scholarly journals Robustness of CMIP6 Historical Global Mean Temperature Simulations: Trends, Long‐Term Persistence, Autocorrelation, and Distributional Shape

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Michael Papalexiou ◽  
Chandra Rupa Rajulapati ◽  
Martyn P. Clark ◽  
Flavio Lehner
Keyword(s):  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Global Mean

scholarly journals Estimates of Uncertainty in Predictions of Global Mean Surface Temperature

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 843-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Kettleborough ◽  
B. B. B. Booth ◽  
P. A. Stott ◽  
M. R. Allen
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Energy Balance ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Balance Model ◽  
Future Climate Change ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract A method for estimating uncertainty in future climate change is discussed in detail and applied to predictions of global mean temperature change. The method uses optimal fingerprinting to make estimates of uncertainty in model simulations of twentieth-century warming. These estimates are then projected forward in time using a linear, compact relationship between twentieth-century warming and twenty-first-century warming. This relationship is established from a large ensemble of energy balance models. By varying the energy balance model parameters an estimate is made of the error associated with using the linear relationship in forecasts of twentieth-century global mean temperature. Including this error has very little impact on the forecasts. There is a 50% chance that the global mean temperature change between 1995 and 2035 will be greater than 1.5 K for the Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) A1FI scenario. Under SRES B2 the same threshold is not exceeded until 2055. These results should be relatively robust to model developments for a given radiative forcing history.

scholarly journals Analytical solution for the effect of increasing CO2 on global mean temperature

Nature ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 316 (6029) ◽  
pp. 657-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. M. L. Wigley ◽  
M. E. Schlesinger
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Solution ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Global Mean

scholarly journals Variability of surface climate in simulations of past and future

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kira Rehfeld ◽  
Raphaël Hébert ◽  
Juan M. Lora ◽  
Marcus Lofverstrom ◽  
Chris M. Brierley
Keyword(s):  
Climate Variability ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Temperature Variability ◽  
Last Interglacial ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Extreme Precipitation Events ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Project Phases ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Global Mean

<p>It is virtually certain that the mean surface temperature of the Earth will continue to increase under realistic emission scenarios. Yet comparatively little is known about future changes in climate variability. We explore changes in climate variability over the large range of climates simulated in the framework the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 5 and 6 (CMIP5/6) and the Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project Phases 3 and 4 (PMIP3/4). <br>This consists of time slice simulations for the Pliocene, Last Interglacial, Last Glacial Maximum, the Mid Holocene and idealized warming experiments (1% CO<sub>2</sub> and abrupt 4xCO<sub>2</sub>), and encompasses climates with a range of 12°C of global mean temperature change. We examine climate variability from different perspectives: from local interannual change, to coherent climate modes and through compositing extremes. The change in the interannual variability of precipitation is strongly dependent upon the local change in the total amount of precipitation. Meanwhile only over tropical land is the change in the interannual temperature variability positively correlated to temperature change, and then weakly. In general, temperature variability is inversely related to mean temperature change - with analysis of power spectra demonstrating that this holds from intra-seasonal to multi-decadal timescales. We systematically investigate changes in the standard deviation of modes of climate variability. Overall, no generalisable pattern emerges. Several modes do show, sometimes weak, increasing variability with global mean temperature change (most notably the Atlantic Zonal Mode), but also the El Niño/Southern Oscillation indices (NINO3.4 and NINO4). The annular modes in the Northern (Southern) hemisphere show only weakly increasing (decreasing) relationships. <br>By compositing extreme precipitation events across the ensemble, we demonstrate that the atmospheric drivers dominating rainfall variability in Mediterranean climates persist throughout palaeoclimate and future simulations. The robust nature of the response of climate variability in model simulations, between both cold and warm climates and across multiple timescales, suggests that observations and proxy reconstructions could provide a meaningful constraint on climate variability in future projections.</p>

scholarly journals Pacific variability reconciles observed and modelled global mean temperature increase since 1950

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin B. Stolpe ◽  
Kevin Cowtan ◽  
Iselin Medhaug ◽  
Reto Knutti
Keyword(s):  
Global Warming ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Temperature Increase ◽  
Global Temperature ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Global Warming Hiatus ◽  
Warming Hiatus ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract Global mean temperature change simulated by climate models deviates from the observed temperature increase during decadal-scale periods in the past. In particular, warming during the ‘global warming hiatus’ in the early twenty-first century appears overestimated in CMIP5 and CMIP6 multi-model means. We examine the role of equatorial Pacific variability in these divergences since 1950 by comparing 18 studies that quantify the Pacific contribution to the ‘hiatus’ and earlier periods and by investigating the reasons for differing results. During the ‘global warming hiatus’ from 1992 to 2012, the estimated contributions differ by a factor of five, with multiple linear regression approaches generally indicating a smaller contribution of Pacific variability to global temperature than climate model experiments where the simulated tropical Pacific sea surface temperature (SST) or wind stress anomalies are nudged towards observations. These so-called pacemaker experiments suggest that the ‘hiatus’ is fully explained and possibly over-explained by Pacific variability. Most of the spread across the studies can be attributed to two factors: neglecting the forced signal in tropical Pacific SST, which is often the case in multiple regression studies but not in pacemaker experiments, underestimates the Pacific contribution to global temperature change by a factor of two during the ‘hiatus’; the sensitivity with which the global temperature responds to Pacific variability varies by a factor of two between models on a decadal time scale, questioning the robustness of single model pacemaker experiments. Once we have accounted for these factors, the CMIP5 mean warming adjusted for Pacific variability reproduces the observed annual global mean temperature closely, with a correlation coefficient of 0.985 from 1950 to 2018. The CMIP6 ensemble performs less favourably but improves if the models with the highest transient climate response are omitted from the ensemble mean.

Why Is Climate Sensitivity So Unpredictable?

Science ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 318 (5850) ◽  
pp. 629-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard H. Roe ◽  
Marcia B. Baker
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Analytic Form ◽  
Future Climate Change ◽  
Large Temperature ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Simple Analytic Form ◽  
Global Mean

Uncertainties in projections of future climate change have not lessened substantially in past decades. Both models and observations yield broad probability distributions for long-term increases in global mean temperature expected from the doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide, with small but finite probabilities of very large increases. We show that the shape of these probability distributions is an inevitable and general consequence of the nature of the climate system, and we derive a simple analytic form for the shape that fits recent published distributions very well. We show that the breadth of the distribution and, in particular, the probability of large temperature increases are relatively insensitive to decreases in uncertainties associated with the underlying climate processes.

scholarly journals Exploring the sensitivity of Northern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation to different surface temperature forcing using a statistical–dynamical atmospheric model

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja Totz ◽  
Stefan Petri ◽  
Jascha Lehmann ◽  
Erik Peukert ◽  
Dim Coumou
Keyword(s):  
Temperature Gradient ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Planetary Waves ◽  
Hadley Cell ◽  
Storm Tracks ◽  
Meridional Temperature Gradient ◽  
Jet Streams ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract. Climate and weather conditions in the mid-latitudes are strongly driven by the large-scale atmosphere circulation. Observational data indicate that important components of the large-scale circulation have changed in recent decades, including the strength and the width of the Hadley cell, jets, storm tracks and planetary waves. Here, we use a new statistical–dynamical atmosphere model (SDAM) to test the individual sensitivities of the large-scale atmospheric circulation to changes in the zonal temperature gradient, meridional temperature gradient and global-mean temperature. We analyze the Northern Hemisphere Hadley circulation, jet streams, storm tracks and planetary waves by systematically altering the zonal temperature asymmetry, the meridional temperature gradient and the global-mean temperature. Our results show that the strength of the Hadley cell, storm tracks and jet streams depend, in terms of relative changes, almost linearly on both the global-mean temperature and the meridional temperature gradient, whereas the zonal temperature asymmetry has little or no influence. The magnitude of planetary waves is affected by all three temperature components, as expected from theoretical dynamical considerations. The width of the Hadley cell behaves nonlinearly with respect to all three temperature components in the SDAM. Moreover, some of these observed large-scale atmospheric changes are expected from dynamical equations and are therefore an important part of model validation.

scholarly journals An Assessment of Global Macroeconomic Impacts Caused by Sea Level Rise Using the Framework of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and Representative Concentration Pathways

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 3737
Author(s):  
Osamu Nishiura ◽  
Makoto Tamura ◽  
Shinichiro Fujimori ◽  
Kiyoshi Takahashi ◽  
Junya Takakura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Temperature Increase ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Economic Losses ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Global Mean

Coastal areas provide important services and functions for social and economic activities. Damage due to sea level rise (SLR) is one of the serious problems anticipated and caused by climate change. In this study, we assess the global economic impact of inundation due to SLR by using a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model that incorporates detailed coastal damage information. The scenario analysis considers multiple general circulation models, socioeconomic assumptions, and stringency of climate change mitigation measures. We found that the global household consumption loss proportion will be 0.045%, with a range of 0.027−0.066%, in 2100. Socioeconomic assumptions cause a difference in the loss proportion of up to 0.035% without greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mitigation, the so-called baseline scenarios. The range of the loss proportion among GHG emission scenarios is smaller than the differences among the socioeconomic assumptions. We also observed large regional variations and, in particular, the consumption losses in low-income countries are, relatively speaking, larger than those in high-income countries. These results indicate that, even if we succeed in stabilizing the global mean temperature increase below 2 °C, economic losses caused by SLR will inevitably happen to some extent, which may imply that keeping the global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C would be worthwhile to consider.

scholarly journals Changes in regional climate extremes as a function of global mean temperature: an interactive plotting framework

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Wartenburger ◽  
Martin Hirschi ◽  
Markus G. Donat ◽  
Peter Greve ◽  
Andy J. Pitman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Cycle ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Climate Extremes ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Projected Changes ◽  
Regional Analyses ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract. This article extends a previous study (Seneviratne et al., 2016) to provide regional analyses of changes in climate extremes as a function of projected changes in global mean temperature. We introduce the DROUGHT-HEAT Regional Climate Atlas, an interactive tool to analyse and display a range of well-established climate extremes and water-cycle indices and their changes as a function of global warming. These projections are based on simulations from the 5th phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). A selection of example results are presented here, but users can visualize specific indices of interest using the online tool. This implementation enables a direct assessment of regional climate changes associated with global temperature targets, such as the 2 degree and 1.5 degree limits agreed within the 2015 Paris Agreement.

scholarly journals Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joeri Rogelj ◽  
Alexander Popp ◽  
Katherine V. Calvin ◽  
Gunnar Luderer ◽  
Johannes Emmerling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Temperature Increase ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Global Mean
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document