The emotional roots of intergroup aggression: The distinct roles of anger and hatred.

2011 ◽  
pp. 315-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eran Halperin
Keyword(s):  
Intergroup Aggression

scholarly journals Peace and war: Rewarding intergroup contacts make past intergroup aggression unforgivable.

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenchen Li ◽  
Dong-mei Li ◽  
Ziying Huang ◽  
Chi-yue Chiu
Keyword(s):  
Intergroup Aggression ◽  
Peace And War

Lethal intergroup aggression by chimpanzees in Kibale National Park, Uganda

2006 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Watts ◽  
Martin Muller ◽  
Sylvia J. Amsler ◽  
Godfrey Mbabazi ◽  
John C. Mitani
Keyword(s):  
National Park ◽  
Kibale National Park ◽  
Intergroup Aggression

scholarly journals Collective Narcissism and Its Social Consequences: The Bad and the Ugly

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Golec de Zavala ◽  
Dorottya Lantos
Keyword(s):  
Self Esteem ◽  
Social Consequences ◽  
Traditional Group ◽  
Intergroup Aggression ◽  
Emotional Resilience ◽  
Positive Identification ◽  
Group Satisfaction ◽  
Collective Self ◽  
Biased Perception ◽  
Collective Self Esteem

Collective narcissism is a belief that one’s own group (the in-group) is exceptional but not sufficiently recognized by others. It is the form of “in-group love” robustly associated with “out-group hate.” In contrast to private collective self-esteem (or in-group satisfaction, a belief that the in-group is of high value), it predicts prejudice, retaliatory intergroup aggression, and rejoicing in the suffering of other people. The pervasive association between collective narcissism and intergroup hostility is driven by a biased perception of the in-group as constantly threatened and out-groups as hostile and threatening. Collective narcissism is associated with hypersensitivity to provocation and the belief that only hostile revenge is a desirable and rewarding response. It arises when the traditional group-based hierarchies are challenged and empowers extremists as well as populist politicians. Instead of alleviating the sense of threat to one’s self-importance, it refuels it. The association between collective narcissism and intergroup hostility is weakened by experiences that fortify emotional resilience (e.g., positive identification with a community).

scholarly journals Democracy Justifies the Means: Political Group Structure Moderates the Perceived Legitimacy of Intergroup Aggression

2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 1683-1695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan M. Falomir-Pichastor ◽  
Christian Staerklé ◽  
Marie-Aude Depuiset ◽  
Fabrizio Butera
Keyword(s):  
Group Structure ◽  
Intergroup Aggression ◽  
Political Group

scholarly journals Intergroup lethal gang attacks do not require fission-fusion dynamics to evolve

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Martínez-Íñigo ◽  
Antje Engelhardt ◽  
Muhammad Agil ◽  
Malgorzata Pilot ◽  
Bonaventura Majolo
Keyword(s):  
Pan Troglodytes ◽  
Canis Lupus ◽  
Current Theory ◽  
Crocuta Crocuta ◽  
Variable Size ◽  
Intergroup Aggression ◽  
Macaca Nigra ◽  
Proximate Causes ◽  
Forms Of Violence ◽  
New Hypothesis

ABSTRACTLethal gang attacks, in which multiple aggressors attack a single victim, are among the most widespread forms of violence between human groups. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), as well as wolves (Canis lupus), spotted hyaenas (Crocuta crocuta), and lions (Panthera leo), perform gang attacks during raids. In raids, a few individuals of a group enter another group’s territory and attack its members if found in numerical disadvantage. Current theory predicts that raids and gang attacks are linked to fission-fusion dynamics, i.e., the capacity of a group to split into smaller subgroups of variable size and composition. However, over the last decade, research on social mammals without fission-fusion societies nor raiding have shown that they may also be involved in intergroup lethal gang attacks. Thus, neither fission-fusion dynamics nor raiding are required for gang attacks to evolve. Based on our first-ever reports of intergroup gang attacks in the crested macaque (Macaca nigra), combined with the synthesis of earlier observations of such attacks in several species living in stable groups, we develop a new hypothesis about the proximate causes leading to lethal intergroup aggression. We propose that the ability to estimate numerical odds, form coalitionary bonds, and show hostility towards outgroup individuals may suffice to trigger intergroup gang attacks when the conditions favour an imbalance of power between victims and attackers.

Nonverbal Evidence of Displaced Intergroup Aggression

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia McCord ◽  
Tanya Rodgers ◽  
Lela Strong ◽  
Carrie Anderson ◽  
Eric Vanman
Keyword(s):  
Intergroup Aggression
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document