The ubiquitous nature of the Hebb repetition effect: Error learning mistaken for the absence of sequence learning.

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 515-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Lafond ◽  
Sébastien Tremblay ◽  
Fabrice Parmentier
2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Ève St-Louis ◽  
Robert W. Hughes ◽  
Jean Saint-Aubin ◽  
Sébastien Tremblay

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 852-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Oberauer ◽  
Timothy Jones ◽  
Stephan Lewandowsky

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 792-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Claude Guerrette ◽  
Katherine Guérard ◽  
Jean Saint-Aubin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Goecke ◽  
Klaus Oberauer

In tests of working memory with verbal or spatial materials repeating the same memory sets across trials leads to improved memory performance. This well-established “Hebb repetition effect” could not be shown for visual materials. This absence of the Hebb effect can be explained in two ways: Either persons fail to acquire a long-term memory representation of the repeated memory sets, or they acquire such long-term memory representations, but fail to use them during the working memory task. In two experiments, (N1 = 18 and N2 = 30), we aimed to decide between these two possibilities by manipulating the long-term memory knowledge of some of the memory sets used in a change-detection task. Before the change-detection test, participants learned three arrays of colors to criterion. The subsequent change-detection test contained both previously learned and new color arrays. Change detection performance was better on previously learned compared to new arrays, showing that long-term memory is used in change detection.


2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1720-1729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Couture ◽  
Sébastien Tremblay

Author(s):  
Benjamin Goecke ◽  
Klaus Oberauer

AbstractIn tests of working memory with verbal or spatial materials, repeating the same memory sets across trials leads to improved memory performance. This well-established “Hebb repetition effect” could not be shown for visual materials in previous research. The absence of the Hebb effect can be explained in two ways: Either persons fail to acquire a long-term memory representation of the repeated memory sets, or they acquire such long-term memory representations, but fail to use them during the working memory task. In two experiments (N1 = 18 and N2 = 30), we aimed to decide between these two possibilities by manipulating the long-term memory knowledge of some of the memory sets used in a change-detection task. Before the change-detection test, participants learned three arrays of colors to criterion. The subsequent change-detection test contained both previously learned and new color arrays. Change detection performance was better on previously learned compared with new arrays, showing that long-term memory is used in change detection.


Author(s):  
Jean Saint-Aubin ◽  
Katherine Guérard ◽  
Sylvain Fiset ◽  
Marie-Claire Losier

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document