Faculty Evaluation: A Superficial View

1986 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 898-899
Author(s):  
Steven Kerr ◽  
Charles Maxey
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Evaluation

The role of the department chairman in faculty evaluation

1977 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 324-328
Author(s):  
CL Keith ◽  
SA Weiss ◽  
AL Leo
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Evaluation ◽  
Department Chairman

Exploring E-Governance of Faculty Evaluation System

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 36-47
Author(s):  
Naim Shaikh ◽  
Sneha Kumari ◽  
Kishori Kasat
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Model ◽  
Education System ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Faculty Evaluation ◽  
Binary Interaction ◽  
Interaction Matrix ◽  
Interpretive Structural Modeling ◽  
Employment System ◽  
Modern Technique ◽  
Efficient Performance

Traditional methods of teaching have created several gaps in the Faculty Evaluation System. E-Governance of Faculty Evaluation System is a modern technique which leads to an efficient performance of the education system. Driven by the need for transparency in the system, the aim of this article is to propose a model for an efficient E-Governance of the Faculty Evaluation. The authors have conducted a qualitative study to build up a theoretical model for E-Governance of Faculty Evaluation System. Nineteen enablers are identified from the literature and model has been developed through Total Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach (TISM). The VAXO model, Reachability matrix, binary interaction matrix and transitive links have been explained in the article. The research has developed a model for the Faculty Evaluation System. This is an important concept and is in need at the present hour. This concept could bring equality in faculty employment system and impart quality knowledge to the Education System. This concept can create a novelty in the education system.

Undergraduate performance assessment

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Umayya Musharrafieh ◽  
Khalil Ashkar ◽  
Dima Dandashi ◽  
Maya Romani ◽  
Rana Houry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Faculty Evaluation ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Final Exam ◽  
Monthly Basis ◽  
Medicine Clerkship ◽  
Clinical Evaluations

Introduction: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is considered a useful method of assessing clinical skills besides Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) and clinical evaluations. Aim: To explore the acceptance of medical students to this assessment tool in medical education and to determine whether the assessment results of MCQs and faculty clinical evaluations agree with the respective OSCE scores of 4th year medical students (Med IV). Methods: performance of a total of 223 Med IV students distributed on academic years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, and 2008-2009 in OSCE, MCQs and faculty evaluations were compared. Out of the total 93 students were asked randomly to fill a questionnaire about their attitudes and acceptance of this tool. The OSCE was conducted every two months for two different groups of medical students who had completed their family medicine rotation, while faculty evaluation based on observation by assessors was submitted on a monthly basis upon the completion of the rotation. The final exam for the family medicine clerkship was performed at the end of the 4thacademic year, and it consisted of MCQsResults: Students highly commended the OSCE as a tool of evaluation by faculty members as it provides a true measure of required clinical skills and communication skills compared to MCQs and faculty evaluation. The study showed a significant positive correlation between the OSCE scores and the clinical evaluation scores while there was no association between the OSCE score and the final exam scores.Conclusion: Student showed high appreciation and acceptance of this type of clinical skills testing. Despite the fact that OSCEs make them more stressed than other modalities of assessment, it remained the preferred one.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document