scholarly journals Exploring the characteristics of the visuospatial hebb repetition effect

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1720-1729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Couture ◽  
Sébastien Tremblay
Keyword(s):  
Repetition Effect ◽  
Hebb Repetition Effect

scholarly journals The Hebb repetition effect in simple and complex memory span

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 852-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Oberauer ◽  
Timothy Jones ◽  
Stephan Lewandowsky
Keyword(s):  
Memory Span ◽  
Repetition Effect ◽  
Hebb Repetition Effect

scholarly journals The role of overt language production in the Hebb repetition effect

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 792-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Claude Guerrette ◽  
Katherine Guérard ◽  
Jean Saint-Aubin
Keyword(s):  
Language Production ◽  
Repetition Effect ◽  
Hebb Repetition Effect ◽  
Overt Language Production

scholarly journals Is Long-Term Memory Used in a Visuo-Spatial Change-Detection Paradigm?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Goecke ◽  
Klaus Oberauer
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Change Detection ◽  
Memory Performance ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Repetition Effect ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Memory Representation ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Hebb Repetition Effect

In tests of working memory with verbal or spatial materials repeating the same memory sets across trials leads to improved memory performance. This well-established “Hebb repetition effect” could not be shown for visual materials. This absence of the Hebb effect can be explained in two ways: Either persons fail to acquire a long-term memory representation of the repeated memory sets, or they acquire such long-term memory representations, but fail to use them during the working memory task. In two experiments, (N1 = 18 and N2 = 30), we aimed to decide between these two possibilities by manipulating the long-term memory knowledge of some of the memory sets used in a change-detection task. Before the change-detection test, participants learned three arrays of colors to criterion. The subsequent change-detection test contained both previously learned and new color arrays. Change detection performance was better on previously learned compared to new arrays, showing that long-term memory is used in change detection.

scholarly journals Is long-term memory used in a visuo-spatial change-detection paradigm?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Goecke ◽  
Klaus Oberauer
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Change Detection ◽  
Memory Performance ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Repetition Effect ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Memory Representation ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Hebb Repetition Effect

AbstractIn tests of working memory with verbal or spatial materials, repeating the same memory sets across trials leads to improved memory performance. This well-established “Hebb repetition effect” could not be shown for visual materials in previous research. The absence of the Hebb effect can be explained in two ways: Either persons fail to acquire a long-term memory representation of the repeated memory sets, or they acquire such long-term memory representations, but fail to use them during the working memory task. In two experiments (N1 = 18 and N2 = 30), we aimed to decide between these two possibilities by manipulating the long-term memory knowledge of some of the memory sets used in a change-detection task. Before the change-detection test, participants learned three arrays of colors to criterion. The subsequent change-detection test contained both previously learned and new color arrays. Change detection performance was better on previously learned compared with new arrays, showing that long-term memory is used in change detection.

Learning multiple lists at the same time in the Hebb repetition effect.

2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Saint-Aubin ◽  
Katherine Guérard ◽  
Sylvain Fiset ◽  
Marie-Claire Losier
Keyword(s):  
Repetition Effect ◽  
Hebb Repetition Effect

scholarly journals The Hebb repetition effect in complex span tasks: Evidence for a shared learning mechanism with simple span tasks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Araya ◽  
Klaus Oberauer ◽  
Satoru Saito
Keyword(s):  
Recall Performance ◽  
Repetition Effect ◽  
Span Task ◽  
Temporal Position ◽  
Complex Span ◽  
Complex Span Task ◽  
Serial Recall Task ◽  
Span Tasks ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
Hebb Repetition Effect

AbstractThe Hebb repetition effect on serial-recall task refers to the improvement in the accuracy of recall of a repeated list (e.g., repeated in every 3 trials) over random non-repeated lists. Previous research has shown that both temporal position and neighboring items need to be the same on each repetition list for the Hebb repetition effect to occur, suggesting chunking as one of its underlying mechanisms. Accordingly, one can expect absence of the Hebb repetition effect in a complex span task, given that the sequence is interrupted by distractors. Nevertheless, one study by Oberauer, Jones, and Lewandowsky (2015, Memory & Cognition, 43[6], 852–865) showed evidence of the Hebb repetition effect in a complex span task. Throughout four experiments, we confirmed the Hebb repetition effect in complex span tasks, even when we included distractors in both encoding and recall phases to avoid any resemblance to a simple span task and minimized the possibility of chunking. Results showed that the Hebb repetition effect was not affected by the distractors during encoding and recall. A transfer cycle analysis showed that the long-term knowledge acquired in the complex span task can be transferred to a simple span task. These findings provide the first insights on the mechanism behind the Hebb repetition effect in complex span tasks; it is at least partially based on the same mechanism that improves recall performance by repetition in simple span tasks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document