and (b) 28 adults from the same birth cohort and schools who were known to have had at least average articulation skills over the same period (controls). Results of follow-up testing revealed that the proband adults performed significantly more poorly than the control adults on all of the administered measures of articulation, expressive language, and receptive language. Results obtained from a screening of nonverbal reasoning ability were equivocal. On a questionnaire measure of personality, both groups scored well within the normal range for the dimensions of extroversion and neuroticism when compared to the test’s normative sample. These results have been interpreted as suggesting that although many adults with a childhood history of delayed phonological development will continue to experience linguistic outcomes that are less favorable than those of controls, their performance in selected nonlanguage domains (e.g., nonverbal reasoning, personality) will be far more typical of the general population.


Dreaming ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anika Wiltgen Blanchard ◽  
Katrina Rufino ◽  
Elizabeth Hartwig Rea ◽  
Kieran Paddock ◽  
Michelle A. Patriquin

Psychotherapy ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelley A. Riggs ◽  
Deborah Jacobovitz ◽  
Nancy Hazen

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (17-18) ◽  
pp. 3601-3621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derrecka M. Boykin ◽  
Qweandria T. Dunn ◽  
Holly K. Orcutt

Experiencing repeated trauma can have increasingly detrimental effects on psychosocial functioning after subsequent stressors. These effects may be intensified for victims of interpersonal traumas given that these events are often associated with heightened risk for adverse outcomes. To better understand this relationship, the present study prospectively examined the effect of pre-shooting trauma exposure (i.e., interpersonal vs. non-interpersonal trauma) on psychological functioning (i.e., posttraumatic stress symptoms, depression) following a mass campus shooting. Based on previous research, it was expected that negative appraisals and social support would mediate this relationship. A sample of 515 college women reporting prior trauma exposure was assessed at four time points following the shooting (i.e., pre-shooting, 1-month, 6-months, and 12-months post-shooting). Bootstrap analyses with bias-corrected confidence intervals were conducted. Contrary to expectation, pre-shooting trauma exposure was unrelated to 12-month post-shooting outcomes and neither negative appraisals nor social support at 6-months post-shooting emerged as mediators. Interestingly, a history of non-interpersonal trauma was associated with greater post-shooting family and friend support than a history of interpersonal trauma. Ad hoc analyses showed that pre-shooting symptom severity and level of exposure to the shooting had indirect effects on post-shooting outcomes via post-shooting negative appraisals. These findings support that cumulative trauma, regardless of type, may not have an additive effect unless individuals develop clinically significant symptoms following previous trauma. Trauma severity also appears to play a meaningful role.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document