One Rosetta Stone and Numerous Illusions

1980 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 407-408
Author(s):  
ROY LACHMAN ◽  
JANET L. LACHMAN
Keyword(s):  
Rosetta Stone

Coda: The Rosetta Stone

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Schotter
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
New Media ◽  
Digital Media ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Digital Code ◽  
Media Technologies ◽  
Rosetta Stone ◽  
The World ◽  
Western Imagination ◽  
Origin Point

Hieroglyphs have persisted for so long in the Western imagination because of the malleability of their metaphorical meanings. Emblems of readability and unreadability, universality and difference, writing and film, writing and digital media, hieroglyphs serve to encompass many of the central tensions in understandings of race, nation, language and media in the twentieth century. For Pound and Lindsay, they served as inspirations for a more direct and universal form of writing; for Woolf, as a way of treating the new medium of film and our perceptions of the world as a kind of language. For Conrad and Welles, they embodied the hybridity of writing or the images of film; for al-Hakim and Mahfouz, the persistence of links between ancient Pharaonic civilisation and a newly independent Egypt. For Joyce, hieroglyphs symbolised the origin point for the world’s cultures and nations; for Pynchon, the connection between digital code and the novel. In their modernist interpretations and applications, hieroglyphs bring together writing and new media technologies, language and the material world, and all the nations and languages of the globe....

Discovering a Rosetta Stone for Firm-Side Authenticity: An Empirical Investigation

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Parkman ◽  
Samuel Holloway
Keyword(s):  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Empirical Investigation ◽  
Identity Management ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Corporate Identity ◽  
Organizational Contexts ◽  
Rosetta Stone ◽  
Innovation Capacity ◽  
Resources And Capabilities ◽  
Four Quadrant

While most academic research has considered authenticity from the consumers perspective, this paper proposes and tests a new empirical operationalization of Beverlands (2005) widely cited proposition that firm-side authenticity is…partly true and partly rhetorical (p.1008). Our study presents a model based on the Competitive Advantage (CA) that results from congruence between the partly true aspects of the firms internal culture, resources, and capabilities measured as Innovation Capacity (IC), alongside Corporate Identity Management (CIM) as the organizations partly rhetorical outwardly-directed corporate branding and marketing promotions activities. Our findings are interpreted through a four-quadrant Rosetta Stone framework for evaluating firm-side authenticity across organizational contexts and environments describing how high-IC/high-CIM (i.e., Authentic) firms create differentiation from low-IC/low-CIM Inauthentic organizations and low-IC/high-CIM Faux Imitators competitors who attempt to compensate for their lack of IC through increased investments in CIM.

History of Recording Demotic Epigraphy

2020 ◽  
pp. 491-507
Author(s):  
Jan Moje
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
Seventh Century ◽  
First Century ◽  
Third Century ◽  
Late Period ◽  
Greco Roman ◽  
Rosetta Stone ◽  
Roman Egypt ◽  
History Of ◽  
Twenty First Century

This chapter gives an overview of the history of recording and publishing epigraphic sources in Demotic language and script from the Late Period to Greco-Roman Egypt (seventh century bce to third century ce), for example, on stelae, offering tables, coffins, or votive gifts. The history of editing such texts and objects spans over two hundred years. Here, the important steps and pioneering publications on Demotic epigraphy are examined. They start from the beginning of the nineteenth century, when Napoleon’s expedition to Egypt found the Rosetta stone, until the twenty-first century.

A plea to Fuller for a Rosetta Stone

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 241-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gonzalo Munévar
Keyword(s):  
Rosetta Stone

Some Bits of Horns from Folkestone

The Geologist ◽  
1861 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 465-467
Keyword(s):  
British Museum ◽  
Basal Part ◽  
The Past ◽  
Rosetta Stone ◽  
History Of ◽  
Commercial Value ◽  
Future Thought

Old bones, that would be worthless to anybody else, become valuable to the geologist. There may be nothing picturesque or strikingly singular in their appearance. They may be too rotten or too fragile for the manufacturer; too sapless for the agriculturist; nay, too few or too far between to be of any commercial value at all. And yet bits of bones may be inscriptions of much value to the palæontologist. As every letter in the few lines incised on the famous Rosetta stone was a key to some passage in a forgotten language of the past, so every new bit of bone may be the key to some passage in that greater history of a greater past which geology unrolls. Many years ago—how time flies past—I met with a little patch of mammaliferous drift at Folkestone; I gathered every fragment of bone, every tooth, every shell, which the workmen's picks and spades exhumed, and most of what I could not determine myself at that time, Professor Owen, and my then living and active friend, Mr. Turner, looked over and named.Amongst the bones I then collected were two of form to me before unknown, and which I often since brought back to mind. Two—both fragments of horns—flat at the basal part, perfectly round towards the tip; no goat, nor antelope, nor deer, that I knew, had horns like them; and so those fragments were laid aside (not carelessly) for future thought and comparison. Shortly since in walking through the gallery of the British Museum, I visited the cases containing deers' remains, and there, at once I saw, not the counterparts, but what seemed to me the fac-similes of my bits of horns.

scholarly journals OJ287: Deciphering the “Rosetta stone of blazars★”

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Britzen ◽  
C Fendt ◽  
G Witzel ◽  
S -J Qian ◽  
I N Pashchenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rosetta Stone

PROsetta: An R Package for Linking Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

2021 ◽  
pp. 014662162110131
Author(s):  
S. W. Choi ◽  
S. Lim ◽  
B. D. Schalet ◽  
A. J. Kaat ◽  
D. Cella
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
R Package ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Short History ◽  
Rosetta Stone ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
R Packages ◽  
Measurement Information System

A common problem when using a variety of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for diverse populations and subgroups is establishing a harmonized scale for the incommensurate outcomes. The lack of comparability in metrics (e.g., raw summed scores vs. scaled scores) among different PROs poses practical challenges in studies comparing effects across studies and samples. Linking has long been used for practical benefit in educational testing. Applying various linking techniques to PRO data has a relatively short history; however, in recent years, there has been a surge of published studies on linking PROs and other health outcomes, owing in part to concerted efforts such as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) project and the PRO Rosetta Stone (PROsetta Stone®) project ( www.prosettastone.org ). Many R packages have been developed for linking in educational settings; however, they are not tailored for linking PROs where harmonization of data across clinical studies or settings serves as the main objective. We created the PROsetta package to fill this gap and disseminate a protocol that has been established as a standard practice for linking PROs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document