Top-Down Problem Solving: The Compstat Paradigm.

Author(s):  
Hans Toch ◽  
J. Douglas Grant
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 162-178
Author(s):  
Cynthia Rayner ◽  
François Bonnici

This book asks a rather simple but bold question: “How do organizations create systemic social change?” This question is growing in importance, becoming part of the strategic conversation for all types of organizations, not just those specifically focused on social change. Business leaders, politicians, educators, employees, and parents are grappling with the realization that complex social change can rapidly impact their everyday lives. As frustration at the slow pace of change grows, and the world’s wicked problems—such as inequality, climate change and racial justice—proliferate, people are increasingly recognizing that we need to find ways to tackle the root causes of these issues rather than just addressing the symptoms. In the face of these challenges, it is easy to default to our more traditional views of leadership and problem-solving, which celebrate an us-versus-them mentality, top-down decision-making, and aggressive power stances. Systems work—with its focus on the process of change including our day-to-day actions and relationships—may feel counterintuitive in this rapidly emerging future. Yet, as the authors’ research has shown, the future is demanding a different kind of leadership, one that emphasizes the ways we work as much as the outcomes we pursue.


1994 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven M. Gerson ◽  
Sharon J. Gerson

How can Technical Writing teachers better prepare students for their careers? Corporations suggest that they want employees who can work together on teams, solve problems, and communicate. This requirement is due to the changing nature of business which is no longer industrial, employing a top-down managerial hierarchy. Today's businesses focus on information and employ a horizontal management which leans heavily on the employee who works in inter-organizational teams. First, we show our students how writing is a problem-solving activity. Next, we emphasize this point by assigning numerous short and long team projects which require problem solving and communication.


2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley C. Karkkainen

This article examines a mode of hybrid governance in which sovereign states and nonstate parties collaborate as equal partners to address complex problems that are beyond the problem-solving capacities of states acting alone. Under conventional state-centric approaches, environmental policy is the exclusive province of territorially delimited sovereign states, subject only to such obligations as states incur through voluntary inter-sovereign agreements. In contrast, “post-sovereign” governance is non-exclusive, non-hierarchical, and post-territorial. These arrangements emerge from recognition of the limitations of top-down domestic regulation and rules of inter-sovereign obligation as means to address such complex environmental problems as ecosystem management. Examples are drawn from the US experience in the Chesapeake Bay region, and the joint US-Canadian Great Lakes ecosystem management effort.


Author(s):  
Eero Hyvönen

AbstractSpreadsheets are difficult to use in applications, where only incomplete or inexact data (e.g., intervals) are available-a typical situation in various design and planning tasks. It can be argued that this is due to two fundamental shortcomings of the computational paradigm underlying spreadsheets. First, the distinction between input and output cells has to be fixed before computations. Second, cells may have only exact values. As a result, spread-sheets support the user only with primitive iterative problem solving schemes based on trial-and-error methods. A constraint-based computational paradigm for next generation interval spreadsheets is presented. The scheme makes it possible to exploit incomplete/inexact data (intervals), and it can support problem solving in a top-down fashion. Current spreadsheets constitute a special case of the more general interval constraint spreadsheets proposed.


1998 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl Missiuna ◽  
Theresa Malloy-Miller ◽  
Angela Mandich

For a variety of reasons, occupational therapists are beginning to explore the use of cognitive, or “top-down” approaches during intervention. While these approaches have a long history within education and psychology, the steps involved in problem-solving and the techniques that are used to mediate a child's occupational performance are unfamiliar to most therapists. In this paper, the historical underpinnings of cognitive approaches and mediational techniques are reviewed and the steps involved in teaching a child to problem solve are outlined. As each is described from the literature, it is interpreted and applied to paediatric occupational therapy practice. Finally, the problem-solving steps and techniques are combined to demonstrate usage of a cognitive approach in order to address a common occupational performance issue in childhood.


Author(s):  
Aideen J. Stronge ◽  
Wendy A. Rogers ◽  
Arthur D. Fisk

The present study investigated the Web-based problem solving strategies of 16 younger and 16 older experienced Web users. Participants searched for answers to 8 search tasks varying in complexity. Three questions were addressed in this study: (1) Are there age-related differences in success?, (2) If differences in success emerge, are these age-related differences quantitative (e.g., number of strategies)?, or (3) Are these age-related differences qualitative (e.g., type of strategies)?. Overall, younger adults were more successful finding the correct answer to the search tasks. However, this was not due to the number of strategies used, but instead was related to the type of strategy used. Older adults were more likely to use a top-down strategy (i.e., system tool) to find an answer to the search tasks. In general, unsuccessful searchers used significantly more top-down strategies than successful searchers. The implications for these findings are discussed.


Author(s):  
Jeffrey Kim ◽  
Elan Lee ◽  
Timothy Thomas ◽  
Caroline Dombrowski

New media allows previously passive consumers to tell and shape stories together. Yet most information is still disseminated in a top-down fashion, without taking advantage of the features enabled by new media. This paper presents five Alternate Reality Game (ARG) case studies which reveal common features and mechanisms used to attract and retain diverse players, to create task-focused communities and to solve problems collectively. Voluntary, collective problem solving is an intriguing phenomenon wherein disparate individuals work together asynchronously to solve problems together. ARGs also take advantage of the unique features of new media to craft stories that could not be told using other media.


Author(s):  
Thomas Packard

Staff-initiated organizational change is a series of activities carried out by lower or middle-level staff to improve organizational conditions, policy, program, or procedures for the ultimate improvement of service to clients. It has similarities with the more top-down approach to change covered in Section 3; both approaches are intended to improve the functioning of the organization, and both use some of the same processes, such as problem analysis and problem solving. Staff-initiated organizational change is different in that it is initiated by staff at lower levels. Steps include assessment, preinitiation (change agents assessing and developing their influence and social capital and inducing or augmenting stress so that the problem will be addressed), initiation, implementation, institutionalization, and evaluation. This approach may present some risk for lower level staff, depending on the leadership styles and philosophies of managers and the overall culture of the organization. If proper conditions exist, improvements in organizational operations are possible.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronghui Yang ◽  
Klasien Horstman ◽  
Bart Penders

This paper critically engages with dynamics of the Chinese food safety governance infrastructure following the melamine crisis. It presents a qualitative analysis of sixteen in-depth stakeholder interviews in Hunan, Hubei and Henan. We reveal tensions between a segmented model of governance and a centralised model, between a centralised top-down model and stakeholder participation, and between a public model and a private, decentral market where corporate reputation must result in transparency and trust. Stakeholders also see gaps between ideals of inclusive, transparent and participatory governance, and effective problem-solving. Governance of food safety in China, even when targeting inclusion and public accountability, remains heavily dependent on the central state as a pivotal actor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document