The sea ice thickness distribution in the northwestern Weddell Sea

1991 ◽  
Vol 96 (C3) ◽  
pp. 4821 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Lange ◽  
H. Eicken
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Thickness Distribution ◽  
Weddell Sea ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness

scholarly journals Evaluation of Sea-Ice Thickness from four reanalyses in the Antarctic Weddell Sea

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Shi ◽  
Qinghua Yang ◽  
Longjiang Mu ◽  
Jinfei Wang ◽  
François Massonnet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Thickness Distribution ◽  
Weddell Sea ◽  
Ocean Modeling ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
First Year ◽  
Coupled Models ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
The Antarctic

Abstract. Ocean-sea ice coupled models constrained by varied observations provide different ice thickness estimates in the Antarctic. We evaluate contemporary monthly ice thickness from four reanalyses in the Weddell Sea, the German contribution of the Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean project, Version 2 (GECCO2), the Southern Ocean State Estimate (SOSE), the Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean (NEMO) based ocean-ice model (called NEMO-EnKF), and the Global Ice-Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (GIOMAS), and with reference observations from ICESat-1, Envisat, upward looking sonars and visual ship-based sea-ice observations. Compared with ICESat-1 altimetry and in situ observations, all reanalyses underestimate ice thickness near the coast of the western Weddell Sea, even though ICESat-1 and visual observations may be biased low. GECCO2 and NEMO-EnKF can well reproduce the seasonal variation of first-year ice thickness in the eastern Weddell Sea. In contrast, GIOMAS ice thickness performs best in the central Weddell Sea, while SOSE ice thickness agrees most with the observations in the southern coast of the Weddell Sea. In addition, only NEMO-EnKF can reproduce the seasonal spatial evolution of ice thickness distribution well, characterized by the thick ice shifting from the southwestern and western Weddell Sea in summer to the western and northwestern Weddell Sea in spring. We infer that the thick ice distribution is correlated with its better simulation of northward ice motion in the western Weddell Sea. These results demonstrate the possibilities and limitations of using current sea-ice reanalysis for understanding the recent variability of sea-ice volume in the Antarctic.

scholarly journals A Textural Approach to Improving Snow Depth Estimates in the Weddell Sea

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1494
Author(s):  
M. Jeffrey Mei ◽  
Ted Maksym
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Thickness Distribution ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Weddell Sea ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Snow Surface ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Antarctic Sea Ice

The snow depth on Antarctic sea ice is critical to estimating the sea ice thickness distribution from laser altimetry data, such as from Operation IceBridge or ICESat-2. Snow redistributed by wind collects around areas of deformed ice and forms a wide variety of features on sea ice; the morphology of these features may provide some indication of the mean snow depth. Here, we apply a textural segmentation algorithm to classify and group similar textures to infer the distribution of snow using snow surface freeboard measurements from Operation IceBridge campaigns over the Weddell Sea. We find that texturally-similar regions have similar snow/ice ratios, even when they have different absolute snow depth measurements. This allows for the extrapolation of nadir-looking snow radar data using two-dimensional surface altimetry scans, providing a two-dimensional estimate of the snow depth with ∼22% error. We show that at the floe scale (∼180 m), snow depth can be directly estimated from the snow surface with ∼20% error using deep learning techniques, and that the learned filters are comparable to standard textural analysis techniques. This error drops to ∼14% when averaged over 1.5 km scales. These results suggest that surface morphological information can improve remotely-sensed estimates of snow depth, and hence sea ice thickness, as compared to current methods. Such methods may be useful for reducing uncertainty in Antarctic sea ice thickness estimates from ICESat-2.

scholarly journals Interannual sea ice thickness variability in the Bay of Bothnia

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3459-3476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iina Ronkainen ◽  
Jonni Lehtiranta ◽  
Mikko Lensu ◽  
Eero Rinne ◽  
Jari Haapala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Interannual Variability ◽  
Thickness Distribution ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Thickness Variability ◽  
Fast Ice ◽  
Ridged Ice

Abstract. While variations of Baltic Sea ice extent and thickness have been extensively studied, there is little information about drift ice thickness, distribution, and its variability. In our study, we quantify the interannual variability of sea ice thickness in the Bay of Bothnia during the years 2003–2016. We use various different data sets: official ice charts, drilling data from the regular monitoring stations in the coastal fast ice zone, and helicopter and shipborne electromagnetic soundings. We analyze the different data sets and compare them to each other to characterize the interannual variability, to discuss the ratio of level and deformed ice, and to derive ice thickness distributions in the drift ice zone. In the fast ice zone the average ice thickness is 0.58±0.13 m. Deformed ice increases the variability of ice conditions in the drift ice zone, where the average ice thickness is 0.92±0.33 m. On average, the fraction of deformed ice is 50 % to 70 % of the total volume. In heavily ridged ice regions near the coast, mean ice thickness is approximately half a meter thicker than that of pure thermodynamically grown fast ice. Drift ice exhibits larger interannual variability than fast ice.

scholarly journals New insight from CryoSat-2 sea ice thickness for sea ice modelling

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Schröder ◽  
Danny L. Feltham ◽  
Michel Tsamados ◽  
Andy Ridout ◽  
Rachel Tilling
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Thickness Distribution ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Atmospheric Conditions ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Ice Growth ◽  
Melt Pond ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Estimates of Arctic sea ice thickness are available from the CryoSat-2 (CS2) radar altimetry mission during ice growth seasons since 2010. We derive the sub-grid scale ice thickness distribution (ITD) with respect to 5 ice thickness categories used in a sea ice component (CICE) of climate simulations. This allows us to initialize the ITD in stand-alone simulations with CICE and to verify the simulated cycle of ice thickness. We find that a default CICE simulation strongly underestimates ice thickness, despite reproducing the inter-annual variability of summer sea ice extent. We can identify the underestimation of winter ice growth as being responsible and show that increasing the ice conductive flux for lower temperatures (bubbly brine scheme) and accounting for the loss of drifting snow results in the simulated sea ice growth being more realistic. Sensitivity studies provide insight into the impact of initial and atmospheric conditions and, thus, on the role of positive and negative feedback processes. During summer, atmospheric conditions are responsible for 50 % of September sea ice thickness variability through the positive sea ice and melt pond albedo feedback. However, atmospheric winter conditions have little impact on winter ice growth due to the dominating negative conductive feedback process: the thinner the ice and snow in autumn, the stronger the ice growth in winter. We conclude that the fate of Arctic summer sea ice is largely controlled by atmospheric conditions during the melting season rather than by winter temperature. Our optimal model configuration does not only improve the simulated sea ice thickness, but also summer sea ice concentration, melt pond fraction, and length of the melt season. It is the first time CS2 sea ice thickness data have been applied successfully to improve sea ice model physics.

scholarly journals ICESat observations of seasonal and interannual variations of sea-ice freeboard and estimated thickness in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica (2003–2009)

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (57) ◽  
pp. 43-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donghui Yi ◽  
H. Jay Zwally ◽  
John W. Robbins
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Weddell Sea ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Earth Observing System ◽  
Pack Ice ◽  
Snow Water ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Seasonal And Interannual Variations

AbstractSea-ice freeboard heights for 17 ICESat campaign periods from 2003 to 2009 are derived from ICESat data. Freeboard is combined with snow depth from Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) data and nominal densities of snow, water and sea ice, to estimate sea-ice thickness. Sea-ice freeboard and thickness distributions show clear seasonal variations that reflect the yearly cycle of growth and decay of the Weddell Sea (Antarctica) pack ice. During October–November, sea ice grows to its seasonal maximum both in area and thickness; the mean freeboards are 0.33–0.41m and the mean thicknesses are 2.10–2.59 m. During February–March, thinner sea ice melts away and the sea-ice pack is mainly distributed in the west Weddell Sea; the mean freeboards are 0.35–0.46m and the mean thicknesses are 1.48–1.94 m. During May–June, the mean freeboards and thicknesses are 0.26–0.29m and 1.32–1.37 m, respectively. the 6 year trends in sea-ice extent and volume are (0.023±0.051)×106 km2 a–1 (0.45% a–1) and (0.007±0.092)×103 km3 a–1 (0.08% a–1); however, the large standard deviations indicate that these positive trends are not statistically significant.

Sea ice deformation and thickness in the Western Ross Sea

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Rack ◽  
Daniel Price ◽  
Christian Haas ◽  
Patricia J. Langhorne ◽  
Greg H. Leonard
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Satellite Images ◽  
Ross Sea ◽  
Thickness Distribution ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Ice Dynamics ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Ice Volume ◽  
Terra Nova Bay ◽  
Western Ross Sea

<p>Sea ice cover is arguably the longest and best observed climate variable from space, with over four decades of highly reliable daily records of extent in both hemispheres. In Antarctica, a slight positive decadal trend in sea ice cover is driven by changes in the western Ross Sea, where a variation in weather patterns over the wider region forced a change in meridional winds. The distinguishing wind driven sea ice process in the western Ross Sea is the regular occurrence of the Ross Sea, McMurdo Sound, and Terra Nova Bay polynyas. Trends in sea ice volume and mass in this area unknown, because ice thickness and dynamics are particularly hard to measure.</p><p>Here we present the first comprehensive and direct assessment of large-scale sea-ice thickness distribution in the western Ross Sea. Using an airborne electromagnetic induction (AEM) ice thickness sensor towed by a fixed wing aircraft (Basler BT-67), we observed in November 2017 over a distance of 800 km significantly thicker ice than expected from thermodynamic growth alone. By means of time series of satellite images and wind data we relate the observed thickness distribution to satellite derived ice dynamics and wind data. Strong southerly winds with speeds of up to 25 ms<sup>-1</sup> in early October deformed the pack ice, which was surveyed more than a month later.</p><p>We found strongly deformed ice with a mean and maximum thickness of 2.0 and 15.6 m, respectively. Sea-ice thickness gradients are highest within 100-200 km of polynyas, where the mean thickness of the thickest 10% of ice is 7.6 m. From comparison with aerial photographs and satellite images we conclude that ice preferentially grows in deformational ridges; about 43% of the sea ice volume in the area between McMurdo Sound and Terra Nova Bay is concentrated in more than 3 m thick ridges which cover about 15% of the surveyed area. Overall, 80% of the ice was found to be heavily deformed and concentrated in ridges up to 11.8 m thick.</p><p>Our observations hold a link between wind driven ice dynamics and the ice mass exported from the western Ross Sea. The sea ice statistics highlighted in this contribution forms a basis for improved satellite derived mass balance assessments and the evaluation of sea ice simulations.</p>

Estimating the thickness of ridged sea ice from ship observations in the Ross Sea

2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
TINA TIN ◽  
MARTIN O. JEFFRIES ◽  
MIKKO LENSU ◽  
JUKKA TUHKURI
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Ross Sea ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Thickness Distribution ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Equivalent Thickness ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Antarctic Sea Ice ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Original Formula

Ship-based observations of sea ice thickness using the Antarctic Sea Ice Processes and Climate (ASPeCt) protocol provide information on ice thickness distribution at relatively low cost. This protocol uses a simple formula to calculate the mass of ice in ridges based on surface observations. We present two new formulae and compare these with results from the “Original” formula using data obtained in the Ross Sea in autumn and winter. The new “r-star” formula uses a more realistic ratio of sail and keel areas to transform dimensions of sails to estimates of mean keel areas. As a result, estimates of “equivalent thickness” (i.e. mean thickness of ice in ridged areas) increased by over 200%. The new “Probability” formula goes one step further, by incorporating the probability that a sail is associated with a keel underwater, and the probability that keels may be found under level surfaces. This resulted in estimates of equivalent thickness comparable with the Original formula. Estimates of equivalent thickness at one or two degree latitude resolution are sufficiently accurate for validating sea ice models. Although ridges are small features in the Ross Sea, we have shown that they constitute a significant fraction of the total ice mass.

scholarly journals Seasonal development of the sea-ice thickness distribution in East Antarctica: measurements from upward-looking sonar

2001 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 177-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. Worby ◽  
G. M. Bush ◽  
I. Allison
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Thickness Distribution ◽  
East Antarctica ◽  
Seasonal Development ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Seasonal Evolution ◽  
Pack Ice ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Prototype Instrument

AbstractUpward-looking sonar (ULS) data are presented from a prototype instrument deployed at 63° 18’ S, 107°49’ E in 1994. These data show the seasonal evolution of the ice-draft distribution from May when predominantly thin ice is present, through October when substantially thicker ice has been formed by deformation. The mean ice draft reaches a maximum in August at 1.21 m, the same month in which ship-based observations from the same region show a peak in ice thickness. The observed distribution from ULS data is only for drafts > 0.3 m due to data losses caused by the low acoustic reflectivity of actively forming ice. The spring distributions show very little development of drafts > 3.0 m, and it is hypothesized that this is due to the cyclical nature of deformation in the East Antarctic pack-ice zone, and that periods of sustained pressure required to form very thick ice are uncommon in this region

scholarly journals A method for sea ice thickness and concentration analysis based on SAR data and a thermodynamic model

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1507-1526 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Karvonen ◽  
B. Cheng ◽  
T. Vihma ◽  
M. Arkett ◽  
T. Carrieres
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Thickness Distribution ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Motion Field ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Automated Method ◽  
Basin Scale ◽  
Sar Data

Abstract. An analysis of ice thickness distribution is a challenge, particularly in a seasonal sea ice zone with a strongly dynamic ice motion field, such as the Gulf of St. Lawrence off Canada. We present a novel automated method for ice concentration and thickness analysis combining modeling of sea ice thermodynamics and detection of ice motion on the basis of space-borne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data. Thermodynamic evolution of sea ice thickness in the Gulf of St. Lawrence was simulated for two winters, 2002–2003 and 2008–2009. The basin-scale ice thickness was controlled by atmospheric forcing, but the spatial distribution of ice thickness and concentration could not be explained by thermodynamics only. SAR data were applied to detect ice motion and ice surface structure during these two winters. The SAR analysis is based on estimation of ice motion between SAR image pairs and analysis of the local SAR texture statistics. Including SAR data analysis brought a significant added value to the results based on thermodynamics only. Our novel method combining the thermodynamic modeling and SAR yielded results that well match with the distribution of observations based on airborne Electromagnetic Induction (EM) method. Compared to the present operational method of producing ice charts for the Gulf of St. Lawrence, which is based on visual interpretation of SAR data, the new method reveals much more detailed and physically based information on spatial distribution of ice thickness. The algorithms can be run automatically, and the final products can then be used by ice analysts for operational ice service. The method is globally applicable to all seas where SAR data are available.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document