The U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

2007 ◽  
pp. 185-197
Author(s):  
Paul A. Gade ◽  
Jonathan D. Kaplan ◽  
Nicole M. Dudley
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Army Research Institute ◽  
The U.S ◽  
Research Institute

Manprint Methods Development

1987 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 621-624
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Kaplan
Keyword(s):  
Methods Development ◽  
Army Research Institute ◽  
The U.S ◽  
Research Institute

The U.S. Army Research Institute (ARI) currently is engaged in the development of a suite of MANPRINT aiding methods. This paper will describe: the rationale behind the overall development and each method, the probable output of methods, and the analyses that follow from these methods.

Military Research on Performance Criteria: A Change of Emphasis

1980 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Uhlaner ◽  
Arthur J. Drucker
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Performance Measures ◽  
Systems Analysis ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Performance Tests ◽  
Complex Needs ◽  
Military Research ◽  
Army Research Institute ◽  
Unit Effectiveness ◽  
The U.S

This paper discusses trends in development and use of performance measures to meet complex needs of the U.S. Army. Examples from the programs of the Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences include typical major criteria of individual effectiveness (school grades, ratings, performance tests); measures of unit effectiveness more recently developed (tactical engagement simulation); and measures dealing with human factors problems encountered in systems analysis in the Army. The way in which performance criteria have changed over the years is emphasized.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document