Reinforcement and coercion mechanisms in the development of antisocial behavior: The family.

Author(s):  
James Snyder ◽  
Mark Stoolmiller
2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanghag Kim ◽  
Grazyna Kochanska ◽  
Lea J. Boldt ◽  
Jamie Koenig Nordling ◽  
Jessica J. O'Bleness

AbstractParent–child relationships are critical in development, but much remains to be learned about the mechanisms of their impact. We examined the early parent–child relationship as a moderator of the developmental trajectory from children's affective and behavioral responses to transgressions to future antisocial, externalizing behavior problems in the Family Study (102 community mothers, fathers, and infants, followed through age 8) and the Play Study (186 low-income, diverse mothers and toddlers, followed for 10 months). The relationship quality was indexed by attachment security in the Family Study and maternal responsiveness in the Play Study. Responses to transgressions (tense discomfort and reparation) were observed in laboratory mishaps wherein children believed they had damaged a valued object. Antisocial outcomes were rated by parents. In both studies, early relationships moderated the future developmental trajectory: diminished tense discomfort predicted more antisocial outcomes, but only in insecure or unresponsive relationships. That risk was defused in secure or responsive relationships. Moderated mediation analyses in the Family Study indicated that the links between diminished tense discomfort and future antisocial behavior in insecure parent–child dyads were mediated by stronger discipline pressure from parents. By indirectly influencing future developmental sequelae, early relationships may increase or decrease the probability that the parent–child dyad will embark on a path toward antisocial outcomes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory M. Fosco ◽  
Mark Van Ryzin ◽  
Elizabeth A. Stormshak ◽  
Thomas J. Dishion

AbstractThis study examined contextual factors (caregiver depression, family resources, ethnicity, and initial levels of youth problem behavior) related to the effectiveness of the Family Check-Up (FCU) and evaluated family processes as a mediator of FCU intervention response and adolescent antisocial behavior. We followed a sample of 180 ethnically diverse youths of families who engaged in the FCU intervention. Family data were collected as part of the FCU assessment, and youth data were collected over 4 years, from sixth through ninth grade. Findings indicated that caregiver depression and minority status predicted greater caregiver motivation to change. In turn, caregiver motivation was the only direct predictor of FCU intervention response during a 1-year period. Growth in family conflict from sixth through eighth grade mediated the link between FCU response and ninth-grade antisocial behavior. This study explicitly tested core aspects of the FCU intervention model and demonstrated that caregiver motivation is a central factor that underlies family response to the FCU. The study also provided support for continued examination of family process mechanisms that account for enduring effects of the FCU and other family-centered interventions.


2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1187-1197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt DeLisi ◽  
Kevin M. Beaver ◽  
Michael G. Vaughn ◽  
John Paul Wright

A range of Gene × Environment interactions is associated with antisocial phenotypes, and the evidence is clear that the etiology of antisocial behavior is strongly heritable and that environmental liabilities are important. However, the precise ways that genetic and environmental pathogens interact to predict antisocial behavior are underspecified. The present study shows that the interaction between a polymorphism in a dopamine receptor gene (DRD2) and a criminal father predicts five antisocial phenotypes among African American females ( n = 232) in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Genetic risk (as measured by the A1 allele) and a criminal father interacted to predict serious and violent delinquency at Wave 1, serious and violent delinquency at Wave 2, and number of police contacts. The current investigation represents the first study to show Gene × Environment interactions in the prediction of antisocial phenotypes using criminal justice system status as an environmental pathogen.


1993 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 483-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Rodríguez

We investigated the family history of alcoholism as a potential contributor to cognitive dysfunction in polydrug abusers. A sample of 62 male polydrug users whose main drug of use was heroin included no one with which comorbid antisocial behavior varied by family history of alcoholism. They were compared on a battery of cognitive tests. Polydrug users with positive histories tended to perform worse on several cognitive measures than those with negative family histories, but these tendencies were not statistically significant. The current findings support the hypothesis that cognitive deficiencies observed in previous studies of persons with positive family histories of alcoholism may, in part, be attributable to a failure to exclude individuals with diagnoses of antisocial behavior.


Author(s):  
Brigite Micaela Henriques

Resumo.Os laços afectivos entre as crianças e os pais são considerados bastante relevantes para o desenvolvimento do comportamento pró-social e antissocial. Apesar das mudanças sociais, a família tem sido considerada como um factor decisivo no desenvolvimento de comportamentos disruptivos. A investigação tem procurado compreender se a qualidade da vinculação estabelecida com as figuras de vinculação está ou não associada a futuros comportamentos disruptivos das crianças. Este artigo assenta na revisão da literatura, cujo objectivo consiste sintetizar alguns dos estudos realizados, para a compreensão e explicação da relação entre a vinculação e os problemas de comportamento da criança.Palavras-chave: vinculação; comportamento antissocial.Abstract.The parent-child attachment is considered highly relevant to the development of prosocial and antisocial behavior. Even though the social changes, the family has been considered as a decisive factor in the development of disruptive behaviors. Research has sought to understand if the quality of the attachment established with the attachment figures (usually the parents) is or isn’t associated with future disruptive behaviour disorders in children. This article is a literature review, whose main purpose is to synthesize some of the studies, to understanding and explaining the relationship between attachment and behavior disorders in children.Keywords: attachment; antisocial behavior.


1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Ramsey ◽  
Hill M. Walker

This study examined the family management practices of parents of antisocial and non-antisocial boys. Serving as subjects for the study were 80 fourth-grade boys and their families involved in an extensive longitudinal investigation. Parent management practices including discipline, monitoring, positive reinforcement, involvement, and problem solving were compared. The two groups also were compared across a number of family status variables. Study results indicated between-group differences also were obtained for the status variables associated with adult relationship(s) in the home and father criminal record. Study outcomes are discussed in terms of parent and family contributions to antisocial behavior.


1992 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 468-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Marquis

Many studies have indicated a positive correlation between family dysfunction and subsequent cognitive and behavioral problems in offspring. The purpose of this study was to compare the family histories of 118 inmates with those of 45 college students and to document differential patterns. The possible social implications of the data are discussed as well as directions for further research.


Author(s):  
Dinara Babajanova ◽  

This article discusses the issues of parents who involve their minor children in such types of antisocial behavior as begging. The author analyzes the terminology, the reasons for the occurrence of such a negative phenomenon, the existing legislative norms which provide for administrative and criminal liability, the ineffectiveness of these norms in resolving the issue of punishing such parents. The author of the article comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to study each specific case of parents involving their children in begging and providing appropriate assistance to the family.


Author(s):  
Brigite Micaela Henriques

Abstract.The family, as a central role in the socialization of children and adolescents, has been considered a decisive factor in the development of juvenile delinquency. Since the end nineteenth century, the family and delinquent behavior has aroused the interest of specialists in humanities (education, psychology, psychiatry, social work, sociology, criminology). These professionals propose that the way to interact appropriately with significant adults and peer group is important for the development of child and adolescent. This article is a literature review, whose main purpose is to synthesize some of the studies, to understanding and explaining the factors that contribute to occurrence antisocial behavior in children and adolescent.Keywords: antisocial behavior; risk factors; protective factorsResumo.A família, como papel central na socialização das crianças e adolescentes, tem sido considerada um factor decisivo no desenvolvimento da delinquência juvenil. Desde o final do século XIX, a temática família e conduta delinquente tem despertado o interesse dos especialistas em ciências humanas (educação, psicologia, psiquiatria, serviço social, sociologia, criminologia). Estes profissionais indicam que a forma de interagir adequadamente com os adultos significativos e grupo de pares é relevante para o desenvolvimento da criança e do adolescente. Este artigo assenta na revisão da literatura, cujo objectivo consiste sintetizar alguns dos estudos realizados, para a compreensão e explicação dos factores que contribuem para a ocorrência de comportamento antissocial da criança e do adolescente.Palavras-chave: comportamento antissocial; factores de risco; factores de protecção


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izaskun Ibabe ◽  
Joana Jaureguizar ◽  
Peter M. Bentler

AbstractBoth the family and school environments influence adolescents’ violence, but there is little research focusing simultaneously on the two contexts. This study analyzed the role of positive family and classroom environments as protective factors for adolescents’ violence against authority (parent abuse and teacher abuse) and the relations between antisocial behavior and child-to-parent violence or student-to-teacher violence. The sample comprised 687 Spanish students aged 12-16 years, who responded to the Family Environment Scale (FES) and the Classroom Environment Scale (CES). Structural Equation Modeling was used to test our model of violent behavior towards authority based on Catalano and Hawkins’ Social Developmental Model (1996). Perceived family cohesion and organization showed an inverse association with parent abuse, suggesting that a positive family environment was a protective factor for the development of violence against parents. Family and classroom environments had direct effects on adolescents’ violence against authority, and antisocial behavior showed a mediating effect in this relationship. The model accounted for 81% of the variance in violence against authority. As family environment was a better predictor of violence against authority than school environment, intervention efforts to reduce rates of adolescent violence should focus on helping parents to increase family cohesion and to manage conflictive relationships with their children.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document